Comments on: Pervasive exits open-source PostgreSQL business

Pervasive Software decides to curtail its initiative to offer commercial support for the open-source database.

[rmiecznik]

So what

MySQL is well and alive, so what that they didn't have a buffer and enought money to stick to it, that was their fault, and not that of the Open Source community.

[Zymurgist]

The problem was

... not an issue with the "open source
community" per se. The problem was that
Pervasive's business model was to provide
support for PostgreSQL -- but they learned that
their customers were finding the various
PostgreSQL forums more responsive and helpful
than what Pervasive provided. Pervasive just
couldn't compete there, so they stopped trying.

There's nothing to do with MySQL (which is quite
a bit different from PostgreSQL -- each
appropriate to their own set of uses).

[rickbbell]

Interesting story

I think it's an interesting story, and it's bigger in scope than PostgreSQL vs MySQL.

It is disappointing that Pervasive failed to turn a profit. MySQL is not the "only show in town" in the realm of open source; there are many different open source products available, not just DBs.

Open source is gaining legitimacy, slowly but surely. But getting "reliable support" is something Fortune 500 companies need to consider when implementing open source. If they have to turn to a support forum, they must assign more risk to their open source choice.

If new businesses emerge offering support to these products, risk goes down, legitimacy goes up, demand for for-sale software goes down, and so do their prices.

And the consumer wins!