Comments on: Together in harmony: Mac and PC
Rafe Needleman loves his Mac but can't give up his PC. Here's how he stays productive using two different operating systems at the same time.
Rafe Needleman loves his Mac but can't give up his PC. Here's how he stays productive using two different operating systems at the same time.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
The Noisebridge hacker space offers sewing and Mandarin classes, soldering workshops, Internet-controlled front door access, and a server room with no door.
Photos: Circuits, code, community
roundup From Firefox to IE and from Chrome to Opera and Safari, there's no sitting still for browser makers looking to keep their products fresh and competitive.
I used to work in an environment where we mainly supported Windows and so often had Windows running in VMWare at work. The thing is, I use an external keyboard that is Logitech. You reprogram the Mac keyboard settings in system preferences and then use the Windows ones the way you are used to. It worked for me anyway.
These days it seems strange to run Windows of any flavor in a non-VM. If it weren't for your desire for a laptop and the high cost of a Mac Pro, I'd suggest just going Mac Pro. These days both Parallels and VMware have multiple core support. Just assign 4 cores to favorite VM software and have at it with the Mac Pro.
I'm in the exact same boat as you. I just bought a Mac Mini after 20 years as a PC power user who rarely uses the mouse. I use a PC for business (laptop) and a Mac at home (video creation, photos, etc.).
I live and die by keyboard shortcuts, which I need to relearn on the Mac. Don't get me wrong: I'm loving my Mac.
Here are the main problems I'm witnessing. If any Mac users have feedback on these, please pitch in:
1. Nightmare with font size issues in MS Office for Mac. I've explained it here in painstaking detail: http://www.officeformac.com/.59b6a7e4/0
2. Tab switching for applications that are minimized. Witch doesn't seem to let you ALT-TAB to an app that's minimized. It just works for apps that are open on your desktop.
Any thoughts?
Can't help you with tab switching. I switch using the mouse and the dock; but my workflow is mouse-heavy.
A computer geek wannabee. :)
I've been through lots of OSs from Atari 400 OS (whatever the name was) to Amiga's to DOS, Windows 3.x, 95, 98, NT, 2k, XP, OS2 (now eComStation), Linux (several distros with too many to remember), BeOS (Haiku is a clone of this). GeoOS (spelling?) Lots of different mice and keyboards, lots of office suites.
This isn't to show who can pee the farthest. It just shows that I've been around the block.
Out of all of them I like, LOVE OS/2 the most by far. Not even close. Amiga was great too even for business use. Mac OS X comes in third with Windows a distant 11th since it is aesthetically far behind everything else.
With every OS you have to learn new stuff. Especially new keyboard shortcuts and tricks. Instead of hating that, embrace it. You learn a lot more about Windows or any OS by getting deep into other ones.
I have two work Windows XP computers along with my personal G4 Mac Powerbook. I use the latter to compose most of my work and also remoting into Windows computers to fix them. It's pretty funny remoting from a Mac to fix a Windows computer.
Most of the time I remote into my work XP computers and don't physically touch their keyboards or look at their monitors. Mainly it's to pop in and look to see how to get to a certain feature in Office 2007. It's no big deal switching back and forth for me.
As for MS Office for Mac. I've seen it and I've had the chance to buy it for $20 but turned it down. I'm more than fine with Open Office 3 and iWork apps for my Mac.
Rafe: a quick note to let you know that Foxmarks is now available for Safari and Internet Explorer, as well as Firefox. Could help you get your MacBook and PC even more 'in sync' by syncing your bookmarks across platforms and browsers.
Like you, I have been using windows for slightly over 20 years, but I am a little younger than you. OK, I started my Windows habits early [laughter]. I've switched to a mac recently, and my encounters, considerations, annoyances are similar to yours. But not nearly, as research and engineering requires many unique and expensive simulations tool, available only to windows. I agree with most of the things you have mentioned.
Office for Mac: sucks [replace it with your own mac compatible adjective] big time.
Delete button: Where? I don't mean the cute but silly looking back space. I don't like to press another Fn key. That's one of the reasons why people pay more for a REAL SLR instead of some entry level slr with complicated button action?if any.
My Windows to Mac solution is simply Mac + VMWare. No messing around with the other ad hoc solutions. Dual boot with badly written drivers is a bad option.
Yes, I too suffering from the complication of switching between linux, mac, and windows operating environment. Every time I press a command+c to copy in Vista, I looked around to make sure that no one has witness my mac-habits [palm over eyes moment]. The same goes to Win-E, M, D, R, etc. on Mac. I happened to listen to your shortcut pod cast, thats a good one. Tom could loosen his definition of 'short-cuts' [smirk].
Having said that, there is one thing that I had disagree with you. How could you tolerate that cheap IBM M-type keyboard on your work desk? Yucks. Are the apple wired keyboard and Macbook keyboard treating your badly? Typing is more like operating an musical instrument than hammering a nail. I believe you are not old enough for the type writer era. Admittedly, it is an ugly sight to see 'professional' typing using 6 fingers, 3 on each hand. There are a lot of them out there that has stopped learning.
Also, despite having the same graphics card, the screen of the 13" macbook is very different when compared that to the 15" macbook pro. I blame it on the screen of my old IBM x60s for setting such low standard.
I don't know, I might switch to another fancy/cool looking OS if Steve is not around anymore.
