Comments on: YouTube videos go HD with a simple hack
Want to host high-definition videos on YouTube? No problem. Just get your copy-and-paste skills ready because all it requires is changing the video's URL!
Want to host high-definition videos on YouTube? No problem. Just get your copy-and-paste skills ready because all it requires is changing the video's URL!
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
When this was announced last week, that was all explained.
&fmt=18 is the one you want.
Actually clicking "higher quality" at youtube or changing the Playback setup in my accound does enhance the quality a little, but it's still nowhere near when i add &fmt=22 to the URL.
When i click the HD embed here its best quality. When i click on it while playing i am referred to the youtube page and get the video in lower quality (also when clicking on High quality). When adding &fmt=22 to the URL i get the HD quiality back again and can also watch it full screen.
I'm using FF3
&fmt=22 is only if it was recorded in HD. That's why most of the videos if you type &fmt=22 it will just take it back down to lower quality.
&fmt=18 is the one that most people should use. This increase bit rate, and increases the quality of the videos. (don' t have to record in HD to use &fmt=18) Try it on any video right now!
"Hmm, doesn't seem to work with any videos I tried. Example: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QdPrB_lcpBc&fmt=22. However, the old version of &fmt=18 does work. Comments?"
This is correct. It is <b>&fmt=18</b> (not 22) that forces YouTube videos into HiDef, and it's been that way for a long time, long before this article was published. I've never seen 6 ro 22 work, and unless or until they change it, clearly for all, stick with &fmt=18.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTiL7ZQglF8&fmt=18
--VS--
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rTiL7ZQglF8&fmt=22
The 22 seems a bit better than the 18 for this video, however, 22 still does not seem to work for most vids, whereas 18 does. It's likely just a matter of time or else it will only be for new special uploads from here on.
There are two different sources for both these video's, that is they are not rendered from the same source:
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mgan4rt7ZHw&ap=%2526fmt%3D22"
and
src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mgan4rt7ZHw&hl=en&fs=1"
You can see the difference plainly enough. Don't believe me? Go to your View (firefox) menu and select 'Page Source' on that menu while viewing this article and see for yourself.
I have included a snippet below...
<p>HD Version:</p>
<object width="630" height="380">
<param value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zlfKdbWwruY&ap=%2526fmt%3D22" name="movie" /><param value="window" name="wmode" />
<param value="true" name="allowFullScreen" /><embed width="630" height="380" wmode="window" allowfullscreen="true" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mgan4rt7ZHw&ap=%2526fmt%3D22"></embed></object></p>
<br />
<p>Regular version:</p>
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mgan4rt7ZHw&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Mgan4rt7ZHw&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
/facepalm
- by Chronis67 November 30, 2008 2:16 PM PST
- I tried watching the HD video and I noticed the frame rate was studdering. So I check my CPU usage and it was in the 80 and 90 percents. I have have a AMD Athlon XP 2800+, so while it does have a few years on it, I would have though it should have been powerful enough to watch an HD video.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 1 of 2 pages (33 Comments)