Comments on: Speed test: Google Chrome beats Firefox, IE, Safari
Google's Chrome trounces Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Safari on speed tests for JavaScript, a key foundation for rich Web apps. But Google picked the benchmarks.
Google's Chrome trounces Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Safari on speed tests for JavaScript, a key foundation for rich Web apps. But Google picked the benchmarks.
Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Faster than everything ......
Josh
www.privacy.mx.tc
"When will AdBlock be available for it?:)"
when Google decides giving up in some billions of $$$
It is also noticeably raw and unsophisticated when it comes to usability and design. Speed alone will not not sway me from FF3 - a split-second difference at the expense of appearance and convenience is not enough.
But I will stick with FF for a while. Chrome sacrifices personalization for its raw and lean approach. For example in Chrome there is no way to add a Print button to the icon bar. Imported bookmarks are stuck in a folder "Imported from Firefox". Moving them out and into the general bookmarks folder is overly complicated (first drag to icon bar, and then back into the "Other Bookmarks" folder etc).
But as mentioned above. Add a few little features and Chrome will be pretty tough to beat.
Companies spend heavily to establish and maintain brands. Google has just imposed itself between consumers and businesses. Direct navigation has now become proprietary search, whereby Google uses its discretion to filter out web addresses and domain names that it deems less relevant.
I object and I hope you do too.
No, if you try a text based it quite faster. But that something any product has to live with : the balance between performance and convenience.
Anyway, Chrome was very well engineered. Either from the marketing or the software itself point of view.
I like cartoons. :) It seems that bottlenecks were well identified and worked out. And this mania of using algorithms to do things (like the test suit in Chrome) is wonderful.
Google did already a good job in raising the bar for the competitors. And preparing the field for the OS agnostic, bowser centric computing.
Giantiago David.
Google browser? Thanks, but no thanks.
http://dev.chromium.org/developers/how-tos/build-instructions-os-x
Also, my Javascript speed test results:
http://www.degutis.com/blog/google-chrome-javascript-speed-test-results/
http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10030888-92.html
- by sparcdr1 September 3, 2008 10:45 AM PDT
- Not quite, sorry.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 3 of 5 pages (121 Comments)http://a.weaponofmassdestruction.us/sunspider-javascript-benchmark.html
I did this test using the Webkit's official benchmark, just added Chrome (XP) to the list. Safari 4 developer preview on Vista x64 is the fastest Windows browser, and Safari 4 is the fastest on Mac OS X. (Leopard) Safari 4 developer preview on Mac OS X is the fastest browser of any platform with a cool 2129ms, with Safari 4 developer preview on Windows x64 SP1 pushing 2716ms.
I'm a nobody, you shouldn't trust big guys. Take a look for yourself, thanks!