Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: A diesel Honda that gets 62.8 miles a gallon?

Honda expects to bring a clean-diesel Accord to the U.S. by 2010.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (54 Comments)
Honda Car
by Vonmaxx April 25, 2007 4:40 PM PDT
I want to buy one. Tired of paying 3.00 per gallon. The car I have
now gets 28 MPG on the interstate. At 2 1/2 times the MPG it
would not seem that bad.
Reply to this comment
No need for eco laws.
by Solaris_User April 25, 2007 5:06 PM PDT
Honda did this without any government force at all. They made a car that got great gas mileage on bio diesel fuel due solely to market demand.

Environmental Education not force. It stiffs the oil cobal too.
Reply to this comment
Not entirely correct
by ScottMo April 26, 2007 3:53 AM PDT
Honda developed this car to meet government regulations in a market that's important to them. To say that California's emission standards had nothing to do with manufacturers pushing technology to meet that standard is wrong. California set the bar high and the market rose to meet it because the was profit there. If this was Rhode Island setting the standard, no profit = no movement. Government does work (well, some of the time, anyway).
View reply
For the record...
by -fjtorres- April 25, 2007 5:32 PM PDT
That is an Acura TSX body in the photo, not a NorthAM Accord. The TSX is a left-hand drive version of the Japan-spec Accord. Its a bit smaller and more manueverable than the US-made Accords. If that Diesel can deliver power and handling comparable to what the TSX currently delivers *and* 60 MPG, Honda is going to have trouble meeting demand.
Reply to this comment
Partially correct
by floppydik April 28, 2007 9:32 AM PDT
YEs, it's a TSX body that is the EUROPEAN ACCORD. The car was first the Accord in Europe and N.A. Honda decided to rebadge and upgrade it for the TSX.

Regardless, I am excited that Honda is working on this clean, torque laden (something honda engines lack) diesel engine for the US. I believe diesel engines will make hybrids obsolete.
by slammed42 May 16, 2008 8:11 AM PDT
That's the Euro Accord body.
The body has nothing to do with power
Didn't most the the VW diesel vehicals get about 60 mpg last year?
by aka_tripleB April 26, 2007 12:54 PM PDT
I'm fairly certain that the website had claims that they reach well into 50 mpg at least. Now, Honda is claiming 62.8?

*Woopie-doo! You one up'ed people!*

Why is Honda get so much credit for minor improvements?
Reply to this comment
60 MPG VW? Please!
by gregsfc April 26, 2007 4:23 PM PDT
I'm as excited as anyone about modern, clean diesel autos, but these numbers are getting exaggerated. This sort of thing happened when hybrids first starting coming to market. Still yet, clean diesel autos, if brought to the U.S. in mass, could save us over one-million barrels of oil per day, and even more, if consumers really catch on to this biodiesel craze as I have.

I drive a 2006 Jetta TDI. I avg. 43 mpg, driving conservatively, and using B20 (20% biodiesel blended with 80% ULSD fuel). When one combines diesels with the use of biodiesel (which all diesels can use w/o modification), the potential for saving petroleum through the use of diesel automobiles, is tremendous.

The 2006 VW Jetta TDI gets an estimated, 36 city and 41 hwy for the 5-speed manual, while the automatic lists at 35/42. The average user, however, reports an average of 44 mpg with the 2006 Jetta TDI. Likewise, most other diesel models outperform the epa estimate in fuel economy.

The upcoming VW Jetta TDI/BlueTec is expected to get 45 mpg in a combined, city/hwy rating, which (if this is held up by the EPA) will be an increase of seven mpg over the 2006 model, while providing 40 more horsepower @ 140, and 59 more lbs of torque @ 236.

Consumers can expect to see this fifty-state complliant Jetta way before the Accord; the Jetta--around mid-Spring of 2008; the Accord--by 2010.
View reply
It is a whoopdy-do!
by gregsfc April 26, 2007 4:35 PM PDT
If one car gets 60 mpg and another car gets 50 mpg, that is a significant reduction in petroluem usage, greenhouse gas emissions, and a reduction on those individuals' wallets. As a matter of fact, that is a 20% increase in fuel economy; a 20% decrease in fuel costs per year; and an approximate, 20% decrease in CO2 output.

What if we changed that to two vehicles that got not so good fuel economy, and we compared a pickup that gets 10 mpg to a pickup that gets 20 mpg.

Would that be a whoopdy do? It's the same increase; ten mpg!
View reply
60 mpg VWs ?
by JazzzMann May 24, 2007 7:26 PM PDT
Don't know how anyone could get 60 mpg from a VW. My 2006 Jetta can get 50 mpg on the hwy if I don't drive too fast (65-70) and save the A/C. My goal is to one day take a trip where I can drive 50 - 55 mph on almost flat road. I might can get 55 mpg under special conditions. I get 40-42 around town.
There is NOTHING NEW here
by tao51nyc July 31, 2007 9:00 AM PDT
There was a 51mpg diesel VW Rabbit on the road in the US as far back as 1984. We tend to forget what happened the last time there was a gas crunch in this country. By the mid-80's there were over 40 vehicles available that got 35mpg or better. By 2004 that number had shrunk to 9. Why are we always reinventing the effing wheel?
by slammed42 May 16, 2008 8:10 AM PDT
Ok, so I haven't read all the replies, but your comment made me cringe. What companies advertise on their site and what cars actually achieve is completely different. I believe VW ran an ad in the 50s or something with a gutted, stripped Bug with a jockey. The ad read: Yeah, we can get 52.3 mpg. But we don't.
by slammed42 May 16, 2008 8:10 AM PDT
Ok, so I haven't read all the replies. What companies advertise on their site and what cars actually achieve is completely different. I believe VW ran an ad in the 50s or something with a gutted, stripped Bug with a jockey. The ad read: Yeah, we can get 52.3 mpg. But we don't.
Writer is confused!
by gregsfc April 26, 2007 4:57 PM PDT
quote: "Since then, petroleum manufacturers have devised cleaner diesels that only emit about 15 parts per million of diesel, down from hundreds of parts per million."

Whoa!!! This is so wrong I can't believe they printed it!

Petroleum manufacturers didn't do anything. The car manufacturers designed exhaust treatment systems and engines that can cut particulates of matter 90%, and nitrogen oxides 90% from levels found in the cleanest, 2004 diesel cars. As a prerequisite, however, the engine manufacturers needed the EPA to mandate 15 ppm diesel fuel which had been the standard throughout most of the world for almost ten years. This lower sulfur fuel allows automakers to apply these advanced systems. The 500 ppm, sulfur diesel would destroy these exhaust treatment systems and was keeping the auto industry from offering the U.S. diesel cars.

The petroleum industry fought this for years, even as they knew it was the right thing to do for the environment. Now, companies like Shell are airing commercials giving themselves credit for bringing cleaner fuels to America, when in fact, they held out until they were forced to market the clean fuel here.

15 ppm sulfur is not a measure of output as this article states. It is the level of sulfur in the fuel and does not have anything to do with the level of sulfur allowed out the tailpipe of diesel cars and trucks.

PM-.002 grams per mile. NOx - .07 grams per mile, fleet avg. Those are the requirements that the automanufacturers have to reach that will allow fifty-state emission compliance through 2010. These numbers are more commonly referred to as tier 2, bin 5, and will be the same in all fifty states by 2009.
Reply to this comment
by queenieamerica September 29, 2008 1:30 PM PDT
I would like to expound on the comment that corrects a misstatement. First diesels have been available in the US for years from VW, they are not sold in states that have CA emission standards. The new generation of Diesel engines require low sulphur Diesel fuel (federally required in the US since Oct 06). Mercedes Benz and VW have new diesel engines that meet 50 state emission standards but both require Bluetec or Adblue fluid to meet the standards (it's a urea based fluid that is injected in the exhaust). Mercedes requires up to 8.5 gallons of the fluid that require trips to the dealer at approx. 10K miles intervals. Honda uses a different system that creates urea in the exhaust to control emissions. No added fluid! More diesel engines are coming from other auto manufacturers over the next couple of years. Whether the US embraces them we have to wait and see. The reason the Diesel Honda looks like an Acura is because the Acura TSX is based on the European Accord which is available in Diesel form. Thank you.
Bad math??
by tcam000 May 1, 2007 5:46 PM PDT
I find it hard to believe that, that Accord can get 62.8 MPG. Currently, that Accord sells in UK with a 2.2L i-CTDI (diesel engine) which can attain 52.3 MPG combined.

Now 52.3 MPG is based on Imperial gallons which is 1.2 US Gallons. Now to convert that number to US gallons, you should do 52.3/1.2 = 43.6. Now if you do the opposite and do 52.3 * 1.2, you get 62.76 which rounds to 62.8 MPG.

