Comments on: Oregon eyeing open formats
Electronic document standards proposed for state agencies, but not ODF exclusively.
Electronic document standards proposed for state agencies, but not ODF exclusively.
December 26, 2009 2:17 PM PST
December 26, 2009 11:19 AM PST
December 26, 2009 10:04 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
The lawsn't needed from a public policy stadndpoint, and if I had stock in that NY-based company, I'd be concerned as a sharehoilder that my offerings needed liberal government's help/subsidy to survive in the market place.
Sell short, buddies.
This law and the faulty assumptions it's built upon exists as yet another example of junk marketing laundered through the ever-ready political process.
Oregon's requirement specifies Open Source - which means that later generations can actually read the thing... It doesn't specify a brand of word processor.
Have you ever had to get a copy of your birth certificate? If it wasn't copied/notarized directly from a xerox of the original paper document, it likely had to go through half a dozen iterations just to keep it readable to the computer that brought it up for printing. Now it would only have to be kept in one format.
/P
things right for once... :)
- New York
- by cekortech March 29, 2007 11:05 AM PDT
- I wish New York would follow the ODF path.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(9 Comments)Nothing more annoying than working with an
Attorney who has files backed up on 3.5 inch
floppies in MS office Version 2.