Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: Initial 'Wrath' impressions (or why I suck at leveling)

My name is Eric Franklin and I am a World of Warcraft slacker. You wouldn't know it however, judging by the weekend I had.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by tek-ed November 18, 2008 11:05 AM PST
People who run through a game and get through it as quickly as possible defeat the game's main purpose. These games are for immersion. You need to spend time exploring the environment, noticing the subtlties and interacting with NPCs. The developers spent a lot of time and effort to make the game as full and complete as possible...it is a disservice to those who created the game to just blaze through it and declare yourself king of the mountain because you finished first...you know what? In my opinion, those people *aren't* winners, they're loosers because they failed to become part of the game. They failed the game's main purpose...to create a realm you can get lost in. I think it is sad...I've watched people play games like Halo, or Return of the Jedi or Half Life 2 and they just run through the environments without even looking at anything...all they do is kill the baddies and run to the next scene...They don't wait to see the cut scenes, they don't interact with the NPCs...they're only goal is to get to the next level...I feel sorry for these disillusioned people...their travels IRL must be pathetic. Rushing through the experience of life just to get to the end...but we all know what happens at the end if life...it ends and you're dead. For real! So, like life, take a journey...try to stay away from the end for as long as possible...see everything, interact with everything...the goal is not the end, it's how you play the game!
Ed
web/gadget guru
Reply to this comment
by walsh84 November 18, 2008 12:07 PM PST
That may be what you look for, and expect out of the game, but the same can not blindly be said for all. Some people (myself included) are not as concerned with lore and avatar development as they are character/guild progression.

People power through the game for different reasons, you can't say they are wasting Blizzard's hard work. Why do you think they rush to 80? If you were Blizzard, would you not take it as a compliment that people are powering through to experience the new PvP, 10 man, and 25 man content? If you've even played any of the end-game content (which it sounds like you haven't) you'd realize that this is not the END for many, it's just the beginning. The process of obtaining new gear, enchants, defeating group encounters,etc. is far more exciting than mind-numbing quests whose formula has not changed since the original title.

Get off your self-titled "web/gadget guru" soap box.
by LiveStronger November 19, 2008 8:23 AM PST
@ Walsh - No, Blizzard wouldn't. WotLK has the greatest graphics, most beautiful areas and some of the most fun and random quests I've ever seen. Ed is right in saying that those people who bypass the hard work of the developers, who put just as much time in making an awe-inspiring environment as they did crunching the numbers for different classes and gear. The problem with blitzkrieging to 80 is it's very lonely, and trade chat has been plagued with around bored level 76+ toons doing lower-level instances because there's no one at their level. Yes, Level 80 does have more pvp, 5/10/25 mans, but at the same time, everyone they'll want to group or pvp with (i.e. the masses) won't be close to their level any time soon.
Reply to this comment
(3 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.