Version: 2008
  • On TechRepublic: Five super-secret features in Windows 7

Comments on: Social networking quirks that annoy me (and maybe you too)

Social networks are great, but things like constant updates and site crashes can irk even those of us willing to admit to our addiction.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by SebDavies December 15, 2008 1:20 PM PST
100% agree that apps should be organised better on FB!
Reply to this comment
by Pete Bardo December 15, 2008 1:54 PM PST
Hey Don, you're an addict. Maybe you should check yourself into rehab? But, other than that, I'd probably agree with you on your comments. My own solution, I only check Facebook maybe once a week, usually resisting invitations for any apps, MySpace maybe once a month, and Twitter once in a lifetime.

Then again, with sites like Facebook and MySpace, downtime is bliss. Most of my friend requests invite me to see their naked pictures on a different website--and their pictures aren't even there anyway. :(
Reply to this comment
by mikehyms December 15, 2008 2:20 PM PST
Its all about how you manage SNSs and other media - just like RL encounters see
Mariann Hardey's Blog
http://properfacebooketiquette.blogspot.com/
Reply to this comment
by DoesWhat December 15, 2008 2:43 PM PST
Didn't downtime contribute to Twitter's success?
Reply to this comment
by dd13reis December 15, 2008 2:54 PM PST
Interesting point. I guess it sort of did. But I also think that if it lasted much longer, Twitter would have become a joke and no one would have paid attention anymore.

What do you think?

-Don
by bwvla December 15, 2008 2:56 PM PST
How about that just once you got into a site all of your friends scream about how thats old school and you need to be on the next thing.

The endless requests of people you don't know that want to be your friend so they can try to sell you something. Can't they screen out solicitors?

Or the endless notifications you get from friends regarding the latest silly application d'jour. Most of these in the guise of some cute game, but really are just designs to float you through as many ad filled pages as possible.
Reply to this comment
by punterjoe December 15, 2008 3:27 PM PST
I empathize with many of your points, but I have no problems with Google's endless betas. It seems preferable than many unbaked products prematurely rushed to market in a desperate attempt to monetize. Not to get metaphysical here, but some might argue that life is the ultimate beta. ;)
Reply to this comment
by dd13reis December 15, 2008 5:03 PM PST
You don't think the Gmail beta is a bit much? It's ridiculous -- time to get rid of it and go with the real thing. Unless, of course, if Google has something crazy up its sleeve. If that happens, then I might be more willing to let it go.

-Don
by Jyakotu December 16, 2008 6:20 AM PST
But yet, Google rushed its Chrome browser out of beta just a few days ago. They need to keep this trend going with their other products. After all, GMail seems perfectly stable to me and I use it daily for emails. Time for it to come out of beta, it's been way too long.
by socialnetworkingsoftware December 15, 2008 3:59 PM PST
i agree with the downtime issue...omg, use Rackspace already.
www.megastarmedia.com
Reply to this comment
by drpr December 15, 2008 7:20 PM PST
It's a bit unreasonable to be upset with a social networking service because you can't find someone you know little about. Why is it Facebook's fault that you know nothing about "Tom Smith" besides his first and last name? Would you be just as angry at the White Pages for your lack of knowledge?
Reply to this comment
by Alhan_Keser December 15, 2008 10:48 PM PST
The apps are the reason I can't stand Facebook anymore and Gmail still in beta? Is that really necessary?
Reply to this comment
by Jyakotu December 16, 2008 6:19 AM PST
LOL @ using the GMail logo for Inordinately long beta periods. But that's been bugging me with Google products for awhile now. GMail has been around since 2004 or 2005, if I'm not mistaken, and it's still in beta why? Seriously, it's okay if the final product still has a few bugs in it. That's why companies release different version updates. Google just doesn't seem to get this concept.
Reply to this comment
by MDoyon December 16, 2008 12:22 PM PST
It drives me nuts when social networks go down... especially when I'm in the middle of doing a million different things on different sites on different computers. BUT, what we have to remember about these networks is that they are FREE to use. If I had to pay for a site that went down an average of 30 hours a year, I would unsubscribe. Many of these social networks are still in the first 2 years of operation. Things will get better...I hope.

Cheers,
MD
Reply to this comment
by carwaterguide December 22, 2008 12:17 PM PST
Try these sites if you want to waste some more time and money

http://RecordOnlineGuide.blogspot.com
Reply to this comment
by Maria_1_1 March 4, 2009 6:16 AM PST
donīt forget http://www.elegime.net
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

The yogurt makers of tech: Gadgets to avoid

Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.

Google wants to unclog Net's DNS plumbing

The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.