Comments on: Apple fights back with Aperture 2
The company touts better speed, a streamlined interface, and new editing tools for its high-end software for editing and cataloging "raw" photos. Plus: A price cut to $199.
The company touts better speed, a streamlined interface, and new editing tools for its high-end software for editing and cataloging "raw" photos. Plus: A price cut to $199.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
adopter, I feel burned.
I put up with no updates for a year, then the lackluster 1.5
update. Additionally, the lack of prosumer RAW converters (I
don't always take my best gear out to the kids' soccer game,
some love for prosumer Fuji RAW would be nice) and the general
lack of communication about this software from Apple has been
anathema to most photographers.
If there was an easy way to get all my old work out of Aperture
(that didn't require me to buy another couple of disks) I'd move
to Lightroom today.
envelope again. Apple knows how to make software work with
you instead of against you. No need to read a manual to use the
thing. 5 stars from me.
envelope again. Apple knows how to make software work with
you instead of against you. No need to read a manual to use the
thing. 5 stars from me.
- Apple irrelevant
- by gggg sssss February 13, 2008 6:30 PM PST
- when you consider the vastly larger number of potential Windows machine users. Since lightroom and PS run on the Mac, why would anyone want to buy Apple-only software in 2008? Any Apple "feature" can be cloned by Adobe in a heartbeat. Plugins? Adobe wrote the book. How hard would it be to open up LIghtroom to the huge number of Photoshop and After Effects plugins?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
-
- A dying light
- by Thomas, David February 14, 2008 7:05 AM PST
- provides narrow vision in the dark. Simply put, that is where your
- Like this
-
- Actually, plug-ins are difficult
- by Shankland February 14, 2008 5:48 PM PST
- Because of Lightroom's nondestructive editing methods, it's actually *not* a simple matter to move Photoshop plug-ins over to Lightroom.
- Like this
-
(7 Comments)mind is. If anything, Apple is quite relevant, and every respectable
person in the industry would agree.