Comments on: Wikipedia gears up for flood of video and photo files
New hardware needed to support online reference service's push for more media.
New hardware needed to support online reference service's push for more media.
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
It does sound exciting. I'd like to see Wikipedia ONLY use Ogg Theora for video, as it might provide a reason for Microsoft and Apple to support Theora as a video standard. It would be trivially easy for them and wouldn't cost them anything in licensing fees.
Wikimedia only has Ogg Vorbis sound and Ogg Theora video because every other codec is patented up the wazoo. But it's presently #8 site on Alexa and #4 on ComScore, so basically it's up to Apple, Nokia etc. to catch up with sites their users want to use.
Presently, *anyone* can play the Ogg files - the site has a Java applet which plays them in any browser supporting Java, which is all of them. Java's open source itself, by the way. It's just that Firefox 3.1 - and Opera - will play them natively in the browser itself.
- by faboumen November 23, 2008 6:11 AM PST
- While I agree that addition of more photos is good, video is not. The third world is still having a terrible time coming up to speed with the internet, and video will kill it. Even if you have fast internet, wikipedia's servers are so slow now, they are about to get a whole lot slower. All this new hardware is going to require more cyberbegging, for what videos that 3/4 of the world can't access?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)