Comments on: Why can't Windows shut down promptly?
Windows XP, Vista, and even the beta of Windows 7 can take forever to shut down or terminate non-responsive applications. That can't be right.
Windows XP, Vista, and even the beta of Windows 7 can take forever to shut down or terminate non-responsive applications. That can't be right.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
As founder of SafeKids.com and co-director of ConnectSafely.org, Larry Magid has a special interest in Internet safety, including debunking myths like a predator behind every screen and messages like "be afraid, very afraid."
Add this feed to your online news reader
A good thing, too--if MS were more forceful, imagine a database machine that hadn't yet had the chance to commit data to the disc.
To find the third party app, install an app and then shut down. When you find the one that changes the shutdown from instant to 5 minutes, you will know who to call and complain to.
Your analogies are flawed. Everything you listed doesn't allow third party modifications. Your supposition that MS doesn't know how to do it is flawed--look at the XBOX. It shuts off instantly. How about In Sync in cars? Instant.
Rather than blaming MS for your stupid programs, maybe you should use different programs.
user A: hey why is my PC so garbage?
user B: because you didnt configure it properly answers almost all asked and answered questions.
may be we can learn more from users like these who use common sense. you did it right mike.
Mike
you are absolutely right. As a temporary fix I have installed a program that will turn off my XP-based notebook very quickly. The thing I hate is the 20 questions I have to answer regarding files that may be open, or apps that seem to want permission to shut down.
What Microsoft could do is this, they could have a fast shutdown button that says, I'm shutting down and kiss any unsaved data goodbye.
What they could also do is create a "last shutdown" folder, where all open files are dumped, that you could go back to an process (at a time of your choosing) when you restart.
That's probably too smart an idea for Microsoft, so I have little hope of seeing anything as useful as this in my lifetime.
The bottom line is this, I refuse to be held hostage to a computer that takes five minutes to start up or shut down. Microsoft better get wise to this, or I (and many others) will most assuredly vote (elsewhere) with our dollars.
when i see people complain about why windows isn't working the way they believe it should, the problem can almost always be traced back to them. the other possibility is bad hardware, but you need to understand that it's up to the hardware maker to build a device well and then also write drivers that aren't buggy. MS can't really do much about that when the hardware is sub-par. but you have to admit it's awfully nice of MS to make an OS that gives you the choice to install it on an extremely wide variety of hardware, unlike Apple. so let's get back to user error. i don't know what you people are doing to mess up your computers, but i have 8 computers running Windows (XP, Server 2003, Vista) in my house right now and they all work wonderfully. they shutdown within seconds of receiving a shutdown command and they boot up quick also. i don't do any special tuning other than turn off my page file. we're quickly getting to the point where a page file isn't even needed anymore because we're getting so much RAM now and 64 bit architecture is allowing it all to be utilized. anyway, clearing the page file sometimes can slow down a shutdown quite a bit. maybe that's your problem. so then my suggestion to you is, be more mindful of what's running on your computer and realize that it's going to take some time with your slow computer to kill the million programs you have open and kill the mile long list of programs you have in your taskbar. complain about Windows all you want, but give someone a Mac that doesn't want to take the time to learn how it's OS works, and they will find a way to mess it up and then complain that it doesn't work. mark my words. i've done plenty of things to mess up OS X but the difference is that i didn't act like i knew what i was doing and then complained about it.
3-D screen savers can cause problems with Standby and Hibernate. MS knows this and there is a patch.
Also, for all you that are having trouble shutting down, have you tried a little app by Steve Gibson called "Wizmo? ( http://www.grc.com/wizmo/wizmo.htm )
You can amend the command line to force Windows to shut down with an exclamation mark (!); although caution is advised using this as you will see if you go to the site.
- by 0zcan April 20, 2009 3:50 PM PDT
- I installed Windows 7 the other week and it was working perfectly on its own until I installed new software which were designed for WIndows XP.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 8 of 8 pages (275 Comments)The new software unfortunately is causing problems and something is ausing the system to hang. It will not shutdown so I go for the reset button. Anyway, the point is Windows works fantastic and only falls over when the user :) decides to install outdated or non-compliant software.
People who think every software under the sun written by developers for windows is going to work and function without a problem have to get their thinking correct and have to stop hitting MS under-the-belly.
As for MAC and LINUX, well they are harder for me to control and do not allow me to control my computer system. They have more restrictions than Windows and cause even more strife for people like me. Perhaps others feel the opposite but none-the-less all these OS are a necessary evil where society now can't live without it. We need them for the good and for the bad times.
Farewell!