Version: 2008
  • On MovieTome: The 10 worst movies of 2009 so far!

Comments on: Going solar? Seven sites map your plans

Consumers and business owners seeking to install solar power can turn to these Web sites for interactive maps and cost estimates.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by Manhattan2 November 20, 2008 8:16 AM PST
Keep fixed solar panels off of any rooftop. All these sites and the manufacturers that are recommending putting solar panels up on your own roof in our opinion are making a dire mistake. Solar will never make it's mark in renewable energy if that is the approach. Look up Solar Transfer for the future of solar power. The information is coming soon. The answer will be seen in 2009. Maybe the next administration will be more open to real change, real answers. Mitch Govansky
Reply to this comment
by November 20, 2008 10:04 AM PST
Mitch,

Your site is full of typos and amateurish to say the least. There is a lot of conjecture with no solutions. It would seem to me if you have the miracle cure, you would bring it forth instead of masking it under this feeble attempt of brilliance.
Reply to this comment
by Manhattan2 November 20, 2008 10:14 AM PST
The devices we will capture solar energy with are brilliant. Phase 1 and 2 of the Solar Transfer solution are simply being put out there to give people the choice. A choice to wait for real solutions. 2009! New administration that talks about change. We will see if they are ready to make the bold moves that need to be made in renewable energy capture.
by dtuman November 20, 2008 10:50 AM PST
Elsa: Thanks for the Zillow mention in this solar article and thanks for spending the time to dig out sources for consumers on going solar. I hear it's quite expensive, but it's about time we all started thinking of alternative solutions. It will be interesting to see how Obama reacts to renewable energy sources. We did a post on wondering if the White House will go solar: http://www.zillowblog.com/will-the-obama-white-house-go-solar/2008/11/
Reply to this comment
by Manhattan2 November 20, 2008 11:14 AM PST
Please email us if you hear anything about putting Solar Panels on the White House. If that happens we will know that there is no hope for renewable energy. Panels on the White House is the last thing we should do. Just showing off to your neighbors that you have solar panels on your roof does not make you green. SolarTransfer@aol.com
Reply to this comment
by November 22, 2008 1:00 AM PST
in 2003 solar panels (9KW) were installed by evergreen solar, using SMA inverters.
nobody seems to have noticed...?
by turbosol16 November 20, 2008 12:33 PM PST
SolarTransfer is run by Sensible Ventures LLC. If you take a look at their site they have no products that actually exist.
Reply to this comment
by Manhattan2 November 20, 2008 1:00 PM PST
2009 release on many of the products. We found it only appropriate to release our findings about Solar Power early to help those that are trying to purchase solar units. Give them a chance to delay their purchase for devices that will generate 2-4 times more energy for the same invested dollar. Extend that over 30 years and you will see why we found it appropriate to hint at what is to come. The Earth and those truly interested in efficient green solutions will benefit from our work. Email us if you want the early release information. Not trying to sell you anything like others! Run the numbers! Mitch Govansky
Reply to this comment
by willdryden November 20, 2008 6:58 PM PST
That's why there are no electric cars. Got to wait for the next great battery. But the battery never gets here or is too expensive.
by isykal November 20, 2008 3:55 PM PST
The Solar Transfer website says a lot about ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. It looks like a scam that tries to capitalize on slightly uninformed investors and consumers.
Reply to this comment
by Manhattan2 November 20, 2008 7:05 PM PST
Not selling anything. Just getting the word out about the errors in the current programs. This is not a situation where a little bit of good will do. The numbers do not add up for enough people to jump into Solar Power with the current configurations. There is a better way.
by rowdyguy124 November 21, 2008 5:50 AM PST
Manhattan2, That article on your website was written 3 years ago! It asked to wait "a year or two". So where are your findings or proposals at? It's all but 2009!!! This planet doesn't have time to wait any longer. There will always be a better solution down the road with anything. It's called progress. Luckily for you the home equity loans many would use to make an investment like this will likely wait till the end of Obama's term of the start of another term 4-6 years from now when the housing market is again stable. But people would jump on a CHEAP and effective solution. What ever happened to the conductive solar paint we saw on tv years ago? This R&D needs done now! I'd gladly paint my roof with the stuff or use inexpensive panels $1-$4 a square foot, to save on my energy bill and reduce CO2 levels.
Reply to this comment
by b_baggins November 21, 2008 9:12 AM PST
Solar on the roof could be cool. If you can get the price down to about $1200 installed. Without tax subsidies (that tax money comes from somewhere, which is why Calif. is 48 bln in debt)
Reply to this comment
by grand2--2008 November 21, 2008 9:50 AM PST
First, we need to get a few facts straight. When the media uses the words "solar", "solar panel", or "solar collector", they only mean the high visibility photovoltaic cells that produce electricity. They aren't referring to the real solar enery technoogy that produces hot water.

