Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: Alleged spy photos reveal USB-laden Mac Mini

Apple Insider has posted some alleged spy photos of the backside of what might be the next-gen Mac Mini. Connections include a whopping five USB ports. But are the photos fakes?

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (78 Comments)
by Mr. Dee February 19, 2009 2:45 PM PST
You can comparable PC's for way cheaper, with more RAM, faster processor, keyboard, mouse and a Flat Panel like the Dell Studio. Vista does everything you need too, comes with build apps for email, photos, movies, collaboration and you can get updated versions for (FREE) Windows Live Essentials.
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor February 19, 2009 2:52 PM PST
Mr Dee, what does this have to do with anything? This wasn't a review or someone trumpeting the Mac Mini. It was a rumor about a rumored product. Leave your Mac Mini bashing out of it please.

On another note, I agree that the Mini is underpowered and overpriced. It was made to fill a perceived need and it worked because the people wanted something they shouldn't have wanted. (shrugs) It's not Apple fault in my opinion, but I would never purchase one.
by Pishkado February 19, 2009 3:18 PM PST
You can get a Kia with comparable specs for a lot less money than a BMW 1 Series too, but that doesn't mean people in a position to make that choice would want to get one.

As for Vista doing everything you want - in the same sense that a 1953 Chevy did everything I want in a car. It just didn't do it, by today's standards, very well - but if you go down a checklist with "Goes forward? Yes. Goes in reverse? Yes. Stops? Yes. Has headlights? yes" you'll find it has all the boxes checked.
by kcotham February 19, 2009 3:38 PM PST
Uh yes, and they won't run Mac OS X, nor are they in such a small form factor. And if it's a Dell, you can count on it breaking in 6 months. Keep your Micro$oft rhetoric in you own head please.
by kylebuttermore February 19, 2009 3:53 PM PST
typical mac users, have to lie to themselves because they wasted their money...
by liozzi February 19, 2009 4:07 PM PST
It seems the Apple Fanboys are the ones doing the bashing here. I have a Dell that I use daily that I bought in the first quarter of 2002. I haven't had any problems with it, so the comment "if it's a Dell, you can count on it breaking in 6 months" is truth functionally invalid.

No it won't run Mac OS. That's because Apple doesn't want people to buy a computer from anyone but them. Both Macs and PCs will run Windows and Linux so logically the compatibility issue is Apples, not Microsoft's. Have you noticed that most open source software runs on Linux and Windows? Mac OS is anti-open source. Apple is pro-DRM, and makes everything as proprietary as they can.

If you want to impress people with your ability to buy a product, buy a Mac/iPod/iPhone. If you really don't like big corporations like Microsoft, build your own PC, or pay some one to do so, and run Linux. Of course you fanboys can continue to worship at the Church of Mac while providing Apple with funds to suppress innovation and destroy the environment. Follow or lead, it's your choice.
by Penguinisto February 19, 2009 4:31 PM PST
Wow - the fact that you folks are screaming and howling at each other over what is most likely a photoshop hoax is pretty hilarious, to say the least...

Can you campers at least wait until the thing comes out before making your (obviously uninformed) pronouncements on it?

Thx in advance...
by Nataku4ca February 19, 2009 5:59 PM PST
o yes this is a sad ms vs mac thread

just remember, there is a version of linux that looks and feels like mac, unless u want to actually run mac apps thats a different story (wonder if there is vm that allows actual mac to run on pc?)
by make_or_break February 19, 2009 10:16 PM PST
"You can get a Kia with comparable specs for a lot less money than a BMW 1 Series too..."

BMW must be really MAD at you for your nerve in making this comparison.
by canberra_photographer February 19, 2009 10:52 PM PST
Mr Dee should really be called Me Deeluded. Apples have longer life cycles and come with the iLif creative suite, Mail and Safari. Vista comes with mine sweeper and picture gallery, oh and Internet Explorer and Mail.
by kelmon February 20, 2009 2:30 AM PST
This is all very exciting. Has it occurred that some people simply don't like Windows? Let people make their own decisions based on what they like and respect that.
See more comment replies
by myles taylor February 19, 2009 2:49 PM PST
I think it's photoshopped. It's completely outside of Apple character to put that many USB ports on anything. Even the Mac Pro only has 5 ports. And why two Display ports? It just doesn't make any sense. I wouldn't be surprised to see Apple cut the Firewire ports out of the Mini entirely, like they did the Macbook, but I guess it's not too much of a stretch to see an 800 port there.

