Comments on: No update for you naughty Twitterers, Apple says
Apple reportedly rejects update of popular Twitter client for iPhone and iPod Touch due to an offensive word found in Twitter's Trends.
Apple reportedly rejects update of popular Twitter client for iPhone and iPod Touch due to an offensive word found in Twitter's Trends.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Jay
Corporations always have our best intrest at heart? don't they....For you who may find non alphanumeric writing intelligable, tough... I may spell it wrong, but I will spell it out. so FUQ
M$ doesn't have customers, they have slaves.
I smell CORPORATE LAPDOG>>>>CBS ANYONE? NO TAkers?
Double standards, anyone?
I note that there are times when postings here on CNET contain some of the content that Apple will not allow in apps in the Apps Store. However, they still advertise on CNET. Again, what sort of double standards apply?
I wonder if Apple should also drop Safari from the iPhone because it accesses the Internet and.. *gasp* there is naughty words and pictures there too.
Censorship is so easy to get started. What's next, Apple? Book burnings?
I've finished ranting. I'll F off now.
Self-censoring, Is far worse than What we've come to expect from UberCorpses like apple and Miscrosoft and every other so-called dissimenators of information...Ill Say FGUCK YOU< SUCK MY ASS PIS UP A TOUPEE and If I'm banned by the InterPOl Net Cops, I'll Go Back to using( GASP< BY THE COLLECTIVE DIrt-Merchants) Paper Pamphlets, Like the Guy's that actually had to die for the right to say whatever the **** they wanted too...Papers pretty easy to make, Steall the wood from McMansion Construction sites, and gring it into a fine sawdust, or saw down you ******* neighbors lawn furniture...
So called CREATIVE(NOT REALLY, more sophmoric) and this comes from a guy who never Gradiated frum a colidgerator-Misspling is just a **** ants way around, an obtuse use of the cabesa and cabbooseJUST SAY WHAT YOU WANT.. For CHrists sake...
That was fast. I think it got the point. :)
Oh well. The updated did in fact push so this article should be updated.
- by dvorkian March 18, 2009 3:05 AM PDT
- /*Part I: Comments on the article */
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 2 pages (63 Comments)Within 2 hours the article was updated with a comment from the developer of the application, giving Apple the benefit of the doubt:
"At the same time," the developer added, "this could have
been just a goof on Apple's part. The App Store is still
very young, they're working out the kinks."
Within 24 hours of the initial date on this article Twitter 1.3 was published. I find it unlikely that Apple will ever respond to Dong Ngo's e-mail requesting a comment, but surely he knows that the update has been released through official channels. Why was the article never updated a second time?
/*Part II: Comments on the comments */
People who state that they will never purchase an Apple product because of things like this are over reacting.
/*Part III: Niggling comments on the writing */
It's more like mom withholding dessert because you *heard* a bad word.
Apple does not comment on the approval process for App Store or iTunes Store applications. The first requirement in the approval process for Apple applications is that they be written at Apple (or a company which has been purchased by Apple.)
As far as I can tell there was never a "Twitter 1.3" on the iTunes Store.