Comments on: The future of Web apps will see the death of e-mail
At the conference in Miami, more than a few Web 2.0 power players have been talking quite a bit about how e-mail really sucks.
At the conference in Miami, more than a few Web 2.0 power players have been talking quite a bit about how e-mail really sucks.
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.
The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.
spams end up in the trash, and it's easy to find them!
it's not email's fault that there are bad ISPs and bad clients out
there.
Of course Google bought Postini which is a rock solid product.
I dont think I got much of any back when I used hotmail last year
either.
This article and whoever thinks that myspace and facebook messaging is going to replace email are all retarded.
Apps may be good for quick short messages to arrange meetings or phone calls, and for casual conversation, but they aren't going to be a replacement for true email accounts.
DO you see the logic here? Oh so i gotta create an account at (w/e) and message you. Sounds like email, but email is better. At least with email, i only need your email address, not your username + site your at, then gotta create an account, then add as friend, then after approval we can EMAIL each other using their own private system.
second only to oxygen.
And what's this about spam being a problem? Spam was
eliminated in 2006.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2004/01/24/tech/main595595.
shtml
image uploaders). JavaScript: designed to be insecure. Flash
vulnerabilities. Quicktime vulnerabilities (how many updates this
year?). RealPlayer vulnerabilities.
Sounds like a perfect recipe for replacing email.
(I didn't mention Silverlight: a great test of whether Microsoft is
serious about security: new product built in the new era of
security assurance process. Too soon to tell whether it moves
up the to the first paragraph, or not.)
instead of POST. Not implementing public and private keys, and
so on.
Most email clients only use a normal transfer protocol.(Except
when logging in.) Meaning their security is only as good as
public and private keys. Thus, Javascript isn't weaker than them.
Plugins weren't ever meant to be secure. As you said, their not.
ActiveX can be turned off, and only IE 6 and below uses it for
XMLHttpRequest. And is IE specific. So why would use it.
http://www-306.ibm.com/software/lotus/category/uc2/
Communicator and Live Communications server. We through Notes
6.0 mail as well....BUH BYE!!!! Notes 6.0 was/is the worst email
client ever created.
I dont know anyone at work that misses it.
These comments sound like the "younger generation" in the last decade that responded to challenges to their their dot-com excel business plans with "you just don't get it". Yeah, the web was new, but not every site was destined to be profitable. And the "web 2.0" isn't the answer to everything.
sorry for the extensive use of " ", it's just that way too many people talk in cliches.
I love your scorn from those of us classified as the "younger generation". Yeah, I use email, for official things but how many things are OFFICIAL? How profitable will a site be if people only use it for official communication? Not very.
Personally, I find email, well, lonely. It's not quick or convenient to utilize "outlook" or yahoo mail. No one checks their email on a regular basis [not even my professors]. Only way it can survive is through cellphones and data plans are outrageous. Adding $20-40 extra dollars to my monthly bill is not likely for me. I pay for college, gas, housing, etc -- leaving no room for extras like that.
Im/texting is more viable since its cheaper [http://around 10-15 extra per month for unlimited msgs.|http://around 10-15 extra per month for unlimited msgs.] and fills email's niche quite nicely.
And for online communication, social networks and im work better than email for convenient comm. with quicker, more engaged feedback. And, yes, you CAN type as much in im as an email.
Times change, so does communication.
Could you clarify it for me?
Call me old fashioned, but I think the ubiquitousness of email will endure at least a little longer.
Chatting, et. al., has its place; so does email.
And as others have noted, with a little effort and forethought, you can virtually eliminate spam.
The more things change, the more they stay the same. Great article -- 100% hype, 0% vision.
- really?
- by Stufiano March 3, 2008 5:33 PM PST
- Seeing as major employers are ALREADY ON facebook and using for communication, I fail to see you point.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(25 Comments)Could you clarify it for me?