Comments on: Intel breathless with Nehalem anticipation
At IDF, Intel's Pat Gelsinger barely restrains his excitement about the next-generation 'Nehalem' processors due in 2008.
At IDF, Intel's Pat Gelsinger barely restrains his excitement about the next-generation 'Nehalem' processors due in 2008.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
The world may have thrilled to the potential for a Google Phone, but what Google actually unveiled is its plan for a new smartphone world order.
Photos: Unboxing Nexus One
faq Worms, Trojans, and SMS attacks are risks for mobile phones, but the biggest practical threat to users is losing the device.
"We got our own Athlon."
Intel Wins Again!
Intel can afford to invest in project that could fail, AMD can't
Intel can trash all the processor that failed QA, AMD had to made them 3 core.
AMD needs back up. The story of David & Goliath may very well ends here
Everything has always worked as expected on the Intel Machines. I will never buy or recommend a AMD processor.
Ford vs Chevy. Competition is good and I wish AMD well, however, I an sold on Intel.
- by alban_read September 26, 2008 10:33 AM PDT
- How much time and damage to the environment (use of power and cooling) did the Pentium 4 fiasco cost?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(6 Comments)Why did it take so long for Intel to return to a sane design?
And now they finally copy a decent memory interface.
My core2 duo has a slower memory bus than my five year old Mac.