Version: 2008

Comments on: Firefox beta out of the foxhole

Browser's test version offers such features as automatic updates and improvements designed to speed browser navigation.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
The Firefox Club
by IBTSys November 3, 2005 1:57 PM PST
This appears to be Firefox only members club. Only glowing compliments are allowed. All others are removed. Watch - Poof!
Reply to this comment
I'm sure it was a glitch
by System Tyrant November 3, 2005 2:01 PM PST
I do wonder what happend though. Maybe one of the moderators would ever be so kind as to let us know what happend.
2 comments, but none found?
by powerclam November 3, 2005 3:21 PM PST
CNet's new system really seems buggy as heck.
Reply to this comment
100th Million Download
by Techno Guy November 3, 2005 3:48 PM PST
Does anyone else get a bit suspicious of that number? I appreciate Firefox, and use it for much of my browsing. But that's a _lot_ of downloads. Would Firefox zealots go so far as to create download routines that simply repeatedly download the browser in order to inflate that number?
Reply to this comment
100 Million in perspective
by gnuru November 4, 2005 5:22 AM PST
The 100 million number may be accurate without any shenanigans by zealots. Consider: between two home computers (one Windows, one Linux) I have personally downloaded various iterations of Firefox about 40 times since release 0.8, more than a year and a half ago (some of these were repeat downloads due to having done something incredibly stupid). Given that their upgrade methodology requires a fresh download, this may not be atypical for a medium or long-term user. If we settle on, say, 20 downloads per long-term user, then only 5 million of us need exist to attain this milestone. Toss in the five-or-fewer recent downloaders and 100 million now seems to have taken a while to reach. I can't say that intentional inflation wasn't employed by the misguided; it doesn't seem necessary, though. There are just too many unknowns to know for sure.
View reply
100th Million Download
by ssalava November 4, 2005 8:21 AM PST
That wouldn't surprise me -- I recall a quote from an IBM executive (John Patrick?) in the mid-90s touting the market share of OS/2 when most of the "users" were not human, but merely the OS/2 kernel running ATMs.
Still a long way to go for firefox
by tzhang2 November 4, 2005 6:38 PM PST
Firefox is still not quite stable on windows. It frequently takes more than 95% CPU time on my machine. So I have to restart it.

Tom
http://www.yuanxintech.com
Reply to this comment
Conspiracy...
by System Tyrant November 5, 2005 4:09 PM PST
Ok, not really. I don't really buy into the whole conspiracy theory thing, but I have noticed that firefox seams to hang more often these days on websites. I also noticed that it seams to have started happening after some of the post SP2 updates on Windows XP Pro. Of course it's probably either Microsoft has changed some underpinning again or firefox is getting more complex and will require some speed enhancements.
Worldwide FF Use Is 11.5%
by Stating November 4, 2005 11:30 PM PST
Maybe percentage use of Firefox is more important than how many downloads have been done. When you consider all the strikes against Firefox, i.e. sites that only function with IE, I think it is doing quite well.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/440
"Firefox fanbase reaches new high
More than 10% of net users are going online with the Firefox browser, show figures from analysis firm One Stat. The global average of 11.5% is the highest percentage of users that the open source browser has ever reached. The research also reveals that Americans are the biggest fans of Firefox with 14.1% using it. In the UK 4.9% use it to get around online."
Reply to this comment
Consume 95% of CPU? Get real. it consumes < 2% on average
by atish505 November 7, 2005 12:01 AM PST
U may be havig a spyware disguised as firefox (there are lot of these out there). Check out using an anti spyware tool.
Reply to this comment
Memory...
by Rusdude November 7, 2005 10:19 AM PST
I don't think FF should ever consume 95%, but I do find it to be a memory hog when multiple tabs are open. I do have more than a few extensions, so I'm pretty sure that's the issue -- extensions need to tightened up.
95%???
by rageboy04 November 26, 2005 12:19 PM PST
I wouldn't go as far as to say 95%. Under 2% if idle. Mine uses around 30 percent of my CPU when loading sites. Usually it uses around 34 megs of memory. You might be having problems.

This refers to Firefox 1.5 RC 3

Also, just putting this out, I use Firefox, but supposedly Opera is a really good browser, too. Just don't use Netscape or IE. Netscape is quite slow and IE is very insecure.
Firefox official release
by mike_c November 16, 2005 1:38 AM PST
If you need your browser to be stable, wait for the official release and skip this beta.

If your not using Firefox already once you switch you will never go back to IE.

Free Pixel Advertising - Add your site here for free
http://www.freepixeladvertising.com

Pixel Advertsing Forum - Discuss here about Pixel Ads, Pixel Sites, Pixel Scripts, etc
http://www.pixeladstalk.com
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

Latest tech news headlines

RSS Feeds

Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.

More feeds available in our RSS feed index.

advertisement