Comments on: HP balks at patent provision in GPL update
So far, Hewlett-Packard prefers the earlier GPL, raising the specter that two versions of the license will survive.
So far, Hewlett-Packard prefers the earlier GPL, raising the specter that two versions of the license will survive.
January 1, 2010 12:16 PM PST
January 1, 2010 9:20 AM PST
January 1, 2010 7:31 AM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
IMHO, the majority of software patents don't hold water. Note: I said majority, there are some works that are truly patentable.
Having said that, what you're seeing is those companies with the deep pockets to back the "free software", they want to protect their investment. After all, they are there to make money.
Even Stallman the founder of the free software movement believed in selling support.
But I do agree with your comment. There are many misconceptions of the Open/Free Software movement and that when you get companies like IBM, HP, SUN, Oracle, etc getting involved, you will see that they will take control to their advantage.
Also remember that in today's software start-up company's business plan, you want to grow to a certain point, then get bought out by a larger fish. ... But that's another story.
The sad truth... GPL does more to protect IP than other licenses like Apache.
But hey! What do I know? ;-)
- Whatever form, the results are impressive
- by Seaspray0 August 4, 2006 1:37 PM PDT
- The fact that thousands of people would collaberate on a common software project and produce results that can rival that of Corporate programs and receive no compensation.... Amazing! The GPL has proven it's worth.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(5 Comments)