Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: Blu-ray player sales on the rise, report says

According to The NPD Group, first-quarter 2009 sales of stand-alone Blu-ray players (read: not including the PS3) in the U.S. surpassed 400,000 units, an increase of 72 percent over Q1 2008.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by crescentdave May 6, 2009 4:25 PM PDT
Evidently the "bag-o-hurt" isn't going away ...
Reply to this comment
by Synthmeister May 7, 2009 8:03 AM PDT
Steve Jobs "bag-o-hurt" was the onerous licensing fees and process involved with BR not the tech itself. Supposedly that process will be streamlined and cheaper by this summer.

Personally, I think the tipping point will happen by Christmas 2009 with sub $150 BR players, and sub $1000 1080p HDTVs already in places like Walmart and Costco. People will simply rent BR movies until the prices come down, just like we did with DVDs.
by lewac May 6, 2009 5:54 PM PDT
well my problem is this.. the cost of a blank that cost 30X more than a dual-layer DVD! for 3X or so more data space. that does not equate in my book. also take a look at the price of burners. yeah its gonna be awhile and well before that time guess what happens? yeah memory sticks and SSD's are gonna be moving in on "spinner" turf in a very BIG way. so don't waste breath with blue-ray by the time one spends all those bucks the memory stick will blow ALL spinning discs away. DVD, dual DVD, blue-ray... good-bye forever. HDD and scuzzy are going the same way... five years hence they'll all be a part of history. and guess what... all this stuff that is being replaced? with re-writable stuff.
Reply to this comment
by DJOmega6 May 6, 2009 6:51 PM PDT
It's hard to take you seriously when you add an 'e' to blu-ray. That and your lack of capitalization at the beginning of sentences.
by CFSacks May 6, 2009 6:57 PM PDT
Most people want to have a permanent record of thier favorite movie. A 25 or 50 gigabyte memory stick will not likely be cheap ever. Not really caring about burnable blu-ray. Just want to see my favorite high def movie when I want to. Also, downloading 25 or 50 gigabyte files will never be cheap either when ISPs start charging by the gigabyte. Some might be motivated to pirate blu-ray disks which is why they are concerned about burners. I wouldn't mind reasonably priced blu-ray burners/media for the ability to store large amounts of legal stuff like my photos or such. Copying DVD's or Blu-ray's of course is illegal. Just some thoughts.
by deanbvfx May 7, 2009 5:55 AM PDT
a dual layer DVD-R can set you back 45p
Where as a 8GB(9GB ain't made) flash drive will set you back £11 at the cheapest.
BD-R is £3.50 for 25GB version, cheapest 32GB(once again no exact size comparison) is £45.
Blu-Ray is more £ per GB than DVD, but compared to flash memory both are stupidly cheap. And that is how it will always be.
And I have a stash of 1p CD's with a crap load of stuff backed up. Im not gonna just get a ton of Flash drives for archiving stuff.
by zombie20012 December 7, 2009 9:46 PM PST
Yeah, I agree. I watch most of my movies on burns and blank dvd's are just very affordable. I have a few BluRays and I guess they are a little bit clearer but I just don't think the small difference is worth waisting that much money on and high quality DIVX files and DVD quality is more than acceptable. Anyway, wait till the holographic discs come out. Maybe with 500gb media and much more processing power, they can reproduce a more natural filmlike format that all the disc mediums seem to be lacking up to this point.
by nicmart May 6, 2009 6:41 PM PDT
The "content providers," which is to say the movie studios, are, as usual, acting the fool. The cost of Blu-Ray movies is absurdly high, so I, like many, have shiny players that are barely used. The number of disks on sale at Costco and Sam's Club/Wal-Mart has thinned during the year. I would have expected at least Warner, which pioneered lower-cost DVD movies, to be more aggressive in the pricing of Blu-Ray titles, but they are shooting themselves, and consumers, in the foot. Bewilderingly, the studios prefer a format -- DVD -- which is easily copied by anyone with a PC.
Reply to this comment
by DJOmega6 May 6, 2009 6:48 PM PDT
Actually, Warner has been very aggressive price wise with their back catalog. Movies like The Departed, 2001, and Clockwork Orange are often on sale on Amazon or Best Buy for $15-$20. As for newer releases, I expect the prices to come down just in time for Christmas.
by planblove May 7, 2009 7:24 AM PDT
True, dude stop looking in stores and buy them online. A LOT of good deals online on the top tier movies and older titles.
by zombie20012 December 7, 2009 10:03 PM PST
Quit kidding yourself, if you are buying older films, even the 20 or so bargain BluRays you find at Target or BestBuy are just so much more expensive than the 100's of films you can find at WalMart for $3.00 (There Will Be Blood for example) and $5.00. Unless you have a lot of money and enjoy blowing that money on the movies you think are so wonderful, then you are really gonna kick yourself someday when you look at that stack of cheap plastic bluray cases that even placed in the most elegant of bookcases is still just a collection of movies that are only gonna take you as far as your couch.
by CFSacks May 6, 2009 6:59 PM PDT
I got my Sony Blu-ray player at BJ's just after "Black Friday" for $190. Same unit now costs $280! What gives? Hope the prices do come down for others. I wouldn't have payed much more than I did.
Reply to this comment
by deanbvfx May 7, 2009 6:01 AM PDT
I don't tend to by many DVDs any way, but since I got my PS3 I've not really bothered with getting DVD's when £2 extra will get you a Blu-Ray version.
It was pretty good last year with Iron Man and Dark Knight on Blu-Ray, and this year has Watchmen, Star Trek, the raft of '3D' films.
I think one of the turn off seems to be that people think they need to re-buy their film library like they did with VHS->DVD. If BDA get some ad's out showing that Blu-Ray no only plays DVDs but upscale them to HD too then it would clear up some of the confusion around the tech.
Reply to this comment
by Don Key May 7, 2009 9:49 AM PDT
I think this has more to do with people replacing broken DVD players with Blu-ray players because they are so cheap now. They know they will need one in the future and it plays DVD's so why not?

I have a Blu-ray in my PS3 but never use it. Doesn't really grab me much and I'm on a 42 inch HDTV. Not a fan of the hiked up prices from new Blu-rays and rentals.
Reply to this comment
by anothadave May 7, 2009 3:37 PM PDT
you can get bluray films for £8 online no trouble now. amazon and play.com are always doing 3 for 2 deals or 2 for £18 or similar. so complaints about prices are just old news! ive not bought a dvd in nearly 18months. with a little searching the same film can be bought on bluray for roughly the same price but with the far superior picture and sound quality. remember its not just the physical disk price that raises the cost of the bluray film, the content is of much higher quality than dvd so requires more work in transfering it to the disk and quite often requires restoration of the film stock and remixing the audio too. i remember when dvds first came out and they where nearly £20 for a new movie, £200 for a dvd burner and a fiver a piece for a dvdr. how short peoples memories are...
Reply to this comment
(15 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.