Coincidence that this new car gets exactly 62.8 MPG, a 44% increase in mileage, when announced in the US market? I think not!
Reply to this comment
no math rather than bad math
by Nepenthes August 2, 2007 4:03 AM PDT
Figures from the following website suggests that the imperial mpg value was simply not converted to US mpg values. It seems the highest value of 62.8 mpg (Extra Urban!) in the table was quoted.

http://www.carpages.co.uk/honda/honda-accord-review-part-1-16-04-05.asp

Economy [ Manufacturers Figures ]

Urban 39.8 mpg
Extra Urban 62.8 mpg
Combined 52.3 mpg
Who cares about "power"?
by mikeshafer May 3, 2007 3:35 PM PDT
Do most Americans really need the ability to go from 0-60 in 5 seconds? 10 seconds? My 2003 Jetta TDI is peppy enough with its 1.9L turbodiesel engine. I think acceleration loses out when gas prices are $3.50/gallon. Plus you can run it on biodiesel which is domestic and often times cheaper now that the oil companies are robbing us of even more money. All last summer in Seattle, biodiesel was 20-30 cents cheaper per gallon than diesel!

Bring on the diesel cars. Sign me up--I'll take one. And while you're at it, bring the MINI Cooper D (diesel) to the USA! 64.2mpg!
Reply to this comment
corolla verso diesel
by pizzajoevt June 2, 2007 4:18 AM PDT
The corolla verso may be effective at getting americans out of their suvs,High utility and seating for 6 plus very high trim levels(passkey entry,pushbutton start,headrest mounted dvd,180 hp diesel)with great gas mileage would be a great fit for us.Also the yaris diesel gets 60+/imp gal.it comes in verso trim too.
the real theif
by pipefitter72 June 13, 2007 5:44 AM PDT
you should find out how much profit per gallon the oil company makes versus how much tax per gallon the government takes.Maybe then you will figure out who the real theif is.
View all 2 replies
Ethanol and hybrids can kiss my exhaust
by tekintl July 11, 2007 12:55 PM PDT
I tired of ethanol getting government subsidies when Diesel is clearly better. Diesel has more energy per gallon than both gasoline and ethanol. Plus, diesel can be made simply from waste veggie oil in your own backyard. I drive a TDI Jetta right now but dont see why I have to wait to get a TDI Honda when they've been driving them in Europe for years. 60 MPG Batteries not included!
Reply to this comment
This is awesome news for automotive & environment industry!
by sagargemini July 31, 2007 1:48 AM PDT
Hey, this is a great news for automotive industry and very positive for the highly polluted environment! Indeed a great relief!! Check out more such interesting stuff at: http://niche-technologies.blogspot.com. Thanks.
Reply to this comment
Diesel cars.....
by Magnum 44 August 2, 2007 1:33 AM PDT
It had taken USA a long time to find out about diesel for cars. There was an abortive attenpt in the 1980's by GM to put a diesel (converted 350 block) into a Cadillac & Oldsmobile, but they mad a hash of it and put everybody off diesel for ever! I got one of these engines in '86 and put it into a Range Rover - fabulous. 44 miles per gallon on motorways, and bags of power. I live in Spain, and nobody (sensible) drives anything but diesel. There are many mid-sized sedans here that do 50 mpg, and with terrific power. Look hard at diesel, guys, it's good.

Magnum 44
Accord?
by iluvmysh July 31, 2007 7:45 AM PDT
Looks like a TSX to me?
Reply to this comment
European Accord
by m00c0w25 July 31, 2007 8:06 AM PDT
The car pictured here is sold as the Accord in Europe and the Acura TSX in America. Honda needed to use a larger car for the Accord in America to compete with other mid-size sedans/coupes.
TSX = JDM/European Accord
by bbellwfu July 31, 2007 8:38 AM PDT
The Acura TSX in the USA is a modified version of the Japanese/European Honda Accord.

More background: http://www.autozine.org/html/Honda/Accord.html
irony
by sjaaksken July 31, 2007 9:17 AM PDT
How ironic, this article was placed on digg and two stories lower you can find this article

U.S. vehicles rank bottom in world fuel efficiency...

http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN3024959820070730
Reply to this comment
Combine this with a hybrid...
by SiXiam July 31, 2007 10:15 PM PDT
I like it how it is already, but what if you combined a small efficent diesel with battery tech and plugin capabilites.

Think about it:

You plugin your car in at night so you use less fuel and need to travel to the gas station less, so getting the diesel isn't as much as a drag (considering stations aren't as popular as petro or gasoline).

What would the fuel economy be with a 60 mile trip like that..

40 miles on electricity
20 miles on diesel

Amazing it would be I tell you!
Reply to this comment
Sure!
by momdogz August 1, 2007 8:18 PM PDT
I bought a used Jetta TDI so I could use biodiesel. I love it, and get
pretty good mileage - 42-45mpg. It was frustrating to know that
there were clean diesels in Europe, but not in the US. I couldn't
even purchase one in Europe, and bring it over here.

