Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: Apple plans 2GB iPod Shuffle, cuts price on 1GB player

The new matchbook-size digital music player, with double the flash memory space, will sell for $69, while the 1GB model will now go for $49.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
'bout time !
by tcd311 February 19, 2008 9:54 AM PST
everybody else has gone 2,4,8gb on the teeny tiny players , but apple hasn't ! it's about time ! and their dropping the ridiculous price on the 1gb also ! it's funny really , they've been selling the 1gb shuffle for a awhile now and people have still handed over $70 just to get it ! yet you can get a sandisk clip or a zen stone with 2gb for half of that stupid 1gb ipod shuffle price !
Reply to this comment
Took the words right out of my mouth...
by Jasmineflower February 20, 2008 11:57 AM PST
...seriously, I was about to write just that. It boggles my mind that the Shuffle sold at such a (comparatively) exorbitant price for as long as it did. Even now, there are options that are a better value: Sansa Clip and Zen Stone.
I like the shuffle
by tommays February 19, 2008 11:42 AM PST
If you get a bit dirty in life and scratch screens :) the Shuffel is for you


How had is it remenber the songs you load on a player ?


Tommays
Reply to this comment
Sandisk clip is a lot better
by crave_hd February 19, 2008 5:14 PM PST
Hmmm, let's see, at about the same price or less,
you get a screen, 2gb as well, fm radio, a microphone,
true drag-and-drop (through a firmware upgrade), LOUD volume, excellent sound, playlists, the ability to delete from the player itself, and of course a clip!

so why would I choose an ipod shuffle over the
way-better Sandisk clip? I wouldn't.

Sandisk also has a one-year over the counter exchange.

I've had mine for 2 months and I love mine.
Reply to this comment
How big can you go without playlists??
by fleurya February 19, 2008 7:43 PM PST
I suppose there are a select few out there who wouldn't mind setting 500
songs to shuffle, but not me. To me, it's just too much music for something
that can't be organized and navigated by albums and playlists. I have a fairly
large library, but I wouldn't want to randomly shuffle through such a big
chunk of it. Maybe a few albums at the most at one time. And forget about
finding a song you want in a mass of music that big.

What would make that much space usable? Some way of navigating playlists.
You wouldn't even need to add buttons. Just do a double-click or something
to move up and down your playlists. Something very simple that would make
the little Shuffle much more usable.
Reply to this comment
2 GB? Are you kidding?
by cyberDJ-2038765336053745013836 February 20, 2008 6:53 PM PST
What? Is Apple in a time warp?

4-8 GB is more up to speed with current jump drive capacities.
Wake up, Steve!
Reply to this comment
(6 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.