Comments on: Complex Power.com tech bridges social networks
A useful concept marred by a confusing interface, the site lets you access your social networks (including Facebook) as well as your IM networks in one place.
A useful concept marred by a confusing interface, the site lets you access your social networks (including Facebook) as well as your IM networks in one place.
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Stakes are high as Google attempts to maintain one of the Internet's greatest cash machines while pushing into new and risky markets.
Android event set for Jan. 5
The gift frenzy over Zhu Zhu Pets leaves some power sellers feeling like they've just run a marathon--but the steep price tags lead to some impressive profits.
First off, is there such a thing as a "power networker"? There are people who register profiles on as many mainstream sites as they can, but they tend to spend their time on only a few key ones (the ones they get the most attention on) and is managing a Facebook profile AND YouTube profile really such hard work?
Secondly, niche networks are the future and Power.com will find it hard to keep up with all of them. It also needs to use somthing like OpenID and OpenAuth to ensure that the interaction between it and and those networks is as seemless as possible.
I've long though a network aggregator services would be a great social media launch page, but it needs to have cross-site authentication with it, as well as enabling users to move their social graph around networks as they move, so they don't have to build a friends list from scratch.
I am not sure Power.com has all it needs to be successful, other than a great domain name -- in fact, I'd suggest that's the only reason it's getting the exposure it is.
Ian Hendry
CEO, WeCanDo.BIZ
http://www.wecando.biz
- by 232323234 October 6, 2009 7:25 AM PDT
- no comments
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(4 Comments)