Version: 2008
  • On TV.com: Why Is Everyone in TV High School SO OLD

Comments on: When the 'wisdom of crowds' turns on itself: IMDB edition

A look at a case where the much touted "wisdom of crowds" philosophy fails us.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by lmasanti July 28, 2008 12:02 PM PDT
"Eat sh*t. Billions of flies couldn't be wrong!"

One thing is democracy, another one, quite not related, is the "crowd".
Reply to this comment
by ArgentOwl July 28, 2008 12:32 PM PDT
?It is not worth an intelligent man's time to be in the majority. By definition, there are already enough people to do that.? ? Godfrey Harold Hardy
Reply to this comment
by The_Decider July 28, 2008 1:13 PM PDT
What a bunch of tripe.

For starters, there is no such thing as "Web 2.0", it is a meaningless marketing buzzword.

The crowd has not and never will be based on wisdom. It is based on the least common denominator, path of least resistance, insert another cliche here. One only has to look at popular music, TV, movies, sports, etc to realize that neither wisdom or intelligence factors into it except on the rarest of occasions.

For more proof, look at Windows, Office, console games, etc.
Reply to this comment
by ghostofitpast July 28, 2008 2:08 PM PDT
As "Web 2.0" is used more as a marketing lure than as a concept that communicates anything, "wisdom" is used more because it sounds nice without describing anything with specificity. The whole area of judgment and decision making has been contaminated with confusion for centuries (and Kant's attempt to straighten things out did not help much). There is even confusion over the difference between EFFICIENCY and EFFECTIVENESS of judgment. There is no general rule as to whether or not the judgment of a crowd is better or worse than that of an isolated individual. There are only those who peddle their snake oil and those gullible enough to buy it!
by jeolmeun July 28, 2008 1:24 PM PDT
Expelled was in a similar situation. At the moment, 2,555 (58.9%) voted a rating of 1 for the movie. Google: Expelled IMDb
Reply to this comment
by dlk955 July 28, 2008 2:07 PM PDT
I still agree with Tommy Lee Jone's line from Men In Black - ?A person is smart. People are dumb.?
Reply to this comment
by michaelkpate July 28, 2008 2:56 PM PDT
There have been several instances of this system breaking down in the past, one notable occurence being the infamous Digg HD-DVD revolt. On occasions like this, a mob mentality tends to take over a very vocal and active segment of a community, greatly skewing the product of their collective "wisdom."

I am not sure how a whole bunch of users pointing out the ridiculousness of a DMCA takedown notice over a set of mathematical constants is an example of a mob mentality. Digg did what they felt they had to do and the users only showed why the whole exercise was pointless.
Reply to this comment
by harrisonh1 July 28, 2008 3:30 PM PDT
@michaelkpate I'm not saying that the revolt wasn't justified. I think it's pretty clear, however, that the the Digg HD-DVD example is certainly an instance of mob mentality. Someone noticed that Digg was taking those links down and the group of people grew and grew until you had a mob of people, acting together, flooding Digg with stories about the code and making the site otherwise unusable.
Reply to this comment
by PrettyStuzz July 28, 2008 3:58 PM PDT
Erm, just like The Dark Knight's rise to the top of IMDB, American Beauty also displaced The Godfather in 1999 for a few weeks only (though if I recall correctly, it displaced GF2, which was IMDB's top-rated film).

(The GF movies lost much of their sui generis beauty owing to HBO's Sopranos series, so it's not surprising, however sad, that they've declined and will continue to decline in appreciation.)
Reply to this comment
by celric July 28, 2008 4:54 PM PDT
How soon we forget. The same thing happened with Return of the King. A lot of the top 10 suffered during that period and films in the 11-20 range like pulp fiction and the good the bad, and the ugly crept into the top 10, while Citizen Kane and Dr Strangelove fell out. Eventually, this more or less corrected itself and Godfather returned to the top.
Reply to this comment
by civildisobedience July 28, 2008 7:58 PM PDT
The Digg HD-DVD revolt was justified. Civil disobedience has a long and great history in America, and it was a great way to say f you to our would-be corporate overlords.

Note: I did not participate in the Digg revolt, and wasn't even a member at the time, but I very much supported it, as Digg deserved what it got.

This and the Dark Knight IMDB crapola are hardly comparable.
Reply to this comment
by scrollinondubs July 28, 2008 10:37 PM PDT
the 4 preconditions necessary for WOC to work are Independence of Judgement, Diversity, Decentralization and Aggregation. IMDB doesn't have the first one and it's arguable that the second one is minimal. That's why you see the "mob mentality" effect.

sean
Reply to this comment
by oneoclock July 28, 2008 11:48 PM PDT
wisdom of crowds could not possibly break down because there is no such thing, that which doesn't exist in the first place cannot break down.
Reply to this comment
by xibuc July 29, 2008 12:18 AM PDT
The Godfather hasn't always occupied first place. Shawshank has held first place in the past decade, by my recollection, several times and for extended periods. Roger Ebert even wrote about it (albeit nearly a decade ago -- Oct 99) here: http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/19991017/REVIEWS08/910170301/1023

"When the Wall Street Journal ran an article about the "Shawshank" groundswell in April 1999, it was occupying first place in the Internet Movie Database worldwide vote of the 250 best films; it's usually in the top five."
Reply to this comment
by Kev Orng July 29, 2008 8:16 AM PDT
Hey, go to wikipedia and look up "LYnch mob" and "The Tyranny of the Majority" and then we can move ahead with this discussion on the wisdom of crowds.
Reply to this comment
by heymikey July 29, 2008 2:45 PM PDT
The article is ********. Movies are highly subjective and people will vote for a 10 for very different reasons. It just so happens that about 75% of viewers liked it enough to vote it a 10 for whatever reason (not necessarily mob mentality).
Reply to this comment
by HeyNonnyMouse August 5, 2008 12:04 PM PDT
To be honest the whole thing was caused by The Godfather fans on that site. The Dark Knight went in at number 1 with relatively few votes but over enthusiastic voters giving it a 10, it was then you had The Godfather champions giving The Dark Knight a 1 to have their film back at number 1. I didn't take long to figure out why there was an increasing amount of 1 votes for The Dark Knight, basically its fans retaliated in kind. All very childish, but your article is inaccurate when you imply who initiated the fiasco.
Reply to this comment
by run-jimmy-run August 25, 2008 9:39 PM PDT
@HeyNonnyMouse I loved The Dark Knight and I've paid to see it several times in the theater, but the 1's given to The Dark Knight were not from "Godfather fans". The 1's were a kneejerk reaction from people everywhere who recognized that although The Dark Knight was great, it doesn't belong above great classics. It was the natural reaction of the crowd trying to correct the system. Giving 1's to The Godfather was childish.
Reply to this comment
(18 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Webware

Say No to boxed software! The future of applications is online delivery and access. Software is passé. Webware is the new way to get things done.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Webware topics

With eye to the future, try raw photos today

Raw photos are a hassle compared to JPEG. But if you like photography, the list of their image quality advantages is long and getting longer.

Inside the Apple, er, Microsoft Store

Although Redmond's foray into retail bears a big resemblance to Apple's approach, Microsoft has added some distinctive features to draw casual PC buyers and techies alike.