Version: 2008

Comments on: Wikimedia Foundation raises $6.2 million for Wikipedia

Foundation reaches goal of raising more than $6 million to sustain Wikipedia. The money will be used to maintain and grow the foundation's technical infrastructure.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by someguy999 January 2, 2009 12:03 PM PST
good things happening to a good site!
Reply to this comment
by Mr. Dee January 2, 2009 12:11 PM PST
I love Wikipedia, I think its one of the best websites in the whole wide world. :)
Reply to this comment
by jaxstephens January 2, 2009 12:46 PM PST
I absolutely love Wikipedia, and I was one of the people who donated with their recent push. I use the sucker so much that I figured I owed them something after all these years. Heck, today alone I've consulted Wikipedia probably a dozen items.
Reply to this comment
by thekohser January 2, 2009 7:02 PM PST
Interesting that you'd use the word "sucker" in your joyous response.
by nicmart January 2, 2009 1:56 PM PST
Misinformation wants to be free!
Reply to this comment
by YankeePoodle January 2, 2009 2:05 PM PST
Wales did a good job justifying the 6 million campaign by dissecting some details of the how it will be used in his appeal for donations and is the reason why Wikipedia was able to reach its goals.
Reply to this comment
by mattflaschen January 2, 2009 6:05 PM PST
This is a significant accomplishment, but note that not all of this money is for Wikipedia. There are other projects, including Wiktionary, Wikimedia Commons, and Wikibooks.
Reply to this comment
by thekohser January 2, 2009 7:01 PM PST
Interesting use of the fictional appellation "founder" for Jimbo. I guess Dr. Larry Sanger was just a figment of all of our imaginations. I'll pipe down and get back to chewing on this blue pill. CNET: once again the center of hard-hitting journalism. Just like this laugher: http://news.cnet.com/1606-2-6233396.html
Reply to this comment
by jaxstephens January 2, 2009 7:53 PM PST
Interesting that you even spend your valuable time reading CNET articles and posting comments to articles if you dog on it so much.
by myles taylor January 2, 2009 8:27 PM PST
I didn't think they were going to be able to do it. I hope they use some of that money to hire new people and expand.
Reply to this comment
by MAL313 January 3, 2009 9:06 AM PST
I wouldn't call Wikipedia misinformation; the site itself does a pretty good job of explaining what it is, and is not. Wikipedia is dangerous only to the lazy users who see it for more than it is. I refer friends often to this pretty good explanation of it:

http://www.findingdulcinea.com/guides.topic__ss_categories_ss_technology_ss_Wikipedia.xa_1.html
Reply to this comment
by January 3, 2009 10:20 AM PST
I absolutely love Wikipedia. It is one of the best things the internet has brought us. So many times, professionally and leisurely I found Wikipedia the best starting point on a topic. The guys who started this should win a Nobel Prize. Just the best site in the internet that benefits people around the world, and it is a non-profit!
Reply to this comment
by Enginez January 3, 2009 12:34 PM PST
A huge banner asking for money, at the top of every page... Why not have ads instead? I figure it wouldn't be so bad if registered users could opt-in to having Google ads on the site. Google ads could actually increase the usefulness of the site, but I guess that would provide the Foundation with too much surplus cash...
Reply to this comment
by Siebrut January 4, 2009 3:26 AM PST
I think if the people can opt-in the ads to donate the Wikimedia Foundation, they will click the ads a lot...
Because they were thinking it can help Foundation.... But this is actually not allowed by Google's Adsense.
by loose_screw January 3, 2009 1:09 PM PST
I just checked power.com, and facebook has been removed as a login option.... Looks like the lawsuit threat worked after all?
Reply to this comment
by loose_screw January 3, 2009 1:10 PM PST
Oops, wrong article. Meant to respond to this article:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10130543-2.html
by Jyakotu January 5, 2009 6:13 AM PST
Wikipedia is the best site EVAR!!!
Reply to this comment
(17 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

Most Popular

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.