Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: Target stores won't sell 'Manhunt 2,' ABC reports

The giant retailer decides not to carry the new Rockstar Games title because of its heavy violence factor.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
"easily unlocked"
by aurin90 November 6, 2007 6:49 PM PST
You made a mistake there. The content in question required you to hack into the game, which it a fairly difficult process.

You would NEVER be able to get at that stuff within normal gameplay or by using any kind of 'cheat-code'.

Also obtaining instructions to hack into the game would require internet access without parental blockers as the instructions themselves would have to include adult content to describe what they do. With access to that sort of internet access any person would be able to access a large amount of adult material, much easier, without the knowledge required to hack into a videogame.
Reply to this comment
Virtual Violence = Real Violence?
by maverick_nick November 6, 2007 11:18 PM PST
Millions of people around the world, including myself, purchase and play violent video games, and have been doing so for several years now. While I was safely at home playing these violent video games, all of those actual "violent" people were running around being their violent selves. I don't believe they played any video games.

I think that people should quit blaming video games, movies, and music for people being violent, but rather the loose nuts that were always the cause.
Reply to this comment
Virtual and Real Violence...
by Gordie_h November 7, 2007 9:07 AM PST
I know many people that use violent video games as a venting method, it prevents them from actually carrying out violent acts yet still people see video games as a pre-cursor to violent action. Personally I'd rather have a friend pick up a Mature or Adult only rated video game brutally murder virtual people than go out around the city and go on a man slaughter for real. Is it just me?
i dont see what the big deal is
by this1! November 6, 2007 11:19 PM PST
its just one retailer choosing not to sell something, they've decided that they rather loose money than sell this game. Good for them, ill just drive to another store and pick of the game there if i so choose.

If the game was banned for sale completely, then i could see what all the fuss is about...
Reply to this comment
So they buy it somewhere else....
by fred dunn November 7, 2007 12:02 PM PST
Whose loss is it?
Reply to this comment
When its rated M....
by Rimer November 7, 2007 1:09 PM PST
Don't buy it for your 8 year old, jesus... Simple as that. The ESRB rating is there for a reason, to tell you this game is violent and not meant for younger children and this is true. Normally violence like this would effect a younger audience a lot more then the targeted audience.

Also if you do buy it for your kid and they are 8 and they become a mass murdering man or women then you can really only blame yourself for giving your child a game rated 9 years more mature then they are. Also most younger audiences would not know how or have the resources or knowledge to easily hack the game.
Reply to this comment
To be honest...
by CortalUX November 7, 2007 6:09 PM PST
I really don't care.
Reply to this comment
(7 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.