Like you, I have been using windows for slightly over 20 years, but I am a little younger than you. OK, I started my Windows habits early [laughter]. I've switched to a mac recently, and my encounters, considerations, annoyances are similar to yours. But not nearly, as research and engineering requires many unique and expensive simulations tool, available only to windows. I agree with most of the things you have mentioned.
Office for Mac: sucks [replace it with your own mac compatible adjective] big time.
Delete button: Where? I don't mean the cute but silly looking back space. I don't like to press another Fn key. That's one of the reasons why people pay more for a REAL SLR instead of some entry level slr with complicated button action?if any.
My Windows to Mac solution is simply Mac + VMWare. No messing around with the other ad hoc solutions. Dual boot with badly written drivers is a bad option.
Yes, I too suffering from the complication of switching between linux, mac, and windows operating environment. Every time I press a command+c to copy in Vista, I looked around to make sure that no one has witness my mac-habits [palm over eyes moment]. The same goes to Win-E, M, D, R, etc. on Mac. I happened to listen to your shortcut pod cast, thats a good one. Tom could loosen his definition of 'short-cuts' [smirk].
Having said that, there is one thing that I had disagree with you. How could you tolerate that cheap IBM M-type keyboard on your work desk? Yucks. Are the apple wired keyboard and Macbook keyboard treating your badly? Typing is more like operating an musical instrument than hammering a nail. I believe you are not old enough for the type writer era. Admittedly, it is an ugly sight to see 'professional' typing using 6 fingers, 3 on each hand. There are a lot of them out there that has stopped learning.
Also, despite having the same graphics card, the screen of the 13" macbook is very different when compared that to the 15" macbook pro. I blame it on the screen of my old IBM x60s for setting such low standard.
I don't know, I might switch to another fancy/cool looking OS if Steve is not around anymore.
Everyone knows that Windows is for work, and Mac is--not even for fun--but style (life?).
To be honest, take a look at those Dell laptops. I find it hard to call it 'nice'.
The result is that I use Both. I use the PC to address billing and accounting functions, and to review digital Cadd files. I also have both MSWORD and COREL WORDPERFECT on the PC so that I can open either application that a client may send my way.
I tried the Fusion virtual machine route. The problem there is that it eats too much memory to run the MAC that way. First one must understand you are running 2 operating system software programs, and the fusion program just to get to the files on the virtual pc. SLOW.... So I use boot camp for the billing system.
I prefer Macs keynote, numbers pages and to the MAC Office Suite, but use and am comfortable with both depending on the application.
Presently, I am using Outlook Calendar, but am flirting with the potential of iCal in that there is a new software that purports to permit cross use between pc and Mac. I also understand that it will talk to my Storm. Yes, I am clearly working both sides of the isle.
Though initially a challenge, I am slowly getting what I want by way of compatibility and functionality. I have also learned that more software is available for the MAC so I can address CADD files.
Because I take my MACBook Pro with me where ever I go, I also employ "logmein" to connect to my desktop when out of the office. So yes it works, and is getting better by the day. I do not feel I am slowed by the process, in fact I can run multiple applications using both, without anticipation of a freeze or crash. Moreover when in the office I share files between the two and it works fine.
As one who has experienced the evolution of computers from Kaypro to the present, I can truly say that we have traded the simple efficiency of the device for a mass of complicated gizmo's that are infrequently used and frequently cause problems.
The best computer? A 486 with Wonder+ management. It would boot up in a few seconds ready to go to work. Wonder+ gave user friendly file management, etc.
The initial office program for text and spreadsheets worked just fine although small improvements could be applied. Sure, it could not multitask but I rarely found that to be a problem. Ideally, two 486's on my desk would cover 99.9% of my needs. If I did have to wait a few seconds during my work, I used that time to relax and collect my thoughts. Few of us had anxiety attacks and mental problems.
The complexity of today's computers and other devices are unwelcome to me.
I long for a simple straight six auto with all manual devices. I could change my own oil and do my own tuneups. With today's manufacturing quality it would last forever.
Remember, sometime more is less.
You should be able to set up a simple remap of your keyboard in your Windows startup (do they still have config.sys and autoexec.bat?) that takes care of the keyboard. Maybe a couple of labels on the keyboard will help. You may be overlooking a big advantage of the Mac - native multiple monitors for a single desktop. You can have Mac on one and Fusion/Parallels on the other, switch back and forth moving the mouse, cut and paste to your hearts content, and share every file.
To really blow your mind, since you appear to use WIndows primarily at work, have IT install a remote desktop client (I actually like MS RDC). I connect my creaking PowerBook with RDC to a Windows server and I'm faster than most Windows PCs on the network. It almost made using Windows a pleasure; certainly compared to using it native on a PC.
I know you could get fired from cnet just for thinking it, but it's time to give up the ghost. You know that with every release, both OS X and Windows, it keeps falling further behind. Unless MS can come up with a new, ground-up OS, Windows may be destined to be client-based for legacy apps. Honestly.
- by scarface74 February 14, 2009 7:54 PM PST
- I still don't understand why he needs a separate Windows based PC. What type of productivity enhancements is he gaining above when he just uses VMWare.
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 2 of 3 pages (92 Comments)On another note, why would Apple license OS X? Apple as is every other corporation is in business to maximize profit. Dell, Lenova, Acer, etc. sells more computers than Apple but is nowhere near is profitable.
Licensing OS X makes about as much sense as licensing the iPhone OS. There was just an article published this week that said for MS to be as profitable as Apple selling Mobile Phones that MS would have to sell 300 Million licenses just to equal the profit of 6.9 Million iPhones.