My vote is that it's fake.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease February 19, 2009 3:17 PM PST
I agree, looks like a PhotoShop.

A "spy shot" with what looks like a parquet floor background, could be a desk or table top though. Did they take a shot of the label plate? If you have enough time to get a photo of the back you probably have time for other views.
by kcotham February 19, 2009 3:42 PM PST
It's probably a fake, but a comment on FireWire. FireWire is a much better standard, in practice than USB is, in practice. Offloading calls to hardware as in FireWire makes more sense than having the CPU handle them, as in USB. Besides, FireWire 800 is a screamer compared to USB 2.0. And when comparing real world transfer rates between FireWire 400 and USB 2.0, Firewire still is faster. I can definitely see them dropping FireWire 400 and keeping USB 2.0 though.
by Penguinisto February 19, 2009 4:33 PM PST
Count up my vote in the "fake" column.

OTOH, it's pretty entertaining to watch the flame-fests elsewhere in the comments over something that most likely doesn't exist... so much angst, so little knowledge.
by Nataku4ca February 19, 2009 6:03 PM PST
dont forget usb3 is coming and thats a much faster standard than 2

not saying firewire is bad, but most of my(actually all of my...) stuff runs on usb not to mention all cell phones are going to be run on usb anyways
by kelmon February 20, 2009 2:36 AM PST
@kcotham

I totally agree that Firewire is better than USB but given that Apple dropped it from the MacBooks, which are pretty much directed at the same sort of market as a Mac Mini, there is a precedent here for them doing the same with the Mini. I hope that this is not the case but I wouldn't be surprised to see it happen.

@Nataku4ca

I certainly hope that you're not saying that Firewire is bad. It is a considerable shame that it lost out to USB and I have to confess to being highly skeptical about USB 3 given the realities of USB 2. In the meantime I will always buy Firewire when the option is available.
by daedbird February 19, 2009 2:50 PM PST
Nope, I don't seem to buy them....There is something not quite right about the mini DVI port. The grey surround looks thicker than the other ports, and the port itself does not look right to me
Reply to this comment
by gadjitfreek February 19, 2009 2:54 PM PST
Actually, I have been using the Mac Mini as the cornerstone of my home studio since 2005, and it's about time for a refresh.
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor February 19, 2009 3:10 PM PST
I don't disagree with you there (and I don't think anyone would) but the question is whether this is real or not.
by daedbird February 19, 2009 3:02 PM PST
I plan on getting a next gen Mac Mini to be the hub of my home theater as well....small, can stream anything online to my TV then, , can replace a DVD player, control my audio tracks from my office. I plan on adding an EyeTV for DVR functionality......and I'll be set
Reply to this comment
by thebendds February 19, 2009 3:14 PM PST
The fact that there is no HDMI shouldn't be a surprise. No Mac has ever had HDMI. Until Apple decides that they want to be in the Home Media Server market, they are not going to add features to a product that would make consumers think that this is what this device is for.
Reply to this comment
by mwsmith824 February 19, 2009 3:17 PM PST
They're already in that market, it's the AppleTV. Though I doubt they'd risk cannibalizing those sales to put HDMI on the Mini.
by applusr February 19, 2009 3:32 PM PST
AppleTV is a hobby product for them, Mini is part of there line up.
by thebendds February 19, 2009 4:25 PM PST
The AppleTV, as it is today, is more of a media player than a server. Unless you are going to get your content exclusively through iTunes, it's not going to be the go-to device for digital media. You still need a computer for that. Apple realizes this and prices the AppleTV at less than half of what a Mini costs.
by markredf150 February 19, 2009 8:22 PM PST
thebendds, there is a rumor going around that Apple may be developing a technology that either on Apple TV or iTunes, you can stream content that you purchased that isn't physically on the hard drive, therefore making it somewhat of a server. so don't count out the Apple TV as a server just yet. yes, Apple made the ATV better than the first iteration, but this puppy still has a lot of potential
by kelmon February 20, 2009 2:38 AM PST
Correct - Apple seems to be having almost nothing to do with HDMI but rather is betting on DisplayPort to be the correct solution. The more important question here is whether the DisplayPort on the Mini will provide audio.
by erictbar February 19, 2009 3:26 PM PST
Not sure if it's real or not but the port numbers and types do correspond with previous rumors.
Reply to this comment
by rnaoncfixd February 19, 2009 3:29 PM PST
Perhaps they're planning on making a Mini Display to HDMI sometime in the future and that's why they didn't include it? Also, I think it would be cool if they just made this unibody aluminum as well; no white top, just entirely encased in aluminum.
Reply to this comment
by kelmon February 20, 2009 2:39 AM PST
This adaptor is being made by 3rd parties, although I would hope that Apple makes their own version at some point as well.
by Perry_Clease February 19, 2009 3:31 PM PST
Take a look at the shadow on the left side? Something doesn't seem quite right about that, I think that it should be larger, should be the same width as the Mini. Lighting overall doesn't seem to match up.

Any military photo intel analysts here who can give us an expert opinion?
Reply to this comment
by myles taylor February 19, 2009 6:07 PM PST
The light hitting it at an angle could create that shadow. I still think it's fake, but the shadow checks out.
by Perry_Clease February 19, 2009 6:17 PM PST
"The light hitting it at an angle could create that shadow. I still think it's fake, but the shadow checks out."

I took a similar shaped object, a NewerTech Hard Drive, and checked it out. I couldn't recreate the shadow, no matter how I oriented it. That doesn't mean that I had the light source correct, but I still think that the shadow width should match the thickness of the Mini.
by make_or_break February 19, 2009 10:21 PM PST
I say you could replicate the shadows...use a cell phone camera with a really wimpy built-in flash.
by Perry_Clease February 20, 2009 4:53 AM PST
"I say you could replicate the shadows...use a cell phone camera with a really wimpy built-in flash."

You may be right about the wimpy cell phone camera, that photo is one step up from a connivence store security camera. However, the shadow shows light coming from the upper right as does the glare on the table surface.

Whatever, the image is probably fake, or has been altered.
by ewelch February 19, 2009 3:38 PM PST
HDMI is irrelevant. It's can't hold a candle to display port for bandwidth. You can daisy chain monitors with Display Port.

HDMI is also crippled with DRM. Watching movies on a computer's screen may be important to a few people, but Apple has the right idea with Apple TV.

The Mac Mini can also work with the right cables as a media server. And way cheaper than PCs that are media servers. Mr. Dee doesn't know what he's talking about. He's just an Apple hater.
Reply to this comment
by liozzi February 19, 2009 4:21 PM PST
It's funny to see Apple fanboys say a product is crippled because it has DRM.

Appple wants to send people to jail for "jail-breaking" their iPhone.

iTunes is crippled with DRM so it must be irrelevant.

A ten year old PC (or Mac for that matter) can also work as a media server.

