Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: Microsoft squashes talk of dual-boot XO laptop

Microsoft and the OLPC are working on a laptop that would be capable of running Windows and Linux, but it's not a dual-boot system. Sort of.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
"Microsoft squashes talk of dual-boot XO laptop"!
by Commander_Spock January 10, 2008 5:52 PM PST
When are some people in this world in which we now live understand understand the nature of the "beast": it is like been there in the "trenches of great expectations" and realizing after all the "promises" you are an "abandoned child" by both your father and your mother.

Long Live The "King" and "OS/2" (With Boot Manager Intact). They say - "Experience Is A Great Teacher". ;-) !
Reply to this comment
abort, retry, fail?
by sanenazok January 10, 2008 6:07 PM PST
is there any way for you to restate what you wrote using sense and fewer misguided "quotes" It's fun to put things in a way that OTHERS understand as well ;)

Oh I think you're the OS/2 guy. I wonder where's the Linux guy? Heeeelloooo we have a story about MSFT waiting for your bashing. Where are youuuuuuu?? Can't wait to be told that some meaningless technology is superior to another meaningless technology...
View reply
fess up time
by jackhidary January 10, 2008 11:55 PM PST
thank goodness msft owned up to its lack of cooperation with olpc. let olpc be free of the strictures that bind the developed world.

XO is a feral beast - ready to serve the 5 billion people who have no access to a wintel monstrosity.
Reboot please
by hdubya January 11, 2008 12:02 AM PST
Can someone reboot Spock?
View reply
I have 2 legit boxes Of OS/2 warp
by inachu January 11, 2008 6:51 AM PST
Neither of them can install correctly.
Spoke to some ex OS2 geek and he told me I had to download an OS update to make it work.

Selling retail OS/2 Warp that did not work out of the box kinda was really sad.
Microsoft kills multiboot ability.
by inachu January 11, 2008 6:54 AM PST
Another reason to stick with Windows XP and Linux or Windows 98.
Rubbish to think only Ultimate Edition can be used as a virtual machine.

MS squeezing the cash cow yet again.
Reply to this comment
Now they are starting to show their real intentions...
by tfosorcim January 11, 2008 7:37 AM PST
'...Microsoft hinted that in the future, Negroponte might not be the best spokesman for anything about the XO related to the software giant [Micr$oft]. When it comes to the progress of the Windows-based XO, "Microsoft recommends contacting the company directly for any further updates," it said in a statement.'

Microsoft has no intentions of letting OLPC operate without M$'s "guidance".

One serious technical tidbit M$ would rather not talk about, or have you know: ALL Windows versions have always been the classic, textbook example of the Virtual-Memory operating system. This means that it's (the OS) so huge that the operating system can't be held in memory, and that Windows thrashes the hell out of the--required--hard drive, CONTINUALLY. This has only gotten much worse with each new Windows 'innovation'.

There's only one problem with using large Flash (SSD) drives for Windows: Flash drives have a certain 'lifetime', i.e., only a limited number of writes may be performed (even though this number may be in the millions, it won't take long for a SSD to be rendered useless by running Windows).

Prof. Negroponte:
Get away from Microsoft as fast as you can. It has no honorable intentions, and the hardware won't work.
Reply to this comment
I agree 100%
by inachu January 11, 2008 7:42 AM PST
Microsoft needs to get rid of the swap file asap!
Virtual Memory / Swap File
by sanenazok January 11, 2008 9:22 AM PST
Is there an OS that doesn't use a swap file and virtual memory? I remember having a swap file was THE REASON I upgraded to Windows 3.1 back in the day. Also swap files can be turned off completely in almost all versions of Windows (I think the exception is Windows 2000 which requires a 2MB swap file).

It's unrealistic to have a dual boot system with a small hard drive, it doesn't matter what type of technology is involved. Also to limit the effect of write cycle problems on SSD drives these devices have wear spreading features. Given that the linux OS on the OLPC systems HAS a swap file (prove me wrong) this is a total non issue and looks like FUD really.
View reply
Microsoft is not the only OLPC opponent
by wataylorcnet January 11, 2008 11:06 AM PST
Microsoft opposes OLPC because they don't want millions of kids learning a PLC that doesn't use Windows. What's worse, the rulers of the countries where most of these kids live are tyrants. This article
http://www.scragged.com/articles/disrupting-tyrants-with-web-3-0.aspx
why the LAST thing a tyrant would want is a bunch of OLPCs in kids' hands.
Reply to this comment
(14 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.