Version: 2008

Comments on: Is Microsoft playing well with others?

As it opens up to Linux and rival software, company faces deep skepticism over whether it's really changed its stripes.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
java is opensource?
by idoppler April 7, 2006 4:56 AM PDT
Why is Java, the proprietary technology on Sun called open source in this article? Java is not even open standard, like microsofts C# and CLI which are submitted to ECMA.
A major factual mistake in the article?
Reply to this comment
error fixed
by mlamonica April 7, 2006 5:29 AM PDT
putting "open source" in front of Java was an error and has been fixed.
Corrections...
by Zymurgist April 7, 2006 6:55 AM PDT
Sun's Java is not open source, that is an error.
Saying that Java is not open source is also an
error as there are open-source implementations
(of varying degrees of completeness), including
one being developed by the Apache foundation
that's tentatively endorsed by Sun.

I'd also add that while C#/Db and the CLI have
been submitted to ECMA, many of the core
libraries have not and there are patent issues
related to both. So, while you may be
indemnified against a lawsuits using Microsoft's
implementation, there's nothing to say that
using a different implementation won't cause you
legal troubles later.

Not that you should stop using
non-Microsoft .Net compilers and CLIs (in many
ways, Novell's open-source Mono already performs
better), but one should be cautious.

Personally, I've recently had an opportunity to
fiddle with gcj, and I must say that I'm
somewhat impressed. I don't always want/need a
JVM, and compiling the Java code into native
binaries gives a very tangible difference in
performance. I'd like to see all of Swing ported
rather than being relegated to SWT, but it's a
great first step.
Embrace, extend, extinguish all over again!
by ray08 April 7, 2006 6:02 AM PDT
Right now, M$ is in the embrace stage. This is war and the first rule of war is to "know your enemy". Be on guard!
Reply to this comment
Agreed
by James_U April 7, 2006 6:20 AM PDT
MSFT, like all other publicly traded companies including their competitors, are not in the "feel good", "let's be friends" business. They are in the business of growing market share and revenue for their shareholders. They are not the leaders in the server space, and playing well with competitors is not part of their corporate strategy anymore than IBM wants to "play well" with Oracle, Sun or MSFT. Their goal is embrace and extend competitors in ways that provides value and differentiation for their customers and shareholders ... and yes ultimately defeat the competition. Embrace, extend, extinguish has proven successful for them over the years. It would seem to make sense with open source as well.
View reply
Uh Oh
by April 7, 2006 6:44 AM PDT
Sounds like they're just promoting M$MQ (the worst of the 4-letter words).
Reply to this comment
This is predicatable...
by Zymurgist April 7, 2006 7:03 AM PDT
Linux plays REALLY well in heterogeneous
environments and is much more flexible than MS
products (at the expense of requiring knowledge
to best leverage that flexibility). The result
is that Linux is making a lot of inroads in the
server space -- which is exposing a lot of
shortcomings in Windows and the general
Microsoft tendency to not follow standards, not
focus on interoperation, and not describe how
their products work.

Not that Microsoft products look shoddy, they
simply give the impression that they weren't
designed for contemporary infrastructure so much
as they were for the desktop. And this is
correct.

The only way for MS to make any headway is to
"play well with others". They'll need to do that
until they have sufficient leverage putting them
in a position to screw their customers without
losing them (that's when the big money comes
in).

They'll never be able to embrace-and-extend
Linux out of existence. Even funding SCO's
lawsuits didn't buy them the momentum they need
against Linux. It just can't be killed without
eroding the base of advocates, users, and
developers -- and that's not likely to happen
while general-purpose microprocessors are widely
available and programming is still legal.
Reply to this comment
Here we go again
by Ted Miller April 7, 2006 7:59 AM PDT
Don't you hate it when in commericials and elsewhere you get a big fat blubberly company telling you that "We are your buddies, We are your friends" and they just keep sticking it to you right where it hurts. I will tell you Microsoft you want to be our buddy? Start by lowering the price on all your software and don't give us "Mickey Moused" handicapped versions of anything. None of that software for them and software for us mentality. I do buy a lot of microsoft operating systems from stores like Staples only to find that it will not activate and the I have to talk to a person in India who speaks bad english and could not care less about me????????? I am sorry Microsoft I do like you but..............give me Linux!!! I can only hope many business will join the Linux crowd for I know then that the world will follow.
Reply to this comment
MS Shark Circles The Linux Penquin...
by Llib Setag April 7, 2006 9:09 AM PDT
"Keep your friends close & your enemies closer..." The Godfather.

Citizen Gates & Big Brother Baldy are circling the Penquin while acting as a "friend" to keep the customers from jumping ship & make the "appearance" of being a good neighbor for the US DOJ & EU Judges anti-trust monopoly cases...

" See, we can play nice nice with others, don't fine us millions of dollars..." DOJ is watching & EU is pending million dollar penalties very shortly.

AstalaVista has tanked AGAIN on it's features & delivery date, so snuggle up to Linux Penquin just before the Linux event to keep the MS Drones from switching to Unix / Linux / Mac OSX Unix.

micro-soft needs viagra & Darth Gates will do anything to maintain his Microsith Empire.

Once a MShark, always a MShark.

Seattlites have seen "Jaws" in action, be prepared & be afraid my friends...
Reply to this comment
...Changed its stripes?
by Thad Boyd April 7, 2006 10:19 AM PDT
Dude, if you're going to open your article with a cliche, you should probably get it right.

The phrase you're looking for is "changed its SPOTS". As in, "You can't change a leopard's spots." Leopards don't have stripes.

Leopard, conveniently, is also the name of Apple's next OS.

The current OS is called Tiger.

Tigers have stripes. Leopards don't.
Reply to this comment
anti competition
by davidman2010 April 7, 2006 1:28 PM PDT
All this is is anti competition. So typical.
Reply to this comment
My friend Bill
by JFDMit April 7, 2006 4:18 PM PDT
Yep, this is classic M$ behavior when they encounter a technology they can't buy, steal or replicate.

Whenever I hear that M$ wants to be my friend, I immediately check my wallet and then look over my shoulder for the knife I know must be sticking out of my back.
Reply to this comment
Here it comes..
by Sil3nt71 April 7, 2006 5:36 PM PDT
I think with Apple's iMac dual-booting XP, they thought it'd be a good idea to look like they're being more open too. Don't get me wrong, I'm a Microsoft supporter, but this just looks like history repeating itself. Have people run Microsoft-sanctioned Linux servers, and then slowly get them to make the jump to Windows, by cutting support for the product.

Or they may just be doing it for PR..who's to know now-a-days...but...people are watching, Microsoft.
Reply to this comment
Microsoft has changed.
by t8 December 19, 2006 2:02 PM PST
They have decided overnight to be a nice company.

Yeah Right!
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement