Comments on: Goldmund's $17,000 Blu-ray player
We have no idea why it costs so much either.
We have no idea why it costs so much either.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Here's an interesting article comparing a PC with regular DVD drive Vs high end DVD player units...
"ATI and nVidia crush high-end DVD players"
http://tinyurl.com/ysucgg
Cheers,
Rajesh.
Here's an interesting article comparing a PC with regular DVD drive Vs high end DVD player units...
"ATI and nVidia crush high-end DVD players"
http://tinyurl.com/ysucgg
Cheers,
Rajesh.
Certainly these companies cater to the snob faction. The minimalist approach in turn is supposed to incite notions that there's NOTHING that needs to be adjusted with this device, for at this point in its place-holding spot in the space/time continuum it's the best its makers could make it be, latest (for THIS week) bleeding-edge connectivity or data standards be damned. It's the "ultimate" device, locked down to some imagined highest standard at the moment it was conceived. Doesn't matter how [i]yesterday[/i] it already is, as long as it's the [i]absolute best[/i] yesterday it could possibly be. And as long as production is at best in the hundreds of units, then WHY NOT give it a five figure price tag? This is from the land and peoples that gave the human race Rolex and Patek Philippe, after all.
That said, I have to wonder where the eff the tubes are supposed to go...
Certainly these companies cater to the snob faction. The minimalist approach in turn is supposed to incite notions that there's NOTHING that needs to be adjusted with this device, for at this point in its place-holding spot in the space/time continuum it's the best its makers could make it be, latest (for THIS week) bleeding-edge connectivity or data standards be damned. It's the "ultimate" device, locked down to some imagined highest standard at the moment it was conceived. Doesn't matter how [i]yesterday[/i] it already is, as long as it's the [i]absolute best[/i] yesterday it could possibly be. And as long as production is at best in the hundreds of units, then WHY NOT give it a five figure price tag? This is from the land and peoples that gave the human race Rolex and Patek Philippe, after all.
That said, I have to wonder where the eff the tubes are supposed to go...
listen to. When Naim, Arcam, Linn, or SimAudio offer a player, it might be worth
looking into.
listen to. When Naim, Arcam, Linn, or SimAudio offer a player, it might be worth
looking into.
Of course this is why shame's like Stereophile never use ABX testing when reviewing or comparing.
Of course this is why shame's like Stereophile never use ABX testing when reviewing or comparing.
- Expensive electronics can be economic in the end
- by troypreble March 2, 2008 5:17 PM PST
- In 1998 I bought the first Sony DVD player, the S7000 for $1,200 and you know what, I still use it. Sure do. I see it this way. I used my S7000, very happily I might add because for 10 years. It cost me $120 per year and I still use it for playing CD's, so there is still value in the product. Not that I am comparing a somewhat mass produced top of the line Japanese product to this product but my point is that quality electronics never go into retirement. I still love my S7000 and have only recently upgraded to BluRay because I bought an HDTV. One other thing, when all your equipment is top of the line, you can see a difference. This piece paired with a cheap tv, no you are not going to see a difference.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)