Comments on: Apple rolls out Safari 3.1 browser
The latest iteration of the browser, available for both Mac and Windows operating systems, was made available on Tuesday.
The latest iteration of the browser, available for both Mac and Windows operating systems, was made available on Tuesday.
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.
The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.
I hope this motivates MS to get it's browser development in gear.
I've heard the forthcoming IE 8 passes the Acid2 test. I hope it
really does have better support of web standards and is also
speedier.
In the meantime, Windows users should check out Safari 3.1.
http://www.webstandards.org/action/acid2/
http://www.apple.com/safari/
Windows version is as carefully vetted and optimized as the OS X
version. I think it'd be hasty to assume that it would be quite as
slick under Windows (lots of feature are missing too, you can't
just drag a chunk of a web-page off and have it become a
sidebar widget like you can with the OS X dashboard, for
example -- and there are honestly useful toolbars for FF and IE
under Windows).
That said, I do understand that there's talk at MS about using
Safari as sort of the standard for browser comparison in
developing IE8. Not because of the merits of the browser itself,
but rather because in researching mobile-based web-traffic
they've found Safari on iPhone accounts for almost 80% of
mobile web-browsing. If MS wants to take a big slice of that pie,
they're going to have to work for it.
Safari works quite well, don't get me wrong, but FF3 looks to be more efficient than anything else alive (and Internet Explorer majorly sucks the big one in memory usage)
proof here: http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080317-firefox-3-goes-on-a-diet-eats-less-memory-than-ie-and-opera.html
/P
http://bdn.backbase.com/blog/sjoerd/performance-is-everything
They show the opposite conclusion: that Safari/Webkit is the fastest web browser engine with Firefox 3 in second place. In running my own code, that's been my conclusion as well. Firefox 3 is actually quite good. But the latest Safari is turning in the best performance numbers right now.
application. Some people will say that this is a good thing and
that because of this Firefox is the same application on Windows
as it is on the Mac and Linux. Unfortunately, this also means
that Firefox does not behave like normal Mac applications and
does not take advantage of the services available. For example,
in order to browse using a network proxy server you need to
manually configure the server within Firefox whereas native
applications will get their network settings from System
Preferences automatically, and change when you select a new
Location. If it wasn't for things like this then I'd happily
recommend Firefox but instead I'd recommend Camino instead -
it uses the same rendering engine as Firefox but wraps it in a
native Mac application that behaves as you'd expect.
At this time I'm trying out Safari 3.1 but Camino 1.6 is pretty
darned good too.
When you download and install Quicktime you have the option to have it check for updates. This should be a no-brainer, especially given the
frequent updates for Quicktime.
However, once you do this Apple doesn't just post updates to Quicktime. Listed in the "updates" are Quicktime+iTunes and what did I see today on Apple 'Updater' for my PC? "Safari 3.1"
Maybe they should change the name to the "Apple Marketer". Joe Average User just clicks on all of the "Update Now" button to stay secure and now he has iTunes and Safari on his computer.
/P
- by rlockrey June 13, 2008 7:45 PM PDT
- I have to say I am very impressed with this release of Safari 3.11 for Windows. Its been so stable Im planning switching all the clients across the network to force browsing with only Safari. I have to agree with edge here, MS needs to get there game on now, this is a very slick browser for Windows. I think it could take the top browser easy.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(14 Comments)