Version: 2008

Comments on: Microsoft ditches old Hotmail design; users gripe

Company says redesign of Hotmail is faster than the earlier "classic" and "full" modes. But some users want to turn the clock back.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (44 Comments)
by MosX November 6, 2008 11:39 AM PST
This doesn't suprise me. Users will complain about ANY change, no matter what it is or how much it's designed to help.
Reply to this comment
by fcg1502 November 6, 2008 11:54 AM PST
I've been using hotmail for about 8 years and this is the by far the best design they've had. I can also tell that it is faster. We use the LiveOffice e-mail system in my office and of course our secratary complained about the change when they made it. People will always complain. As she said, "why can't they just leave well enough alone." Well, if it's better, then by all means change it.
Reply to this comment
by catierocks November 30, 2008 5:35 PM PST
yeah thats wat its lik with me
by squished November 6, 2008 12:17 PM PST
Overall I'm pleased with the changes. It's definitely faster and that's most important. My main complaint is how the font size is unpredictable and usually bigger than I prefer. For instance, in Firefox 3, I'll zoom out on the page (ctrl+wheel downward), then click the Inbox link and the text returns to default size. Also, the left navigation bar could use back color to set it apart. But again, I like the new changes overall. The live theme preview is slick!
Reply to this comment
by Shoogle2 November 6, 2008 12:20 PM PST
People still use Hotmail? Sorry, couldn't resist. :) Seriously though, I agree with MosX... Any changes, even for the better, will generate complaints because people don't like seeing something new.
Reply to this comment
by bonniesue826 November 14, 2008 8:20 AM PST
Yes, people still use hotmail. What email do you use that is so lofty and far above us? A full 11% of all internet traffic at any given time is either hotmail or IM. The new interface is faster, but I am peeved at typing a lengthy email and hitting the "SEND" button, which normally sends the mail to the intended recipient. It not only was never received; I can't even find a copy by searching my email folder. I liked the other better because I am used to it. I will get used to this over time, but overall the Windows Live thing is being pushed on those of us with Microsoft passports. It's hard to tell what is free and what is not. There are new things requiring one to "subscribe" to. Gmail is starting to look more like a realistic alternative for simplicity's sake; The only problem is that Google saves everything and has TMI about all email clients and those of us who prefer the google search engine.
by irperez November 6, 2008 12:26 PM PST
People need to get over it and accept new technology. Fine, complain, but be happy that at least the company is moving forward. I'm sure Microsoft will address alot of the concerns with future fixes and adjustments. But please, to complain so vocally is so rediculous. Get over it and move on.
Reply to this comment
by catierocks November 30, 2008 5:35 PM PST
yeah thats tru
by geoffgarcia November 6, 2008 12:39 PM PST
The recent Hotmail changes are hit/miss on Firefox 3.1 Beta 1
95% of the time I try to do anything the browser hangs with the yellow "loading..." box displayed in the lower left corner. This forces me to use IE - ugh!!!!
My FF install is free of addons with the exception of YSlow.

In IE 7.0 it works as intended.

As someone that has used Hotmail since 96-97 (and see little reason to jump to gmail - the only competition) this is a big problem for me and one that has me considering a change in provider.
Reply to this comment
by monkeyfun14 November 6, 2008 1:31 PM PST
Have you ever considered that the issue might be that your using a beta browser? And not Hotmail
by timber2005 November 6, 2008 2:27 PM PST
Not working in FF 3.1 Beta 1... hhmmm, something about the word "beta" clues me into to the possible cause of your issues. Can you blame MS for only support FF1, 2, and 3.0 at the moment, since tomorrow FF3 Beta 2 could come out and need it's own little tweaks to work?
by catierocks November 30, 2008 5:35 PM PST
yeah thats same wid me
by geoffgarcia June 18, 2009 1:58 PM PDT
Being in a beta mode shouldn't cause these types of issues.
Regardless, I'm off beta and it still fails about 15% of the time with the same bug
by Forsaken4Eternity November 6, 2008 12:51 PM PST
Ugly, slow, convoluted, the list keeps going.

Stopped using hotmail in 2001. Junk is the main problem, given that same junk keeps appearing in inbox over and over again, no matter how many times you indicate it is junk. Since gmail launches, been nothing but a happy customer.
Reply to this comment
by Vegaman_Dan November 6, 2008 8:23 PM PST
If you stopped using Hotmail in 2001, then you're nearly eight years behind to really comment on what the current system offers, right?

I don't use Hotmail at all so I can't really say yay or nay on it.
by MaximeLM November 6, 2008 1:07 PM PST
Sucks, does not work with Google chrome. I don't care how faster it is, if it does not work with chrome, I don't want it.
Reply to this comment
by rimesparse November 6, 2008 1:16 PM PST
It works perfectly fine with Google Chrome for me. In fact, it's quickest and looks best on Chrome, ironically. It's strange you're having problems.
by brian.lee November 6, 2008 1:17 PM PST
in terms of web mail my preference is

gmail/yahoo mail (tied)
hotmail
.mac (This is utter crap for UI)
Reply to this comment
by inachu November 6, 2008 1:32 PM PST
Many times changes are bad especially if users are retired and have memory problems then it takes multiple more clicks to do the same things.
Reply to this comment
by tech_crazy November 6, 2008 1:44 PM PST
The new hotmail sucks.

