Version: 2008

Comments on: Oregon eyeing open formats

Electronic document standards proposed for state agencies, but not ODF exclusively.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
What Is Wrong About This Article???
by Commander_Spock March 28, 2007 10:24 AM PDT
It states inter alia that "the agency or library must be open-source and guided by one of the major standards organizations such as the American National Standards Institute, the Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards, or the International Organization for Standardization, which supports both ODF and Microsoft's proposed Office Open XML formats". See where it says; "the International Organization for Standardization, which supports both ODF and Microsoft's proposed Office Open XML formats". In other words it appears to be saying that the International Organization for Standardization has already "endorsed" a format that has only been proposed for approval before the conclusion of customary reviews. Just how can this be?
Reply to this comment
Marketing laundered through political process
by mwendy March 28, 2007 11:47 AM PDT
Another clever way to use liberal government and the slippertly slope of justifications to rig the market for one very big NY-based IT coporation.

The lawsn't needed from a public policy stadndpoint, and if I had stock in that NY-based company, I'd be concerned as a sharehoilder that my offerings needed liberal government's help/subsidy to survive in the market place.

Sell short, buddies.

This law and the faulty assumptions it's built upon exists as yet another example of junk marketing laundered through the ever-ready political process.
Reply to this comment
Wrong again, my dear Astroturfer...
by Penguinisto March 28, 2007 4:11 PM PDT
ODF is open source, which means that ANYONE can use it... even your buddies in Redmond, Washington (who incidentally already built a free ODF plugin for MS Office)...

Oregon's requirement specifies Open Source - which means that later generations can actually read the thing... It doesn't specify a brand of word processor.

Have you ever had to get a copy of your birth certificate? If it wasn't copied/notarized directly from a xerox of the original paper document, it likely had to go through half a dozen iterations just to keep it readable to the computer that brought it up for printing. Now it would only have to be kept in one format.

/P
View reply
liberal?
by gracie14 April 5, 2007 12:44 PM PDT
This doesn't have anything to do with "liberal government" A lot of liberals do not support this position at all. including me.
Cool - I live in Oregon :)
by Penguinisto March 28, 2007 6:48 PM PDT
It's cool to have a state government on the cutting edge of doing
things right for once... :)
Reply to this comment
how so?
by gracie14 April 5, 2007 12:41 PM PDT
How is this "cutting edge"? Makes no sense at all....
New York
by cekortech March 29, 2007 11:05 AM PDT
I wish New York would follow the ODF path.
Nothing more annoying than working with an
Attorney who has files backed up on 3.5 inch
floppies in MS office Version 2.
Reply to this comment
(9 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement