Comments on: FBI arrests blogger accused of leaking Guns N' Roses tracks
Los Angeles-area music blogger has allegedly admitted to streaming tracks of an unreleased Guns N' Roses album on his site.
Los Angeles-area music blogger has allegedly admitted to streaming tracks of an unreleased Guns N' Roses album on his site.
The name says it all. Crave is our blog about gorgeous gadgets and other crushworthy stuff. If you would like to contact Crave with a tip or comment, please write to: crave@cnet.com
Add this feed to your online news reader
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
He deserves what he gets, for obstructing the right of an artist ownership of their own work. They didn't even have the chance to release their material before he posted their material.
He deserves it. Yeah, people these days just want to take whatever they want to take, but there has to be limits.
It's a sad world we live in where streaming music is considered a horrendous crime and we waste lots of time, money and resources to convict a blogger where there are far more serious crimes going on that actually have an effect on society. Imagine if we channeled all the energy wasted on hunting down people who download music and actually use that go after drug dealers, rapists, gangs, etc... you know, REAL CRIME?
As if he actually had the right to do so. If Rose or GNR didn't feel any of the material was ready to be released, then it's their right to do as they please. Cogill's actions were self-serving and tromped over the band's own right to their own material.
This seems to be more going after the little guy as opposed to the actual source as various torrent sites seem to be either too elusive or too numerous to actually stop. The only point to sending 5 FBI agents to arrest a non-violent intellectual crimes offender as opposed to sending a summons is to send a message. Had there not been the FBI, this story wouldn't have made the news, and the copyright holders wouldn't be generating news stories that people, such as myself, whom have never visited said blog nor have listened to Guns N Roses would have known about this.
the fact that he was just streaming (and streaming is the keyword here...) the songs and was ordered to remove them (which he did) doesn't give the fbi the right to arrest him because of someones else's actions. i'm not condemning what he did, but come on. the fact that the riaa and the u.s. government can do this is appalling. every citizen of the u.s. should be peaved that the government has allowed a group of lawyers representing a washed up rock star to have this kind of control. the dmca and most of the copyright laws in place in the u.s. are garbage and should be treated as such.
- by realized September 1, 2008 1:03 AM PDT
- seems he admitted to it 2 times in writing (one signed), go here for updated information and the real court documents:
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
(18 Comments)http://www.piracyisacrime.org/In-The-Courtroom/updated-information-about-guns-n-roses-leak.html