Version: 2008

Crave

Comments on: New Sony LCD TV: thinner than ever

Today Sony introduced a new LCD-based HDTV that's just 9.9mm thick.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) (11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
by nazquel September 3, 2008 4:52 PM PDT
uh so i assume its 40inches?
Reply to this comment
by katzmaier September 4, 2008 7:47 AM PDT
Yup, just clarified in the text. Thx.
by Carl Glover September 3, 2008 6:35 PM PDT
I do indeed have an interest in thinner televisions. Thinness, up to a point, lends an air of elegance and sophistication to a flat panel. It's a matter of refinement of aesthetics. So, would I buy the thinner of two televisions, everything else being equal? The answer for me is "yes," as I suspect it would be for most people. I think Sony's on the right track here.
Reply to this comment
by hkjhd123 September 3, 2008 6:54 PM PDT
I am also interested in thin as possible TVs for one reason, wall mounting. I love a big TV mounted on a wall and the closer to the wall the better. I want my TV to look like a picture frame. This TV looks like it would do just that. Very cool.
Reply to this comment
by DocG September 4, 2008 4:13 AM PDT
I have no interest in thinner at this time since my TV sits in a fairly deep wall unit. However, due to the limited space (41 1/2") of the cabinet, I'm only able to have a 42 inch LCD. If manufacturers would focus more on the size of the LCD bezel (as some have with the DLP bezel), I'd be able to have a larger LCD. That'd interest me!
Reply to this comment
by Carlox1 September 4, 2008 9:24 AM PDT
i agree, i have a 40 inch xbr4 and i hate the bezel size, thats the reason i wouldnt be able to buy a large one because the big bezel, thin is also important to me, i hope all this helps to reduce prices too
Reply to this comment
by barkomatic September 4, 2008 5:31 PM PDT
If its thinner that probably means its also lighter. It might be possible to hang this TV as you would a picture, without the need for expensive mounts or brackets like conventional LCD TV's still require.
Reply to this comment
by barkomatic September 4, 2008 5:31 PM PDT
If its thinner that probably means its also lighter. It might be possible to hang this TV as you would a picture, without the need for expensive mounts or brackets like conventional LCD TV's still require.
Reply to this comment
by kikinken September 4, 2008 7:37 PM PDT
I saw those new OLED Tv's in person at the Sony open in Hawaii about a year ago. They had two of them working and showed various images like a humminbrid that was feeding

The Colors blew away all the other lcds/plasmas they had there and i knew that i was going to wait for this technology and stick with my CRT Tv's for the time being. they just released a new OLED screen thats thinner than a credit card and plan on selling a 27 inch version of this for about $40,000 i suspect since the 11 inch is $1100 ($1000 an inch).

In time(3-5 years?) , OLED(superior image, (1 million to 1 ratio!) will be my choice and i hope it will be the same for the rest of you.
Reply to this comment
by norcalrivercat September 4, 2008 8:12 PM PDT
Sweet....Expensive.
Reply to this comment
by jimmybeam13 September 4, 2008 9:10 PM PDT
uhm, i dont think everything else is going to be equal, e.g. the price tag.
Reply to this comment
(11 Comments)
  • prev
  • 1
  • next
advertisement

About Crave

The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com

Add this feed to your online news reader

Crave topics

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.