Comments on: PS3's standby and off modes, (virtually) separated at birth
As useful as information found on the Internet can be, it can also be frustratingly myopic, resulting in moments when you have to take matters into your own hands.
As useful as information found on the Internet can be, it can also be frustratingly myopic, resulting in moments when you have to take matters into your own hands.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Don't buy these one-trick ponies--unless you like gizmos that gather dust.
The Net giant, ever eager for a faster Internet, debuts its Google Public DNS service. With it, Google could become even more central to the Net.
switching off a big CRT TV set rather than leaving it on standby 24/7 was a no-brainer; switching off our computerized devices that draw significant power just to BOOT is a new issue, makes things much less obvious.
I'm still kind of amazed the article focuses so much on "Do I have to switch off my PS3?"; maybe some will argue with that, but the implicit conclusion is, in my eyes: "I proved scientifically it doesn't save a significant amount of energy to turn off my PS3 when I'm not using it - so, everybody go ahead, leave all your electronics on all the time!"
And I certainly have my doubts about the PS3's carbon footprint applying to any electronic device.
This calls for more testing - and suggests a nice idea: the information on wether a given device is worth switching off to save energy (and not just MONEY) should definitely be available to the customer!
Still, great article, as it gets us all to debate - and I'm certainly no stranger to the laziness factor ;-)
- by icecold638 July 8, 2009 5:39 AM PDT
- Does leaving it on standby mode damage it in the long run in any way?
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (42 Comments)