Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: Photos: Zune 120 and Zune 16 (third generation)

CNET's Donald Bell shares photo galleries of the latest Zune 120 and Zune 16 MP3 players from Microsoft.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by tipoo_ September 16, 2008 12:20 PM PDT
IMHO, microsoft shouldnt have taken away the premium headphones and custom engraving.
Reply to this comment
by Lemon5 September 16, 2008 4:01 PM PDT
WHOA! MS dropped the premium headphones? On the 120gb version? LAME!
by tomorryzc December 24, 2008 7:08 PM PST
Well, premium head phones make zune cheerful.
When I put DVD video to zune with http://www.convert-video-dvd.com/dvd-to-zune-suite.html#115 I think microsoft zune is amazing...
by Rod Roddy September 16, 2008 1:22 PM PDT
The Zune and it's software are evolving into one kick-ass combo. I have a Zune 8gb and It rocks my socks off. I'm liking it even more with the new software updates. MS really got serious this time around.
Reply to this comment
by Uzbekistani September 16, 2008 4:46 PM PDT
Really? MS, what's wrong with you, guys? Zune's only comparative advantage over iPod (and I'm not an Apple fanboy) was superior earbuds. I myself was considering grabbing Zune next week or so. Really disappointing, call me a cheapo, but earbuds are a dealbreaker for me (not that I'm not going to be upgrading them anyway, but it's good to know that if my good pair dies, I always have somewhat better quality extra). Thank goodness we have Walkman. MS, you guys, should really hire a better marketing team.
Reply to this comment
by atomicbomb156 September 16, 2008 5:14 PM PDT
I already have a good pair of buds (Shure SE110) so having the premium headphones isn't that much of an issue to me. As long as the player has good sound quality. Pretty much anything that has better sound quality than the iPod. I currently have an 8GB Sony Walkman but I have a lot of media. Think upwards of 60GB. So I would much prefer to have a Zune simply because of its sound quality, nice, big screen, radio (yes I still listen to that), twist interface, and the customizability. I plan on getting a Zune Original which has some ridiculously awesome patterns. For $10 more it honestly isn't that bad. And some of the features on the Zune 3.0 software are pretty cool. It can be sluggish at times but then again so is iTunes. I am really starting to detest the whole white and blue thing going on. It hasn't changed in 4 years. Anything with a battery life over 24 hours is fine no need to run over 2 days like some mp3 players do. My walkman can go up to 36 hours. Simply put I much prefer the Zune. The screen, the price, and the space is what does it. Plus the whole twist interface and the zune pad is pretty cool to. The click wheel is old. And I'm not willing to spend $400 to get a 32GB iPod touch.
Reply to this comment
by dysonl September 16, 2008 7:41 PM PDT
I'd rather that the device comes with cheap earbuds and with bad sound quality, like the (cough) iPod (cough).
Reply to this comment
by milominderbender September 17, 2008 3:46 AM PDT
Honestly is it a slow work day at MS or do they farm out these fake postings to a call centre in Bengal?
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break September 17, 2008 8:00 AM PDT
Whatsa matter? The thought that ANYONE pickin' Redmond over Cupertino that galling to you?
by robvme September 17, 2008 7:49 AM PDT
The new software is awesome. I have the 80GB version of Zune second generation and just updated. Being able to find music wirelessly or on FM and download untethered from my computer is a huge jump. Combined with a Zune Pass (flat rate for all the music you can eat) this has suddenly become a seldom used device to one I carry almost everyday. Other features like Channel subscription, recommendations and picks, games, audiobooks, are all nice too.
Reply to this comment
by make_or_break September 17, 2008 8:07 AM PDT
I've barely loaded up my Zune 80 to 50% full, so no Zune 120 for me this time around. As for the bud downgrade...big deal. The "upgraded" buds with my 80 wasn't anything significant to cheer over, IMO. Yes, they're better than the crap AAPL bundles with their iPods, but it's not like it would take much to better an iPod's standard buds. A string tied to a tin can whip those things.

I'm going to have to update the software and firmware to see what all the fuss is about. And yeah, it had BETTER be a smoother transition from 2.x to 3.0 that the move from 1.4 to 2.0 was. Aside from the 360, I'm already not much of a MSFT fan; I don't need anymore clunky client software for my PMP to reinforce that at the same time.
Reply to this comment
by technobabble September 17, 2008 6:02 PM PDT
Although the premium headphone sounded nice, they did so only if you stood still. The outer covering of the cord was made of this fabric type material which looked chique but made a awfull noise when it rubbed against your shirt (think corduroy pants) this sound is then conducted straight to the buds. And very loudly so. I hardly ever use them.
Reply to this comment
(12 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.