Comments on: 125 HDTVs tested for resolution performance

The HD Guru tests 125 high-def TVs for motion resolution and 1080i de-interlacing.

[Michichael]

Resolution doesn't mean a thing if the color, black, and viewing angles all reduce the overall quality of the image. You'll have a high res washout image.

[jafarm66]

On smaller TV's 37" and below I think its overvblown, My Sony accepts 1080P input (only outputs to 1080i) then downgrades its to 720P giving me a great picture. If on larger screens most videophiles can't tell the difference between 1080i and 1080p then who cares since a regular Joe probably won't either. If you want to spend the couple of hundred extra bucks fine, but until there's a discernable difference I will save the money and get some BluRay or DVD movies, The important measurements are color accuracy, contrast ratio (at least 2000:1), available adjustments, inputs, TV build quality.

[robd11]

It's all about black. Pionoeer plasma baby.

[MrChickenLeggs]

I completely agree with CNET's take.

While resolution is important on performance, when it comes to HDTVs, color accuracy, black level and viewing angle have by FAR greater impact on image quality. Outside those it is virtually impossible to tell the difference when it comes to HDTV image quality.

In my experience viewing angle and black level are the two BIG ones. It is amazing the difference it makes. If you are not buying a projection, then, viewing angle is not as glaring.

[Ordonator]

The resolution of an HDTV past 720p is irrelevant for most people. Of the people who are actually using the proper input for that resolution, less than half of them could probably really see the difference. It's just not worth it in measure of actual quality versus the exponential cost of the upgrade.

If you want to wow your friends, pay attention to black levels and contrast ratios. Nothing will impress more than bright, colorful pictures. Unfortunately, the only way to really see it is a side-by-side comparison since there's no standard between companies.

[Bulldog9]

2 words: Kuro Elite

[BenFlavoredCandy]

In a time where so many of the HDTV's picture quality are becoming basically the same, I'm going to focus on other aspects. Phillips EcoTV is a good start. Looking forward to what Sharp is releasing next month in the energy-saving category.

[amber0728]

I cry foul, for whatever reason BOTH CNET and HDGURU always favor Samsung. I will admit they do a nice job of blending economy price with feature rich products but I have never had any issues with my Philips HDTVs. They always look great in side-by-side comparisons and I'm always planning to buy an ECO 52" as soon as I sell or donate my 55" Philips projection HDTV. Last night the family watched another MNF in full HD - the friends and neighbors always remark on the image quality ... I've had that set for around 4 years now without any issues. Great for gaming too. I've seen the ECO in action and love the 'turn off pixel for best black and lower energy consumption' ... that's awesome!

[montrealguy]

Ok I just bought a SAMSUNG ln46580, I could not find any reviews on it anywhere and believe me I've checked! I was going for the 6 series at first because of the 120 HZ thing, but after looking at Sharp, Pioneer and all the others, a salesman showed me the 580 side by side with a Sharp( with 120 HZ) and a sam 650 all are 1080p. For the $700 or so difference I did not see much picture diff. so I bought it, Ihave had it a Whole week now and even after watching Hockey and NASCAR I am glad I did save the $700.00. I could see no reason for the 120HZ and with the money I saved I was able to buy a bluray player.
As far as Cnet favoring samsung, maybe there is a good reason I have 3 PC monitors, 1 Microwave, 2 MP3 players and a washer and Dryer. All Samsung (no I do not work for them)