Comments on: How widely used is Chrome? More than I expected
In two months, Google's Chrome rose from nothing to 3.6 percent of browsers used to view CNET News. It's less common in the mainstream though.
In two months, Google's Chrome rose from nothing to 3.6 percent of browsers used to view CNET News. It's less common in the mainstream though.
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
Photos: Unboxing Nexus One
faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.
I use Google Chrome every once and a while and I really like it. There are just still some things that are not compatible with Chrome right now that I have to switch back to Firefox to use.
Therefore after years of trying other browser I ALWAYS go back to Firefox.
Still, occasionally I hit a site that expects IE or Firefox, and I have to switch for that site. Microsoft's Windows updates pretty much require using IE.
You'll see me on Internet Explorer when I'm visiting from work, mainly because they don't generally install better browsers and don't let us do it, either. I suspect that's the principal reason you see as much IE as you do on a tech site, given that techies almost universally use everything BUT IE. And, this is coming from someone who otherwise likes Microsoft and even endorses Vista. Granted, I don't feel IE is neccessarily bad, it's just that everyone else is better, and Microsoft really needs to do better about dropping proprietary pets like "Silverlight" and focus on keeping up with everyone else. Google is about to do to them what they've done to everyone else.
Seriously, I tried Chrome. I was initially very impressed by its speed, but was ultimately dismayed by its complete lack of support for anything remotely resembling an ad blocker. (Well, Google lives on advertising, so I guess I just wasn't thinking too clearly when I installed it.) I also noted, eventually, that my disk drive seemed to spin quite a bit as long as Chrome was running, even if I let it sit open but idle, as though the thing was indexing my drive or drives. I make no claims there, and am not prepared to pursue the matter. Regardless, I scratched Chrome, and told Google why I was doing so in the process.
So, back to FF and IE, in that order. FF with the NoScript and Adblock Plus add-ons, of course -- they slow it down considerably but without them, it is really no better than IE 7. The IE Tab add-on for FF helps with compatibility at a lot of sites, but I still need and use IE for some sites and/or tasks. That's a lot of add-ons bogging down the FF experience.
So, here's the rub: by the time Google gets bogged down with integrated (never) or add-on support for things like ad-blocking and selective script-or app-blocking, it will then be no better than IE or FF in any significant regard. Yet, it will still be plagued with the ever present privacy concerns associated with using nearly any Google application. Chrome then becomes little more than a Google Clown Car, something they had some fun with and drew some attention with, something they briefly threatened the security of the ring masters and lion tamers with, a toy they shook up the market with for a while, if only because it needed a bit of shaking up.
whereas it releases all its competitor's bread and butter as open source ?
I would have to say Safari is the worst browser out of Opera, Chrome, Firefox and Internet Explorer.
That's rather a dramatic failure than a success story. Chrome jumped to 1.5% within days, just to drop to under 0.74%, continuously sliding in popularity after its first release.
Given the Google brand, all the hype and active non-stop promotion to 10s of millions web users (Chrome is actively marketed at youTube and other sites) it is a big failure story. No other browser in history got the same advertising and publicity backing as Chrome did. No other browser was so actively pushed and advertised. And despite all the Google power, it keeps sliding.
they spy on you, and cant be trusted, i would not use google for anything except totally harmless searches.
i would NEVER use Gmail, or any of their office apps.
they screwed FOSS and everyone they can, not too mention the limiting of data in china .
The sooner google is out of business the better.
I am a MicroSoftie at heart , but Google I must admit , this Chrome browser is even better that their search ! Chrome will make the others go back to the drawing board , or die. It is THAT good.
PS>I find it interesting that Google never hesitated one bit in releasing a Linux version of Google Earth. Yet, they are strangely quiet when it comes to releasing Chrome for Linux...
I use Ubuntu and I'm quite happy with Firefox, so I'm in no hurry to get Chrome.
- by fspieg November 29, 2008 6:35 AM PST
- Way to many banks and commercial sites will not accept Chrome. Obviously do to security concerns.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 4 pages (100 Comments)