Comments on: Mozilla gives add-on developers a tip jar
Creators of add-ons for Firefox now have a way to get paid for their work--at least through Mozilla's add-ons site.
Creators of add-ons for Firefox now have a way to get paid for their work--at least through Mozilla's add-ons site.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
As the son of a Palm programmer, Josh Lowensohn grew up in a household full of technology. From a young age he was taking apart computers, finding hot new bulletin board systems, and re-programming video games. Josh currently covers the latest and greatest Web apps and services for CNET's Webware blog. Prior to that he covered news, and wrote reviews for GamersReports.com. For this blog Josh is exploring the latest Web apps and technologies, and trends in consumer entertainment devices.
Add this feed to your online news reader
That being said I realize that if the developers don't get anything for their work at some point they will stop developing the add-on and given enough new versions of Firefox it will break. Honestly, for all of the talk I remember far more add-ons 4-5 years ago than I do now, but a lot of developers stopped development because it took away too much time from their real jobs or their personal lives or maybe a combination of the two. Hobbies that don't pay inevitably get put on the backburner at some point. You might get back to it and you might not.
There are a handful of add-ons I feel useful that I might give a $1 or $2 although I am interested in what the fees are for these "special" Paypal accounts since a normal paypal account can face some stiff fees for small transactions.
I do not like the "Suggested Donation", you might as well be putting a price on the product and would probably shy away from 'tipping' someone who put a suggested amount on their product.
Most people will probably do very small amounts because the lifetime of these 'products' is extremely limited and your 'purchase' provides no guarantee of updates or support.
http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/2585/beware-google-reader-notifier-for-firefox-is-now-crapware/
That's a silly question. It's like asking "how much would you be willing to pay for a software program?". Maybe 2 cents, maybe $1000, maybe nothing. It depends on how useful it is. You could ask "how much would you be willing to pay for the most useful addon that you use?"
Then you have the problem of setting up an acct to pay or make donations...If it was easier people would donate easier to the more established add-ons...
the other addons... not really...
- by aaasolanki July 18, 2009 12:56 AM PDT
- ---Nice idea. Developers could also offer paid & free versions for their add-ons, the former offering a lot more customization and features than the latter. That's exactly what one of my favorite extensions named Fireshot does.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(21 Comments)---Yes, there is certainly a conflict between the Open Source/GNU Licensing nature of Firefox, its add-ons and the thought of people making money out of it. That's left to the 'fine print' makers. [:)] But yes, I certainly agree that developers need to be rewarded/paid for the time and effort that they spend developing and maintaining their add-ons.
Thanks,
Abhishek.