Comments on: Obama orders manned space program review
NASA's fiscal 2010 $18.7 billion budget request includes near-term funding boost for post-shuttle moon program, but $3.1 billion in cuts through 2013.
NASA's fiscal 2010 $18.7 billion budget request includes near-term funding boost for post-shuttle moon program, but $3.1 billion in cuts through 2013.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Timely coverage of breaking space news, from shuttle operations and assembly of the International Space Station to planetary exploration, space science, and development of the next generation of manned spacecraft. You can follow Bill Harwood's frequent status updates at the CBSNews.com Space Place.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Well, they made us become familiar with names like "Tora Bora"..... (Took First Blood); so, what is with wrong with returning fire-for-fire!
"Lest We Forget 9/11"!
And keep your hands in your own toilet stall, pervert.
That's taking good care of people's money.
Obama is very pro-understanding the universe, and he's increasing the science budget to a historical percentage of the GDP, which is awesome. I think NASA's budget does deserve curtailing though. We don't need to go to Mars right now, we need to solve the shortage of water and energy on earth, feed the hungry, cure diseases, and end the gaping inequality between men and women, and whites and minorities. Mars can come after that.
@BtmnHatesRbn:
Obama's birth certificate - http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/51/BarackObamaCertificationOfLiveBirthHawaii.jpg/614px-BarackObamaCertificationOfLiveBirthHawaii.jpg happy now? please stop being an idiotic believer in everything you hear - you are a shame to your country
NASA could land a man on Neptune using only a rubber band and a Ziploc baggie before we solve any of those problems with every bit of currency on Earth.
Besides, of all the areas you might think of where extraneous money is to be usurped, you pick the one agency with the potential to find solutions to all of those problems? Really? You think NASA is the most unworthy recipient of wasteful government spending? Have you seen the federal budget?
Ironically, the solutions to our planet's energy challenges, resource shortages and life-threatening diseases may lie in the further exploration of space. Manned spaceflight has already given us satellite technology and inspired the personal computer. What future technologies await discovery? What life-improving innovations may help us feed the hungry or meet our energy challenges?
We'll never repair the deficiencies of the human condition by restraining the human spirit.
Second point: Never use wikimedia for a sound reference. It makes you look like someone that claims the president is not a legal American citizen. Even if the reference is correct. Don't do it. Use sound references.
Third point: Our president talks a great game about our future. Our true future is out there. Not on this planet. It is out there. We must push forward.
Fourth point: NASA needs to make sure that they are using our tax dollars without too much waste. Anytime you spend that much money there will be some waste. LM and Boeing and the others need to make sure they do not abuse the cost plus system.
Last point: The science that puts us in space puts us farther ahead than our friends and enemies in science and math. Is this not part of our president's goals?
I think what would really help our science output is collaboration with other nations. Sure it's nice that "no one can wrest leadership in space from the United States," but the scientific method at it's core is cooperative, and we can only benefit by making our space projects INTERnational.
Globalize us into space, great idea.
Prolong the human race beyond the lifetime of our sun? At this rate, we'll be lucky to prolong the human race beyond the lifetime of a sunspot.
Hate is human nature. So is the desire to learn. It is up to us to chose which we should follow. Your suggestion is that in a thousand generations our race, the human race, cannot over come political and social issues of today. That seems a bit trivial when faced with a larger problem of the fact that the earth cannot support a never ending growth of humans.
We must learn to make new worlds. If we do not then we shall die.
NASA is also the solution to the global warming crisis. For instance, we can carry up enough big balloons to choke off hurricane development with shade over the Gulf of Mexico during hurricane season. Deny NASA now and we will deny our children the chance to save themselves. We must carry on. Our duty demands it. We must not falter. It is up to us. We must win the freedom of the generations, now and forever more.
- by vulture2 May 10, 2009 2:49 PM PDT
- NASA can provide practical benefits, but only if they are its primary objectives. If we want to develop the technology for practical human spaceflight, Constellation will not provide it. If we want t develop improved weather prediction, medical advances, safer and more efficient air travel, Constellation will not provide them.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(19 Comments)As to international cooperation, I've sat at a launch console with a Russian, and worked in a research lab with a citizen of China. Thanks to the space program, I've had the chance to work with people from all over the world. When you get to know people as individuals, you realize we are all the same, and that we can trust each other and work together to accomplish things that would be impossible for one person, or one nation. That is the most valuable thing the ISS program has accomplished.