Comments on: Apple breaks up Palm Pre-iTunes lovefest
With the release of iTunes 8.2.1, Apple puts a stop to the Palm Pre, iTunes synchronization.
With the release of iTunes 8.2.1, Apple puts a stop to the Palm Pre, iTunes synchronization.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
But, Apple has decided to cut off its nose to spite its face on this one.
I liked using iTunes to buy my music and then sync it with my Pre. It really seemed to me that Apple was getting the best of both worlds here, they weren't able to sell me an iPhone (because AT&T doesn't operate where I live) but they are still able to make money off of me.
I say, no more!
I'm boycotting Apple until they let us use their service again. I won't buy music or videos from the iTunes library. I won't buy iPods, laptops, desktops, servers or even headphones from the company until they understand that we really were happy enough to co-exist.
Hopefully this will show them that their squabbling with rivals doesn't help their bottom line, and it hurts the consumers.
I understand the arguments that "they don't have make a huge profit margin on music sales." But the truth is: profit is profit (that's probably even a Ferengi rule of acquisition or something). They are making some money, and some moneys is always better than no moneys.
While iTunes store is a significant part of Apple's whole picture.
Dealing with media companies is apparently not something Steve Jobs enjoys to do. As a matter of fact, it's getting increasingly difficult cause now due to iTMS's massive success all these content providers are really hostile against Apple fearing one day they will totally lose control over distribution terms.
Of course as consumers we shouldn't care about all that fuss, we pay our money, we deserve what we are supposed to get from it.
The thing is: you are never supposed to sync your Palm device with iTunes! Not according to Apple.
You bought the Pre either knowing Apple would most likely shut the loophole sometime soon or under the false pretense your phone is officially supported by iTunes, which, is not at all Apple's fault.
If you have a problem with Apple's deeply integrated business practice, boycott as long as you wish.
It's just technically, Apple just did what it have to do to protect its business model, nothing more than that.
Do I fully support this particular move? No, because as you stated, consumers did get burnt in the process. But did Apple do something wrong or illegal? I don't think so.
My iTMS related comment was just trying to state one fact: If you don't buy iDevice, Apple really don't need your nickels and dimes from the music purchase. 1, as you all ready understand, it's not very profitable actually. 2. The store almost become too big it stand in the way of Apple's product stratagy (if iTMS is half its size now, I believe the studios will be much less uptight regarding AppleTV content selection and service terms, which is the number 1 problem of AppleTV.)
From what I have read here , other tech sites and after some googling for information, and please correct me if i am wrong on this as I have no access to a Pre to know if its true, that Palms programmers (ex-apple ipod programmers) created a bit of code that when connected to itunes recieves itunes polling for a ID ipod/iphone serial number and ramdomly generates a fake number to spoof the program into thinking it is an older generation ipod and opening up all the sync capabilities itunes has to offer.
Forget about the fact that they ignored completely documented ways to do this already. What i would be more concerned with is how this effects security of information in iTunes.
Using their code could anyone with a Pre sync up to anyone elses itunes? I mean does it bypass other aspects of the security in iTunes, which i have read is limited anyways? Does it let you have access to any information that is not normally auto-sync'd with iTunes? Did it provide a base for those of less than legal intent to produce a plug in auto-breaker for getting a persons private information and finacial institution information or allow for the spoofing of content purchases onto someone elses account?
i do not know the answers to these questions myself and would very much like to hear even an explaination as to exactly how it was done and why none of my questions are possible using their work around.
All the Mac apologists say that iTunes was solely designed to work with Apple items. This unfortunately is not entirely accurate. If this were the case, it would not be a FREE download. If it were to be exclusively an Apple related item, the only way to get it would be to buy an Apple product, and quite possibly, it would be designed to only work on Apple computers and not windows machines.
Everyone knows iTunes is expressly designed to sync with iPods and iPhones. Any other device that forbids the rules of the EULA will be deactivated (in due time) from the sync feature. Users should understand this too, and even though a small few will gripe about this, the limitations are generally accepted.
If Palm wanted to create an experience for Pre users, then they should funnel the R+D together to create their own app, instead of portraying Apple as some bully locking them out (of THEIR OWN software..). And for those of you above that think this is anti-competitive or monopolistic, think again. When you first launched iTunes, you are presented with FAIR and just rules for using the software. No one is forcing you to agree with them or use iTunes; and if you accept the agreement, then you shouldn?t be in for a shock.
For those of you that think your iTunes purchased music can?t be synced with the Pre, think again. Simply (and painlessly) navigate to your My Music folder, go to iTunes, and drag-n-drop the content into the appropriate Pro-Pre application, to initiate the sync. Who knew your legally purchased media was so easy to find?
I wouldn't assume to offer advice to the tech-savvy group here, but...
Why not just load your media via USB? F**k the the middleman. Don't be so lazy.
Jusssayin'...
Anti trust? Monopoly? seriously? If you dont like iTunes or you just hate Apple, then dont download it. Seems simple enough to me
BTW, you do not buy things from iTunes - that is simply a media manager and front end for the ITunes Store.
As I said above, the fact that iTunes is free undercuts the argument that it is designed to enhance the iPod experience, etc. Again, if that were truly the case, iTunes would not be available as a free download, or you would get a warning everytime you booted the program that iTunes is not compatible with non-Apple products.
Are you telling this to me or to motlee2? If it was to me I wasn't assuming people won't buy from iTunes if they don't use an iPod or iPhone.
Undoubtedly some who are new to the smartphone market will consider the Pre's ability to work with itunes a bonus, but not the sole or even the main reason on which to base their decision. They will be trying each device before buying, I can guarantee that. And more often than not, the iphone, just by sheer word of mouth and the 'cool factor' will win by default. So IMO this latest move by Apple was just to make it harder for the competition at the expense of their user base (those for example who may have an ipod and Pre or just a Pre and want to keep itunes for music purchases). Yeah it might be seen as a shrewd business decision (based on self preservation)but it's in poor taste and was unnecessary. Will it hurt the the Pre? Hardly.
So, what new store is in your mind now? I know there's tons of stores out there. Or are you planning to buy your music from a music store that is not online?
http://reviews.cnet.com/4520-11297_7-6518467-2.html?tag=rb_content;rb_mtx
Oh, wait. There is. Try to guess if my money will go to Apple or to some one of the other guys. Come on, try to guess. And regarding Apple, it'll be a cold day in... someplace when/if I ever hand them any money -- for anything. Money talks, and bovine excrement walks.
What is iTunes ? Who is Apple ?
No one cares about making the consumers' life easier and more compatible, recognizing that people will purchase and use the devices that make their lives (their uniquely individual, unbranded lives) simpler. It's not like Apple is at risk of loosing their stronghold on mobile music. In the first quarter of 08 they posted a revenue of 9.6 billion. It's shame that their "My ball, go get your own!" intentions are so blatant. Way to be difficult. Sigh. Anyhoo, off to the store to pick up a macbook pro...
- by AppleSuxLeo July 18, 2009 6:10 PM PDT
- Warning...the Jew Jobs is kidney shopping someone said.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 4 of 5 pages (247 Comments)