Comments on: iPhone 3G: What we didn't get
The iPhone 3G brought many new promises, but it didn't give us a lot of things we expected.
The iPhone 3G brought many new promises, but it didn't give us a lot of things we expected.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
I hang with a multitude of 20, 30 and 40-somethings all day, everyday in a highly technical environment that is heavily reliant on reliable communication. Nobody I know uses MMS. Apparently, MMS is a regional thing dependent on carrier pricing or outside of my workplace demographic.
How can you even call it a cell phone???????
Wasnt really looking into the iphone, but hell, I like new gadgets.
Not even gonna take a second look seeing that it doesnt have MMS.
WEAK!!!!!!!!!!!!
Let's see: 2.5 times faster internet (with the best mobile internet experience), true GPS, 3rd party apps, push email, thinner, better battery life AND HALF the original price (though I do see how they'll make it up with the data plan). And AT LEAST 75% of the people posting are "disappointed". Gimme a break; this device had to be trancendant to please most of you.
Most of the phones you are citing have the features you're whining about, but are missing features that the iphone has. And most of them COPIED the iphone's end-user interface, and DOESN'T do it as well.
And some of those features are trivial at best. MMS is something that Apple can update with software, and it does seem like a simple thing to address. But seriously, I don't know anyone over 21 that uses MMS. Hell, facebook will take care of nearly all of a twenty-somethings' photo sharing needs. Copy and Paste? Seriously??
The one omission that I cosign as being a show-stopper for people who want them is video recording. If you don't care about that, and you still have an issues with the phone, you probably didn't want it anyway. There are plenty of fine smartphones for you out there from Blackberry, LG, Palm, Samsung, Nokia, etc.
I own a ipod touch. I love it to death. I turned down a iphone to get it. The iphone disappointed me initially due to space and that 2 year contract. I don't like at&t. Now to speak for myself, I am not anti apple. I think they have the potential to become the greatest computer/mp3/phone etc...company ever. However, what holds them back, and this why you see so many "i'm disappointed" comments, is because they don't listen to the consumers. Hell, they don't even ask. Let me put it this way, if apple decided to make a car, and they made there's with no radio or no brakes, but gave you tv's in the headrest and 22" rims...and people complained about it...because every other car has it right....would we still be anti-apple?
- by Newsdork June 9, 2008 6:11 PM PDT
- I'm a HUGE apple fan. I have a Macbook that I treat better than some people treat their kids. I would like nothing more than to get rid of my Windows Mobile Treo 750 and get an iPhone, but right now I need three things: video, MMS, and cut and paste. It's simple as that. All these arguments about 'nobody over 12 uses MMS' etc are dumb. Don't substitute the word "nobody" when you really mean "I" don't use... I'm 33 years old. I, along with a great many of my friends, and my 60+ year old parents, most of whom do not use smartphones, send MMS to each other every day. It's great you can email a pic from your iphone, but if the people you're sending it to don't have smartphones, it's useless. Some idiots on here say "you don't NEED MMS" or "you don't NEED cut and paste". Yes I do. And the fact that 90 percent of crappy brick and flip phones have those features should be a starting point for any phone, let alone the world's most advanced smartphone.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- by pyropenguin June 11, 2008 12:35 AM PDT
- ....maybe you could send good ole Steve a video and picture of the photo finish...oh, but he probably couldn't get that on his 'amazing' iphone.
- Like this
-
Showing 3 of 11 pages (321 Comments)Sorry Steve, you had me for two hours, then you lost me. I thought this was the day the iPhone was going to gallop past my buggy, finicky WM Treo, but in the end, it's the Treo by a nose.
You ALMOST had me this week Jobs, but again you've only proven one thing; you just barely give the consumer, the people, what they want. We get mediocrity while you line your pockets to satisfy yourself and the board. Then maybe later we'll get just a little something else. I'm with Newsdork...I'm in the 30 something age category and probably send and receive roughly 50 MMS messages a month. I know A LOT of people from 16 to 42 that use MMS. For a product to be truly good, one would think it would not alienate itself on such basic features of communication. I'll admit the iPhone has some pretty neat advanced technology and features, but still has left out the obvious basics that a majority keeps asking for.
I hate AT&T's network. They say they have the fewest dropped calls? HA! It's because they connect the fewest calls. If Jobs could get the iPhone right I would probably switch carriers though, just for it's(iPhone) abilities. But again, Jobs has only given us just a little of what is possible...love that PLASTIC case too!! Come on Jobs, wake up already!!
W E A K!!!