Comments on: Coming in 2008: GPS-enabled cameras?
The founder of GPS chip designer Sirf Technology believes some cameras next year will know where they're taking photos, partly through new technology that can get a location fix faster.
The founder of GPS chip designer Sirf Technology believes some cameras next year will know where they're taking photos, partly through new technology that can get a location fix faster.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
The gps info is embedded into the image so that the location of the photo can later be shown ON A MAP. You dont have to know what the actual coordinates mean.
You would think this would be patently obvious to anyone who read the story... but I guess not.
1. Take picture.
2. Upload to Flickr.
3. See pictures mapped. http://www.flickr.com/photos/87916290@N00/map/
wherever I go. It involves a somewhat laborious process of
turning the GPS receiver on and off and waiting to get fixes. At
least with a separate GPS receiver, I can wait and take a fix
after I am through taking pictures, (I, primarily, take
landscapes, which hardly ever move... LOL)
I live in the Rockies and it is relatively easy to get a location fix
out here. It takes about twice as long to get a 3D fix, (which I
like to get). However, I was recently in NYC and could not get a
GPS fix, anywhere - even in Battery Park, where it seemed it
should be easy. The same limitations will apply with GPS
cameras.
GPS receivers use up batteries faster than you can replace
them. I cannot see how I would want to use my camera
batteries for something that won't necessarily work every time.
Unless of course, it actually detects what the location is tags it as "Westminster Abbey", in which case, it might be more useful.
This technology would requre a big database lookup (preferably online for the most up to date data) and that would mean more hardware on the cameras and, ultimately, additional costs.
Mahurshi
coordinates on film.
But as someone here said: what's the use for the average
snapshooter?
Megapixel camera. It's no DSLR or anything cool like that, but it is
easy and already integrated. So this is not like a hard to solve
problem here - it just takes the will of camera manufacturers to
integrate the GPS receiver into the camera.
prodID=1910&SEGID=425&tab=2&ajaxlink=1910
- There're some alternatives
- by cybertai November 29, 2007 10:31 PM PST
- Some alternatives:
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(16 Comments)1. Sony's GPS-CS1, I guess this one only works with Sony's camera
http://www.navigadget.com/index.php/2006/08/02/geotag-your-pictures-with-sony-gps-cs1/
2. ATP's Photo Finder, this one supports almost every camera, cool!
http://www.sciuridae.co.uk/technology/atp_photofinder_review.htm