Comments on: Mozilla testing near-final Firefox 3.5
Release Candidate 1 for Firefox 3.5 still could be weeks away, though a widespread testing day to debug the updated browser was held Friday anyway.
Release Candidate 1 for Firefox 3.5 still could be weeks away, though a widespread testing day to debug the updated browser was held Friday anyway.
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
I used Firefox 3.5 beta earlier today, runs fast, renders pages quickly with no trouble and runs every addon I use on a day to day basis.
The problem with addons is when you go overboard and, if you're complaining there are too many, I'm betting you went overboard with them.
By the way, both Chrome and IE are trying to get more addons, Firefox just happens to have the hard part already in place.
That's nowhere near true.
I've been updating Firefox from v3.0.0 and none of my extensions stopped working. (and i have lots of them)
Plus, it's the author of the extension that specifies whether his extension should stop working with a new minor release, although a minor release doesn't affect extensions, so it's the authors mistake not Firefox's.
it was supposed to be released it December
and BTW, 1812, do you think it's acceptable that a minor dot update to fix bugs or security holes breaks just about every theme or extension you have installed? I don't know of any other software that behaves this poorly, so why is that defensible?
It is the author of the extension/theme who has to check its compatibility. If the extension is not being regularly updated, it is the author's fault, not Mozilla's.
Wow, what a superfluous statement. Every single addon breaks? Not really, there are a few handful that break but I'm a risk taker and I have disabled addon compatibility checking. If any problem, occurs, I'll open up in safe mode and then permanently disable the culprit addon.
Remember that each extension has its own author that is usually not affiliated with Mozilla at all other than the fact that they upload their addon to a Mozilla site. It is not Mozilla's job to pester developers to update and test their code.
More tacky bloat, you mean.
The plugin developer is the one who sets the compatability. Some developers set it open so no check is done. Some set a "maximum" version for compatability. But you can override this check.
1. In your address bar, type "about:config" (remember, no quotes).
2. Once the configuration page loads, right click anywhere within the configuration options list and select "New" and then select "Boolean" from the choices given.
3. The next box that pops will ask you to "Enter the preference name". Enter: "extensions.checkCompatibility" (without quotes). Then click OK.
4. Another box will pop up asking you to choose the Boolean value. Select "False" and click OK. Your new statement should now appear in the list of configuration options.
5. Restart your browser and all your incompatible add-ons should mostly work.
Keemal
Try https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/browse/type:2 for many many skins/themes to change the look of firefox. They are as easy to install/use as a plugin. They have compact, aero, holiday themed, etc.
E
IE is the least compatible browser out there. For my websites, I usually have to add extra code just to get the site working in IE.
Also, Firefox (version 3.0.10) is already the safest. I once wrote a test webpage just for fun in about 5 minutes that prevented the page from being closed. Every time I tried to close it in IE, Safari, and Chrome, it would just open a new window with the same webpage. But that script didn't work in Firefox. Go Firefox!
http://reviews.cnet.com/browsers/firefox-3/4864-3514_7-33087853.html?messageID=10022241&tag=commProfileMain;profileBot
I use the IE Tab add-on which automatically uses the embedded IE rendering engine for MHTML pages
I prefer unobtrusive features over a very slight speed difference any day.
HUGE memory usage is my primary concern with the new 3.5, can someone who has used it address this? Is this corrected. I like FF3 otherwise.
- by rshimizu12 June 7, 2009 11:40 PM PDT
- Firefox works great. I can view 99.99999% of all web pages without problems.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(37 Comments)