There's a lot of people commenting here who don't know what they're talking about. They're just PC haters.
by random truth February 19, 2009 5:14 PM PST
iTunes now is drmless. I would also like to point out that displayport has drm too. Its called HDCP
by kelmon February 20, 2009 2:44 AM PST
Disagree. HDMI Is quite clearly not irrelevant for the simple reason that all TVs and most monitors now shipping provide an HDMI connection whereas there is very little support for DisplayPort. I agree that DisplayPort is the "better" standard but the fact of the matter is that there are few devices that support it so describing HDMI as "irrelevant" is rather daft. Betamax was superior to VHS but look what happened there...
by CrashPad63 February 20, 2009 11:07 AM PST
Itunes still has DRM, they just offer to "upgrade" your old files to non DRM for a fee, and all Non DRM future downloads will be for a premium over the regular DRM'd music.
Funny thing a certain software company had developed, perfected and deployed a entertainment room box for media steaming. Some 8 years previous to Apple. Microsoft. Now Xbox , Media Center PC and Meida Extender all are available and are much more pervasive than Apple TV.
by random truth February 20, 2009 4:00 PM PST
@crashpad, wrong.
You old tracks you can upgrade to itunes plus for 0.30 cents a track. All new tracks downloaded from iTunes are in 256 kbit/sec aac files. Their is a new pricing system that has not been implemented yet where tracks will cost $0.69, $0.99, and $1.29 depending on their popularity. Have you seriously not used itunes in the last 2 months?
by kcotham February 19, 2009 3:45 PM PST
Look at the edge above the vents, right in line above the Cat 5 port. It looks like a clear demarcation line between the photo noise on the left and right. Clearly photo shopped. A good job, but not quite good enough.
Reply to this comment
by February 19, 2009 3:53 PM PST
The key to this product is not the number of ports but the size of the hard disk. This needs to have at least a terabyte option.
Reply to this comment
by kelmon February 20, 2009 2:46 AM PST
While I agree that the option of a terabyte capacity hard drive would be nice, it won't happen (2.5" drives top out at 500GB at the moment, I believe) and I also doubt that this is a necessity. I mean, there's a boatload of ports at the back that you can connect to external storage so people can add if they need more.
by kelmon February 20, 2009 2:46 AM PST
While I agree that the option of a terabyte capacity hard drive would be nice, it won't happen (2.5" drives top out at 500GB at the moment, I believe) and I also doubt that this is a necessity. I mean, there's a boatload of ports at the back that you can connect to external storage so people can add if they need more.
by Perry_Clease February 19, 2009 4:59 PM PST
"There's a lot of people commenting here who don't know what they're talking about. They're just PC haters."

Which posts?
Reply to this comment
by wiredchicken February 19, 2009 5:06 PM PST
How do you fit cds into this thing??? They are just like dominos pizza, every single mac mini or notebook looks the same (uniformed). It's like something that would be distributed in the communistic country of china (usa?).
Reply to this comment
by nickh2 February 19, 2009 7:06 PM PST
"How do you fit cds into this thing?"

It has a slot on the front.

"t's like something that would be distributed in the communistic country of china "

You are confusing "utilitarian" with "sleek and elegant". Not the same thing.
by Esquirrel February 19, 2009 6:37 PM PST
If Steve Jobs dies, who will unveil it to the public? No one. It will forever remain a secret Apple product.
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease February 19, 2009 6:48 PM PST
When Steve passes away Apple will probably use the Oxyclean guy as their spokesman.

"BILL MAYS HERE WITH THE NEW APPLE MINI, IT SLICES, IT DICES, IT MAKES JULIENNE FRIES. IT WON'T RUST, BUST OR COLLECT DUST."
by wnbear February 20, 2009 6:25 AM PST
@Perry_Clease

Nope...the ShamWow guy is clearly a better choice.
by Seaspray0 February 20, 2009 12:26 PM PST
Ron Popiel has the experience, and if you order now he'll throw in a set of ginsu knives.
by Shaun822 February 19, 2009 6:58 PM PST
I'd like to see a new Mac Mini but I'm not sold on this picture.
Reply to this comment
by gary85739 February 19, 2009 7:43 PM PST
is Apple really going out of business?
Reply to this comment
by Perry_Clease February 19, 2009 8:19 PM PST
For about 20 years now, just listen to the pundits.
by ansellundberg February 19, 2009 10:42 PM PST
If you look above the "5" USB ports, there is only one USB symbol. I am looking on the back of my 2008 iMac right now, and there is a symbol above each port. Something's fishy... But now that I look at the current Mac Mini, there is only one symbol there, too. Notwithstanding, the number of ports is outrageous.
Reply to this comment
by jscott418 February 20, 2009 2:17 AM PST
For the price the Mac Mini has always been a poor choice. Small hard drive and limited video and USB ports. Unless you really need the small size its not a good choice. This would go a long way to improve the Mini if they can back it up with a big HD. If the price goes up its going to be a dud.
Reply to this comment
by AppleSuxLeo February 22, 2009 7:46 PM PST
But they give Steve Snobs a fat wallet. That is the point of ANY Apple product. Less performance , higher price , inability to play most games. Just a few reasons why I have never used Macs.
by afterhours February 20, 2009 7:17 AM PST
Shadowing for the FW800 port is inconsistent with the other ports -- Fail. Anyone who has had to work on the soldered-on ports also knows the orientation for the FW port is rotated 90 degrees improperly. I love the Mini and own several of them, but this didn't come from an Apple lab.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (78 Comments)
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.