Comments on: In defense of Sprint and the Palm Pre
An internal AT&T document attacks the Palm Pre for being inferior to the Apple iPhone, but CNET editor Bonnie Cha defends the Pre--and Sprint.
An internal AT&T document attacks the Palm Pre for being inferior to the Apple iPhone, but CNET editor Bonnie Cha defends the Pre--and Sprint.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Many friends of mine that work FOR AT&T have admitted that they receive special sim cards that enable their phone signal/service to be better than the average customer that walks in and DOESN'T work for AT&T.
Not only that, AT&T has their b*ll**** claim of having the "fewest dropped calls." That is the biggest load of DOODOO I have ever seen whenever I see those commercials. How are they even allowed to make those ridiculous claims?!?! I can make a phone call on one side of my bed, roll to the opposite side and the person on the other line cannot hear a word I am saying. Yet, when I call to complain about losing service in my own home, they have the nerve to tell me that I have "4 towers" by my house. Oh really? Can they explain to me why I lose service when I move my body 180 degrees? AT&T has the worst customer service.
Yes, I am using this article to vent my anger with AT&T because I am extremely unsatisfied with AT&T. Moreover, how EXCITED I am to be switching to Spring at the end of next month!
THANK YOU FOR FINALLY CALLING AT&T OUT BONNIE!! It's about time someone did :o)
http://www.intomobile.com/2008/07/14/iphone-3g-isnt-plastic-zirconia-ceramic-casing.html
I'ld rather go with Metro pcs or BOOST mobile for around $50 a month and no contract than go with rip off sprint...
http://compare.helio.com/
While the Pre/iPhone chart points out a few good points of difference, the verbiage that really implies failure on the Pre's part just kind of make me shrug my shoulders and go, "Meh." It was the same way with the Ocean/iPhone comparison. But I guess every company's got to train the troops any way they can to up against something perceived to be a threat, even if it means teaching them to parrot strange half-truths and below-the-belt punches.
Funny thing to me is, though, that all the other networks - AT&T included - are going to get some sort of iteration of the Pre if Palm launches it successfully with Sprint first. Seriously - wait and see what happens if the Pre launches successfully. You'll be walking into an AT&T store some day and there will be a shiny new WebOS phone sitting next there next to the iPhone and the salesperson won't care which one you buy.
Palm really broke new ground with the U.I. The iPhone looks like sometning ported over from a home computer...oh yea , that is what Apple did. That is why the iPhone`s memory footprint is too large to multi-task.
A fresh new OS designed for a small handheld device is just what Palm has delivered. And exceeded the iPhone. Also the apps for the Palm Pre will be sold by many vendors...none of that Apple walled-garden crap here. Also a Palm OS emulator has already been released. Look at the % increase in "S" and "PALM" in the last few months and what the analysts are saying. Palm is the future.
TY PALM !
You have your hip wanna-bes vs. think for yourself intelligent people.
It's good for the economy.
I'm also a bit confused about the 'way too expensive' plans talk. At the moment, if I was impatient and sprung for the iPhone now instead of waiting to see what comes out this summer, I'd be spending $89.99 a month. With Sprint, getting the same features would cost me $69.99. Is $20 seriously that big a deal to some people? I mean, yes, it adds up over time, but in the grand scheme of things it's inconsequential as far as I'm concerned.
Apple has changed the game, it's no longer the phone, IT'S THE APPS!!!
(I really hope somebody influential at these companies reads and understands this, because I don't want to be succumbed into buying an Iphone as well.)
I called Sprint to inquire about canceling my account and transferring over to AT&T. Their response? "We see you've been a valued customer for 7 years...we understand why you might be interested in trying out another carrier...Here's what we can do for you..."
They DROPPED the $15/month fee for unlimited DATA, gave me 500 free text messages, AND offered to substitute the mail-in rebate for an upgrade with an instant rebate.
To say that I was overwhelmed by this offer is an understatement...Basically, I'm getting the same kind of service that it would cost me almost $90 (before taxes and fees) per month on AT&T for $39.99 (taxes and fees) on Sprint.
Simply put...I want an iPhone, but not enough to warrant spending TWICE the amount of money on my plan each month. I was incredibly excited about the release of the Palm Pre. I'm convinced that the future of both Palm and Sprint depend on the success of this phone. I agree with many people that Sprint does not offer the kind of "head turning" hardware that people covet. But the truth is...Sprint is cheaper...by at least $20 a month in many cases, and I would argue that Sprint has the best 3G network of all of the major carriers. IF they don't have the best 3G network, I would definitely argue that the other networks aren't 25% better...
I think Palm is banking on this phone to save their company. I'll be there on day 1 to support it. Unless it costs like $400...if that's the case, then Palm and Sprint deserve to fail. But I don't think that'll be the case.
I have a iPhone 3g, and simple stuff such as bluetooth doesn't work on any device I've tried, AT&T doesn't want to help, telling me to contact apple... who sends me back to AT&T. Dropped calls, "Call Failed" is a constant issue, running the latest software/firmware as of 4/09... just want to dump the phone, but AT&T says I can't for one year. (Oh... and my SIM card is stuck in the unit, and nobody has been able to remove it (AT&T, Apple Genius Bar). The stuck SIM card is what keeps me from dumping the phone on ebay.
Why, oh why does AT&T not have any protection contracts available? The only thing I can think of is they know the phone is such a trouble-prone device that they couldn't find a company to underwrite the policy.
- by enough2bdangerous April 30, 2009 8:25 AM PDT
- First of all I would love an IPHONE but will buy a PRE because of the network and the rates. I am a MAC user and this is the reason that the IPHONE will still be around. It integrates with a Mac seamlessly. Sprint called the Instinct an iphone killer. Nothings going to kill the iphone. Look at the ipod and its market share. Palm has been the only other company to come close to integrating with a Mac. Moving everything to the web is brilliant. I use to have .mac account and now I have a gmail account, didn't enjoy paying for email. Anyone who integrates all of our favorite web aps is going to win. I think the Pre will effect the sales to people who don't want ATT and don't have a mac. It gives them another option. It will probably change the way other manufacturers build phones going forward. No more windows mobile yuck.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 4 of 4 pages (129 Comments)