Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: Superthin MacBook in the works?

Rumors of MacBook Thin

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
My God, the cost!!
by Chris_Fon December 14, 2006 4:25 AM PST
Now as far as I can see, this will have a collosal price tag. With a similar spec to the MacBook Pro all altered using the secret Apple Shrink Ray, this will cost near enough to the Mac Pro.

One thing I am excited about is that the internals of the MacBook may be improved as a result. If Apple can effectively put a decent graphics card into a 12" laptop, MacBooks may evolve past the 64Mb GMA. (Personally, I would prefer buying the 13" MacBook when Leopard comes out. 12" is too small for my personal comfort)
Reply to this comment
Crossing my fingers, but not holding my breath
by wuki© December 14, 2006 5:15 AM PST
This would be great, i have been hesitant from buying a Macbook. With a 12" ultra thin, discrete graphics cards and matte screen you have me waiting in line already. I do agree, that it might be as expensive as the 15" Macbook Pro, or more even, but must ultra-portables do cost a pretty penny. If this happens i can finally retire my 12" PowerBook G4.
Reply to this comment
Describe Ultra-Thin?
by 214343675629293105719994635604 December 14, 2006 9:24 AM PST
As an Apple Owner of the original PowerBook G4, I thought I had a sleek, thin computer for what it can do. Then my roommate got the 15" MacBook Pro which is larger and thiner than mine. To me, his MacBook is ultra thin. How on earth can a 12" be any thinner? Either way, I'm sure I'll drool with glee upon its release.
Reply to this comment
Apple Utra-Thin vs Regular Ultra Thin
by Chris_Fon December 14, 2006 9:47 AM PST
I think Apple have set a 1 inch standard to all their laptops. So to Apple users 1 inch thickness is normal. To the rest of the world, Ultra-Thin suggests around 1 inch thickness.

The confusion occurs when Apple users read normal articles that use the words "ultra-thin". It begins the speculative processes in their minds of a laptop as thin as the iPod Nano!!
Not that it hasn't be done already . . .
by fleurya December 14, 2006 11:29 AM PST
but you have to go out of the US to get it. LG makes a very nice sub 1" laptop with optical drive that visually blows those plain-jane silver, black and white Macs out of the water. The LG even comes with a 14" screen, which I suppose puts it out of the ultraprotible category, but it's weight and slim design put it above those little 12"ers in my opinion.

Why do all of the other coutries get the best tech first!! (even Canada does for pete's sake!!
Reply to this comment
If it's true, I'll buy one-as will a dozen friends
by natejohnstone December 14, 2006 3:06 PM PST
The "hole" in the current Mac lineup is an small portable. I wouldn't
personally consider a 12" to be "ultraportable," but whatever you call it that
nitche is huge right now. Size and weight matters a lot to those who lug thier
computer around all the time. I love my 15" MacBook Pro, but on an airplane
it's uber-annoying because it doesn't fit on the tray!
If the 12" comes out this year, I know a lot of my friends who will get it, as
will my wife for sure. The current 13" Macbook dosen't have all the features
and is a bit chunky in my opinion. Currently, most of my collegues looking
for portability are opting for the new Sony 10.8" or whatever. An Apple
option would be nice!
Reply to this comment
But your forgetting
by Ram459 December 15, 2006 2:03 PM PST
The reason why i bought a mac and many others bought a mac was for the operating system. I don't ever want to have to deal with a micrsoft os again.
Reply to this comment
So oblivious
by Wild Eep December 17, 2006 9:47 AM PST
I have been wondering two things, one about these editors, and one about
Apple:

1: Do these editors ever read other rumor sites? The word has been out since
the 14th that the iPhone (which by the was won"t be the name, it's already
taken) will be announced this monday.

2: More importantly, does Apple ever read the rumor and fan sites? I so highly
doubt that. If Apple checked those sites, then we wouldn't be getting the
current garbage that is no different from the original stuff. When we ask
Apple for something, there should be a response.
Reply to this comment
And the iT
by Wild Eep December 17, 2006 9:47 AM PST
Reply to this comment
And the iTV...
by Wild Eep December 17, 2006 9:50 AM PST
Alright, this is just stupid, they announced their iTV type unit was announced
months ago. I don't beleive howuninformed the writer of this was.
Reply to this comment
6-8 hours my butt. good luck with an apple
by ferretboy88 December 17, 2006 3:51 PM PST
I have tons of apple products and i love them but not one of them gets any
where close to good battery time. My ipod only has about 2 hours and my
macbook 2.0 is only good for 2 hours and 45 minutes. If apple can get even 4
hours I would be happy.
Reply to this comment
not bad....
by thomusvoo December 17, 2006 8:40 PM PST
hopefully this is true. i need to get a new computer. a laptop is ideal of a student like me.
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

Most Popular

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.