PV is currently not cost effective for home owners. Its cost is sky high, equivalent to paying $25-$40/kWh.

Solar thermal is equivalent to about $6-7/kWh. That is below most electric rates.

PV systems can be economical in one scenario - grid distribution, where the utility is an active partner is distributing the electricity, eliminating battery storage costs, and load management. In many places, utilities that don't want this competition have fixed the prices they pay as low as possible, to discourage competition.

Solar thermal systems are durable work horses that can run 25years with little care (not zero, just little). That beats the lifetime of all conventional heating devices, including furnaces, water heaters, boilers, etc.
Stirling thermal engines that produce electricity are up to 31% efficient, beating the ~12% efficiency of PV by a factor of 3.

So, if you need heat - restaurants, car washes, laundries, hot water and space heating of homes, pools, spas, process hot water baths, etc., then thermal solar is the preferred way to get green energy.
Reply to this comment
by BG4807 November 30, 2008 6:17 AM PST
In the area where i live the govt. is subsidizing wind mill power. It is a good atempt of not being oil dependant, but the problem is french companies own them. GET IT? So lets go solar, subsidize american built solar here at home. Make home based solar products and subsidize home owners who want to help. The state i live in will give you 1$ for every 3$ of power you put in the grid. The research ive done will cost an average home owner 15-25 thousand dollars to build, it would take 10-20 yrs to break even on this investment (solar has a 20 yr lifespan) there is no incentive....too expensive....no payback..How about dollar for dollar and make it so joe plumber can get his investment back after its paid for then give 1$ for every 3$... might work..................
Reply to this comment
by jdukvoac January 2, 2009 5:44 AM PST
Manhatten2, are you serious? Because after looking at your so called "web site" I would have thought it to be some 3rd grade weekend project! You have absoluetly NO relevant information. If your business is hinging on this website alone, then you will be out of business very very soon! There is another web site called "Blacklight Power" at http://www.blacklightpower.com which if it's not some sort of hoax, has the potential to change our planet on a very real and large scale. There is some debate as to wether or not the technology discovered is possible, from a physics standpoint, but evidently it has been demo'd and they have their first commercial contract with Estacado Energy in Mexico. I first heard of them when they were featured on CNN during my luch hour. Interesting stuff.

As far as this "super" breakthrough that Manhatten2 is jabering about, Rowdyguy124 nailed it on the head when he said "This planet doesn't have time to wait any longer. There will always be a better solution down the road with anything. It's called progress." We are seeing an ever increasing demand for solutions, and hopefully companies such as Blacklight can help in attaining these goals. We are slowly and steadily ravaging our planet, and we need to start reducing our negative human impact on this floating home of ours, or we may not have a home for very long. And anyone who thinks that we are just going through a "cycle" or that there is no such thing as global warming, then keep your head in the sand.

Sorry for the rant.
Joe
Reply to this comment
(16 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

The browser battles go on and on

roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.

3G wireless still holds promise

The next generation of 4G wireless may get all the headlines, but advanced 3G technology will likely dominate services for the next few years.