Comments on: The new TV remote: Your bare hand?
At least one major TV manufacturer has been actively looking at how to bring a TV into the mainstream that is controlled by motion sensor.
At least one major TV manufacturer has been actively looking at how to bring a TV into the mainstream that is controlled by motion sensor.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
"No I didn't I was just trying to change the channel"
Apart from a good excuse for kids to argue and the frustration it will cause as the quality of it degenerates over time. I don't think these things will ever take off until we get to the 'creepy' stage where technology tracks our every move and can work out what we are doing/saying.
You don't want the TV changing channel as you wave good by to someone or reach for something on the table. I guess a combination of voice recognition and had gestures might work better as it would provide less false positive results if you had to say "Volume up" while making a gesture.
The purpose of the remote control device was to eliminate the need to "get up" every time we wanted to change stations or start a movie. Seems like they're taking a few steps back.
"The variety of information and programming on television is certainly stretching the limits of the four-way control pad, so manufacturers are...seeing a lot of complexity start to creep in," and they're going to solve this by waving your hands around?
Read the comments. Nobody wants a gesture remotless TV.
My Harmony remote controls all my devices, and all I have to do is tell it what I want. It sets everything up for me. I'm not interested is gesturing. What a lame idea.
Now, if they wanted to really do something useful, they'd work more on the accuracy of voice recognition so you could just tell your TV what to do "Television Volume Up". or "Television channel scan", or some such verbal commands would kick a$$ over a gesture system.
When Logitech comes out with a new Harmony that will use voice recognition, that's definately something I will check into.
In either case, I don\t think these manufacturers should completely abandon the IR remote on their gesture TVs. They might find very few people purchasing them, and a lot of returns from people who discover just how lame gesturing is for a remote system.
Some form of RF should be the new standard.
they said a camera senses your movements and gestures from far.
The other thing that would be great is ditching IR. Please use something that doesn't require line-of-sight. RF seems like the best compromise.
Then I wouldn't lose a remote 'cause there'd only be one to keep track of.
human: "Voice command on."
TV: "Voice command activated"
human: "Channel 202 on"
TV: "Channel 202 now selected"
This is well within current technology.
http://www.bluetomorrow.com/content/section/230/342/
It's Superbowl Sunday, the ball's on the 1 yard line, hut 1, hut 2, hut 3.. THERE'S A FUMBLE...!!! Everyone in the room throw their arms up in excitement....!!!!! At which point we now find ourselves watching Bible study.. Everyone now is up on their feet screaming and waving their arms in anger as the television now starts flying through more channels as the sound goes up and down, contrast ever changing and menus flashing before our eyes...!!!
Like I said.... doomed to failure
This idea is great for presentations. I am not sure about the TV.. yet..
Now, if I can go to channel 53 by showing five fingers on my left hand and 3 on the right... that's another story :-)
- by jog4444 April 11, 2009 11:04 AM PDT
- This is a really great idea.. but what if you have more then one person in the same room.. that could b a problem.. They should make it so it recongizes a certain color and the person who controls it would have that color on him/or her somehow or someway
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(27 Comments)