Comments on: 5 Twitter improvements we're still waiting for
Twitter is a great service, but that doesn't mean it's not lacking in some areas. We take a look at all those places Twitter leaves much to be desired.
Twitter is a great service, but that doesn't mean it's not lacking in some areas. We take a look at all those places Twitter leaves much to be desired.
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
Photos: Unboxing Nexus One
faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.
Also, as long as twitter allows clients to do some of the things you want, they may just focus on growing the infrastructure. Tweetdeck, for example, lets you make groups and do filtering.
plus you can send more then 140 but it cuts off and only lets web users see
I think it would be an absolute disservice to disregard the sms aspect of Twitter. As one of the folks before me said, Twitter is unique for the sms system...
I think you're overlooking the beauty of the 140 character limit, though. Squeezing in what you want to say within the limit is part of the fun of Twitter. It encourages terseness and making sure you get the point across as quickly as possible. As fugawe notes, upping the limit from the (arbitrary) 140 limit to a 200 character limit would only result in an inevitable escalation of the limit. We already have good forums for spreading longer messages (blogs, websites, newspaper articles, magazines, etc). A focus on short and to the point messages is a novelty, and it's what really makes Twitter shine as a service, rather than being just another blogging platform, imho.
Great post!
Same goes for Facebook. There's no need to change something that works just so more drama can be created.
Mobility is also a core principle of Twitter and if tweets can no longer be delivered via SMS, mobile users will be left out. Dan argues that third party applications could allow people to bypass the SMS limit by using the Web. Though true, SMS is supported by the vast majority of handsets on the market today and reaches the largest number of potential users. The only cost to those users are the charges by their carrier for sending or receiving text messages. Third party apps for traditional handsets could have an upfront cost at the time of purchase, and they would all have long-term charges for the data plan to support that application.
The 140 character limit is part of the essence of Twitter; it defines the style, cost and use of the service. Increasing that limit is not the right path for Twitter.
As for the rest of your suggestions, there are third party apps to handle all of them. I think, even more than the ability to SMS tweets, what defines Twitter is the limitless extensibility. Add this functionality to the main site, and it quickly becomes a very complicated service, because others would have different lists of five updates they wanted. It's better to provide an incredibly simple interface, and allow people to pick tools which allow them to better utilize the service.
I wrote a blog post yesterday on just this matter, if anyone's interested:
http://wyattpeak.com/2009/01/19/why-simplicity-is-king/
Qwitter - sends you an email when someone stops following you. (see @tacobell00)
Tweetburner - like TinyURL, but along with shortening links, it tracks the clicks on them.
I would add to your list - display on someone's page whether or not *they follow you*.
http://onceateacher.wordpress.com
?@nosugrefneb
To be fair to you, Twitter could be much easier for people to "get" (I think Twitter acknowledges that to). Currently, you need to know where to go away from the main site to find the websites and applications that make Twitter much more valuable. For that reason, my only request would be that the service be given an "app store" that makes the stuff that adds so much value much easier to find and use.
Ian Hendry
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
http://www.wecando.biz
- by linkerjpatrick January 20, 2009 6:30 AM PST
- I also disagree with changing the limit on the # of characters. If I want to post something that needs more characters I will write a blog post. Often I will have people ask those thought provoking questions that just want fit in the a Tweet well that is great stimulus for a blog post and now some blogs are having the ablity to plug in (pun intended) to Twitter as another means of commenting and I love that.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (37 Comments)I do however definitely agree that grouping and or tagging of people is needed. I like you you can do this in Tweetdeck but you still have to know about the person to group them. My favorite means of grouping are by location (I love following local people I already know or would love to meeting at an in-person networking meeting. Another means of grouping would be for interest areas. I would love it if I could add tags for things I enjoy like photography, movies, web development, geocaching, etc.
As curious of a person as I am I tried out a service that notified me when someone stopped following me and it made me feel sour for the rest of the day wondering what the heck I did to make them stop? This was someone I knew and was honored they were following me as well.