Comments on: Is the Olympus E-3 dSLR unfashionably late?

Arriving late with its E-1 followup, the Olympus E-3's speeds and feeds match what you'd expect for an entry-level pro model. But is that enough this late in the game?

[evarten]

Incorrect specs.

The article says the D300 has a 9 pt. AF system but it actually has the same 51 pt. AF system that the D3 will have. I'm not sure how many of the sensors are cross type though.

Other than the splash/dust proof body, I don't see anything compelling about the E-3. You can get similar specs and a larger sensor in the Canon 40D or Sony A700 for $400 less or pay $100 more and get the superior D300. The Canon and Nikon don't have built-in stabilization but I'd gladly trade that for the larger sensor sizes. The 2x crop factor is the reason I don't like Four Thirds system cameras. The E-3 is great news for Olympus shooters but seems very ho-hum to the rest of the industry in light of the 40D/A700/D300. I might be more enthusiastic if the price tag wasn't $1700.

[make_or_break]

Late is better than not at all

I think it's good that Olympus has finally put a new rig on the market, particularly for new dSLR buyers. Choice is always great, and so is the subsequent competition that follows. For the 4/3rds crowd, it has to certainly be welcome news. Whether its specs are enticing enough to attract new buyers to the 4/3 way of life remains to be seen, but at least the system is still in the game.

As for whether anyone who's already invested in a Canon or Nikon ecosystem would ever consider switching, that's a moot point. Without some sort of profound tech advancement spurring on a need to switch (bayonet vs. screw mount lens, for instance), it rarely if ever happened during the heyday of 35mm film SLRs. I sincerely doubt that it would be any different now in the digital age.

[guswfla]

Olympus E-3 dSLR

Since the normal lens won't be available until the 1st quarter of 2008, how can they say that the camera is now available? Unfashionably late or not, you're looking at a list price of $4,000.00 for the body and a `normal' (zoom) lens: the f2.0 14-35mm SWD (28mm-70mm-equivalent) $2,299.99. Finally, the other lenses listed exceed the 2.7 :: 1 zoom ratio quality rule and have to be optically suspect.

[fionndruinne]

E-3 dead in the water

Not to bash Olympus, but I see this camera as not only late on the market, but priced to fail. I mean, the Canon 40D is a worthy piece of gear, and at a surprisingly more affordable price than the others. The Sony isn't special, but, well, it's Sony, so it'll survive. But the E-3 is priced above both of those, in line with the D300, and the D300 has just about smashed any competition with its array of features. Given the advantages of owning a Nikon system over the still-coughing 4/3 system, no one in their right mind (unless they've already dropped a fortune on high-end 4/3 glass) would buy the E-3 for its initial list price. Just look at the difference in sensor size between the two - APS-C 12MP or little 4/3 10MP for the same price - your choice.

[KentuckyRanger]

I purchased the E-3 back in Dec of 08 and all I can say is wow, what a Camera.
Everyone poo poo's the 10.1 Meg Pixel Censor but with almost 30 Years of Photography under my Belt and allot of experience with digital Photography as well as digital printing I can say that anything over 8 Meg Pixel is fine unless you really crop the heck out of your Photos or are planning on enlargements over 16X20.
At 12.1 Meg Pixel and a $3k Price Tag, the Nikon D-700 with 24~120mm Lens has to be one of the most over priced under achievers in my opinion.
When I went to purchase a dSLR I really wanted to like the D-700 but it was to clunky and the controls where all over the place, not to mention the included Zoom Lens was very unimpressive and has a very bad habit of Lens creep that I noticed while just playing with the Camera at the shop.

Don't get me wrong, I like Nikon, the old Nikon.
The only thing the Nikon D-300 or uber expensive D-700 has is a higher ISO and Noise is better handled at higher ISO's than the Olympus D-3, but who shoots at 6400 iso?
And besides that, the Nikon's noise levels are horrible at that ISO setting as are all dSLR Cameras.
Canon's EOS 1 Mark3 is through the Roof as far as price goes and a 21 Meg Pixel Censor, talk about overkill.
Unless you're going to be printing Billboards it's just crazy.

The People who continually bash Olympus either have no idea what they're talking about or they're big Nikon fans and have absolutely nothing good to say about Nikon's biggest competitor, this battle has been going on for Years and will continue until one Co goes out of business.

To call the E-3 an entry level wannabe pro Camera tells me that you know nothing of the Camera nor Olympus Cameras at all.

The only complaint I'd have is if I where an E-1 owner because the Two models came out so close together but the way I look at it, Olympus took comments and complaints from E-1 Owners and designed the E-3 to deal with the short comings of the E-1.
Of course if you want to sling Mud then lets look at Nikon's release Timeline of its latest Models.
The E-3 supports all Olympus Lenses including OM Lenses with an inexpensive adapter Ring so E-1 Owners will not be left out in the cold over the release of the E-3, it's just a newer Model and will not cause E-1 Owners to go Postal or jump to their death over it.

Since using the E-3 since Dec I've shot all kinds of subject matter, produced very crisp and detailed Photos up to 17"X22", even Cropped and they came out spectacular.
Got caught in several Rain Storms with no ill effects to the Camera and the Battery Pack lasts forever before needing charged.
The focus is so fast and accurate that you've taken the Photo before the subject gets away.
Exposure control is spot on and the Master 2 software gives you total control over ORF Images to the point that I have no more missed Photos because of over, under exposed Photos, Shadow or poor Color tone.
In my Mind the E-3 truly is a professional, affordable dSLR Camera ready for anything you can throw at it.
So it doesn't capture Video, I have a Camcorder for that...