1)The reply window gets screwed up into a narrow column using Firefox (looks passable with IE).
2)The folders list is now too short and have to scroll
3) Still doesn't offer the ability to select/sort messages based on flags - read/unread etc.
4) Searching through mails is still pitiful.

Other problems persist - spam, unavailability, pre-mature logouts, etc. Overall, no improvements, just eye candy and actually lost a few features. Typical Microsoft.

Had been using Hotmail for more than a decade now (when it was not even Microsoft). Maybe its time to ditch it.
Reply to this comment
by yipcanjo November 6, 2008 1:45 PM PST
I'm so far very impressed with the speed of the new Hotmail. Very fast, and it makes my Yahoo! Mail (new interface) feel somewhat sluggish. Still, I prefer the interface of the new Yahoo! Mail, and have preferred that look and feel since the Oddpost days -- the folks behind the Yahoo! Mail update.

I've tried GMail on several occasions, but I *just cannot* get used to the interface. It's fast -- I'll grant them that -- but feels almost "toyish" to me, and very unnatural. Just my $.02, of course.

If I weren't happy with my Yahoo! Mail, though, I would probably switch back to the new Hotmail!
Reply to this comment
by TV James November 6, 2008 2:05 PM PST
People are still using Hotmail?
Reply to this comment
by oldscarecrow November 6, 2008 2:25 PM PST
People still make pointless posts?
by November 6, 2008 2:07 PM PST
Simply unacceptable. After 11 years using Hotmail everyday, I just had to drop it this week. I didn't see the previous forced update (merely a year ago) as an improvement, but it was somewhat acceptable, or at least didn't deserve the hassle of switching. This time it fully deserves it. Being ugly is one thing, not working is something else. I did many tests of this new site this week, and it only works well with M$IE and Safari. Doesn't work properly under Opera, SeaMonkey nor even Firefox!! So much for Linux users... Yes, I managed to make my new Hotmail work under IE behind WINE, but I definitely could not bear:
1) downgrade to using IE
2) waste 500 MB of RAM to start a WINE+IE everytime I want to check my e-mails

So many people have been trying to convince me to switch to Gmail for so long, but I always resisted... now I finally did and I'm truly happy with it so far. And I'm especially proud to have switched since I realized that Hotmail has blocked POP, IMAP and WebDAV in the past few months to trap their users, fearing the danger of losing too many users to Gmail and Yahoo! Mail (which have both become better than Hotmail). They know they are falling behind, and they didn't choose the way to face the threat.
Reply to this comment
by JCPayne November 6, 2008 4:18 PM PST
If you don't like it... Switch providers.... Thats all. Nobody forces you to use it.
Reply to this comment
by musicmate007 November 8, 2008 4:59 AM PST
Switch providers...? you then have the bother of informing all your contacts you have changed. Hotmail worked fine in the last format, this one is awfull...'if it aint broke..don't fix it
by amarkj November 6, 2008 5:05 PM PST
Yea why all the complaints? Leave if you don't like it. I logged in today and it looks great and it's faster loading on my system then it was before (Using XP Pro SP3 with IE7).
Reply to this comment
by chuchucuhi November 6, 2008 8:32 PM PST
oh bah to those people I'd much rather have one simpler faster interface and one that also more full featured if I so choose.
Reply to this comment
by inachu November 7, 2008 5:36 AM PST
I miss using PINE........... great unix email program.
by El_Mikee November 6, 2008 10:51 PM PST
I like it... What i donīt like is that, now i canīt use it on the iPod touchīs Safari broswer... :-(
I hope someone writes an app for that...
Reply to this comment
by pwdattempt9099 November 7, 2008 5:09 AM PST
My biggest gripe about the new version is the absolute wasted space on the page, such that i am now reduced to a 5.5cm tall text box to type my emails (not everyone has a 20" inch screen on a laptop). And on top of that, sometimes the advertisement on top is not a long thin banner, but rather a chunky almost square ad... thus I was reduced today to a 2cm tall text box to write emails. Overall, because of this, I hate the new design.
Reply to this comment
by inachu November 7, 2008 5:34 AM PST
thats what most software companies do when they take over things.
Make it slow...... then change hardware then optimize new software to work just for that hardware to make the old desiign incompatible or slower.
This new stuff is just as fast as the old version was when it was still being hosted on linux when hotmail was sold to microsoft. I still wish to add *@microsoftsites to my apam rule but they prevent that. so now I hardly use their service.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (44 Comments)
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.