Comments on: What Gmail does better than its competitors
Does Gmail perform better than its competitors on a number of levels? Don Reisinger thinks so.
Does Gmail perform better than its competitors on a number of levels? Don Reisinger thinks so.
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Try doing that with Gmail.
The only reason I sort by name/or subject was to make it easy to find a collection of someone's email. Now I just search for 'from:whoever@somewhere.com' and I've found them. Or actually more likely I just type in the address or part of it or name or even any word that I vaguely remembered from the email.
GMail also has a paid option: Google Apps Enterprise Edition. More expensive surely, because you get more than email, and you need a domain name (but surely everybody needs one anyway...)
You didn't mention what you find 'more' on Yahoo?
SPAM!!! and lots of it
That annoying missing piece is heavily offset by the free IMAP access and the excellent spam filtering though
The odd part is that I opened an gmail account about two years ago and never use it. I've gone back to look at it about once a month and there are thousands of messages in the SPAM folder. How is this possible?
I do not think this suggests users prefer the "old" method over Gmail's method. My belief is that users only know how to use their mail program. They have invested in it and know how to use it. For many users this is a huge accomplishment for them as most are not necessarily tech savvy. I would guess most have no idea that Gmail provides this functionality.
I, however, do not favor the old convention. After years of having my email forwarded to a Gmail account (that was authorized to send as my real address), I recently moved the entire operation to Google Apps to host my email. What an awesome experience! Of course, having IMAP is huge, but the migration was relatively seamless.
I always like to hear what others have to say about Google products. Mainly to see if they "get it" or not. You obviously do. Thanks for the article.
BUT HOW DO YOU G-MAILERS DEAL WITH not having folders?
I get newsletters which i wanna read later, personal banking emails, emails from my family and other stuff. I want to be able to reduce the amount of emails in my inbox, and the best way is to move emails to subject catergorised folders; your family emails to a folder called 'family', and banking emails to 'banking' and so on and so forth.
How do gmailers handle not having folders? How do you manage having on giant listing, you always search by filters?
Why can't there be folders?
G Mailer Jason
I have been using Gmail since 2002 and I could not be happier. I don't give a damm that it is still beta, or that it "reads my mails" ... who cares? it works, it never goes down, is super fast, it searches any mail in seconds, so I don't have to create complicated folder structures. I just archive the mails, and then I search them.
By the way, one killer feature no one have mentioned: you can use keywords in the search box. For example, if I want to see mails sent by Joe, I just type "from:Joe" (w/o quotes) and voilą! Other keywords are in: , has:attachment, subject: , to: and many more (check the help).
Another thing: you don't have to sort by subject, you just can look for all mails with a subject (e.g "subject:sales" will get you all the mails about sales).
In summary: gmail rocks, and I just cry for all other email users who don't know better :-)
My inbox is still full of multi subject emails and labelling is tedious and unreliable.
Foe example:
Say i label everything in my inbox related to banking, cool! I can click the label and it retrieves all those emails.
But if i miss one or two banking emails and do not label them they are still hidden soewhere in 55 pages of inbox.
If i had folders i would not have 55 pages pages in my inbox, i would have one page and i would say "Hey these two banking emails have not been filed, they belong in the 'Banking' folder.
So labels you can lose something easily. Who feels like labelling there 2500 emails?
The essence of how gmail's inbox works still bothers me. I will never be convince labeling is reliable as the only way to double check if all items have been catergorised is to go though item-by-item and double check.
1) You can do a search with the subject / sender from your bank. Then you can select all the mails and label them
2) You can add a rule (super easy) so that any mail sent from your bank will be labeled automatically
Basically, you should just archive your mails! This way they are in not in your inbox anymore and you can still find them searching by subject: or anything. Remember, you simply cannot lose any mail in Gmail, search is as easy (based in the same technology) as with google. My girlfriend uses Hotmail and everytime she has to search for a mail she never finds it, it is really bad. Not in Gmail, really.
Ok you have shown me what others do.... excellent. I previously was using my archive for old emails (like 6 months or more) and didn't think to use it to store emails i really need and are recent. Now i will just archive each week and label everything as it arrives.....
This actually now means i really love.
- by freewill42 December 18, 2008 1:01 PM PST
- So far I have not seen a comment about Firefox and Ad Block Plus add-on feature; so you can have no ads on any page you visit, unless you specify allow. Also, there is an add-on to let you customize Google, & you can check no ads in many of the features.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 4 pages (97 Comments)To me, the ADBlock Plus feature is why I use Firefox over Google chrome, but I still use gmail.