It's about time.
Reply to this comment
A diesel Honda? That gets 62.8 miles a gallon?
by udornthani2 August 1, 2007 8:34 PM PDT
The last line needs clarification. Yes, diesels are high compression and long stroke also slower revving and lower horsepower, but higher torque, capacity and engine refinements on a par compared to gasoline engines. They burn oil at high heat using the slow burn and long stroke to extract the energy from the oil.
The have lots of torque (long stroke and high compression), but (horse) power depends on the rate the energy is produced and in that category gasoline engines win hands down. What diesel produces nearly two horsepower per cubic inch which is now frequently seen in higher efficiency gas engines? And turbo-charging or supercharging gets you even more horsepower. A twin-turbo diesel might make the bottomor middle of the pack, but there's only one I know of and it's designed more like a gas engine.
Reply to this comment
Diesel Honda
by sallybranam August 1, 2007 8:57 PM PDT
In your article about the upcoming Honda, you made some comparisons to the Prius. You said that Priuses get 60 mpg in the city. They don't. They get between 40 and 45 mpg. I had one and took it back, because I was so disappointed. Toyota doesn't claim that the Prius gets 60 mpg; the EPA does. Toyota does play on this erroneous estimate though. There have been news and TV magazine programs about this discrepancy. In my humble opinion, there should be a class-action lawsuit.
Reply to this comment
nothing new
by flyingscot4 August 1, 2007 9:06 PM PDT
These Japanese diesels are only new to the US. Honda, Toyota, Mazda, Nissan, and almost every other manufacturer has diesels in Europe. Most taxi's are diesel and the Japanese products are very popular in that area. Why they are not available in the US is not a difficult question.
Reply to this comment
Diesel honda
by jswt August 2, 2007 12:23 PM PDT
OK. Big deal. Don't need diesel, don't need corn fed cars (which are a detriment to the ecology). Car manufacturers have had devices that extend mileage since 1956 on gasoline engine without the excess garbage that kills out environment.

Maybe you should expound on that.
Reply to this comment
by dhectorg December 10, 2009 2:08 PM PST
You are right that corn is about the dumbest thing to make fuels out of, however, there are numerous other plants, animal fats, and other byproducts (that we don't eat or need for any other purpose) that can be used to produce fuel with far fewer ill effects on the environment than gasoline. If you are suggesting that gasoline is the best that we can do, you are either being disingenuous, or are simply uninformed. It is my opinion that bio-diesel and fully electric cars are the only solutions to the "oil crisis" that we are in the midst of. Unfortunately, there are so many mouth pieces for the oil industry jabbering away online, that most people don't know fact from fiction.
Diesel Honda now were talking
by no rookie August 3, 2007 4:10 AM PDT
How can the foreign automakers adapt so quickly to the needs of the American situation. I remmeber volkswagon had a rabbitt boasting 54.5 mpg during the late 70's & 80's. These most adaptable versions offer relief and are workable. Remember the big three holding meetings, studying feasibility and market needs only to miss time their production entry with a inferior product. Let us revamp mgmt. The car makers are out of touch ,just as the politicians are with their target market.Fuel crunch & chrylser is building hot rods with hemi's gad zooks
Reply to this comment
volkswagon diesels
by no rookie August 3, 2007 4:21 AM PDT
A recent check I found vw mpg has slipped over the time to the late 30's to early 40's since then. At least thats what their brochures say.Hmmm Is this a means to regulate the flow and cost of a texan president manipulating oil prices & flow? What about hydrogen and electric cars that a working man can afford.
Diesel Honda
by moparlou August 17, 2007 10:56 AM PDT
After visiting Italy and seeing the beautifully styled cars that were equipped with diesel engines, it is amazing that this technology has not come to the US sooner. I was standing next to an Alfa Romeo 4 door sedan and didn't know it was a diesel. There was no tell-tale noise, smell or vibration.
Reply to this comment
Will it make it?
by Wood Heat January 12, 2008 3:59 PM PST
I sure hope so, but my thought is that if we can produce cars getting 20 mpg that means it will use three gallons of gas to go as far as one gallon in this diesel honda. That means less fuel tax - less money for the 'roads' Seems there is some government agency that does not want this.

I have a friend in R&D at Honda and he says Honda has the ability to get that mileage with gas as well.

I hope the auto industry comes of age like in Euorpe, but I have my serious doubts. Because they want all the fuel tax dollars possible.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (54 Comments)
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.