Comments on: Sun mulls buying Novell
Acquisition of Linux seller would hurt rival IBM, Sun says. But it wouldn't exactly be a bargain.
Acquisition of Linux seller would hurt rival IBM, Sun says. But it wouldn't exactly be a bargain.
January 3, 2010 9:30 PM PST
January 3, 2010 4:40 PM PST
January 3, 2010 3:10 PM PST
Add headlines from CNET News to your homepage or feedreader.
More feeds available in our RSS feed index.
Related quotes
Here's why:
1) There are too many Novell-centric shops out there that can guarantee Novell business for decades to come.
2) Novell's management is very stubborn - unlike other companies, it's board and management are very much commited to making the company succeed. They don't sell out that easily.
3) Novell is in the middle of re-inventing itself, and spreading roots out into the Linux world - a transition that will take years to accomplish.
4) Novell is not in any dire straits. With over a billion dollars in cash reserves, and income in the green, Novell is actually profitable for a change.
5) Lastly, Sun's commitment to open source Linux is still cryptic at best. Will there, or won't there be any support for Linux? At $2Billion, that's an expensive bet for a company with such a limited amount of commitment to Open-Source Linux.
6) There are smaller, easier, and cheaper fishes for Sun to aquire outside of Novell - plus, they don't come with any NDS - centric baggage Sun will have to support.
Red Hat dominates the Linux server OS today, while SuSE is a very distant 2nd. But if we think outside the box, there's a Linux-like alernative: Solaris x86.
Solaris x86 offers far more potential. Despite Sun's attempts to choke off Solaris x86 years ago, there are still alot of users running Solaris x86. Sun is far better off rejuvenating this installed base (e.g. upgrading to Opteron)and building ISV support around Solaris x86. Why would ISVs support Solaris?....
Well, the ISVs know that x86 with 64-bit extension platform will be a big growth market for the next several years. More importantly, if customer run an app on x86+64, they would over time migrate that app to true 64-bit. So if I'm an ISV, I need to get my foot in the x86+64 platform or stand to lose migratory customers in the future! So, ISVs gonna have to recompile their 64-bit CRM/ERP/SCM/database apps for 32-bit w/64-bit extensions platforms anyway. By defintion, there aren't many apps on 64-bit Windows (the OS doesn't even exist yet!), which leaves apps currently ported to Linux and UNIX ripe for re-compiling....Only one UNIX flavor runs on x86. Solaris. Sun has no competition here. All they have to do here is:
1. Build ISV support for Solaris x86
2. Qualify Solaris x86 on x86 and Opteron hardware. Developing their own Opteron boxes was a good move.
3. "Open source" Solaris.
3. Price Solaris x86 at or below what Red Hat charges for annual subcription.
Small hint: they just acquired Salmon. Well... maybe not that small... It's a whole new world out there.
Keep in mind the home state of Novell. If the forces of nature and all the other stuff that happened to them in the past couldn't break Novell then what will? Don't say others haven't tried their utmost best. You see, it's really about attitude that makes the difference. A difference that matters. A difference that makes the difference.
- Sun and Options
- by David Arbogast August 3, 2004 8:58 AM PDT
- In response to the first post: The acquisition of Novell makes sense because Novell has an agreement with IBM. Suse linux was not the default IBM standard until Novell had it. Remember, Linux is given away free. It is not an asset. The contract with IBM is the asset.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(4 Comments)