Comments on: Will Apple sue Microsoft over Laptop Hunter ads?
A lawyer quoted in AdAge feels Apple has a good case against Microsoft over its Laptop Hunter campaign. The only question is whether Apple would actually gain anything from a lawsuit.
A lawyer quoted in AdAge feels Apple has a good case against Microsoft over its Laptop Hunter campaign. The only question is whether Apple would actually gain anything from a lawsuit.
Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.
Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.
Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.
Add this feed to your online news reader
If he had dropped a name it will add some credibility to his tale but he didn't.
He knew Apple will never comment of this issue just like Cramer who created some false rumor about Apple to short their shares and he knew Apple will neither confirm nor refute the rumor.
Turner sounded more like a fool rattling a gong because for all we know he is lying thru his teeth just to create this story and nobody the wiser because he knows Apple to keep mum as usual.
Like I stated elsewhere: A famous Mac/Apple user/promoter stated on a podcast that Apple had a recent security roll-up of over 600 MEGABYTES , mostly to fix holes in the UNIX core.
Yes Apple...you could be sued for LYING about Mac security. And lose big time.
Microsoft fans are jealous idiots.
Apple fans are self-aggrandizing idiots.
Some of you people need to get a life. It's just a COMPUTER, for chrissakes, not a religion. If you feel compelled to call someone else all sorts of denigrating names merely because of the brand of computer they choose to use... get professional therapy - as quickly as you can. PLEASE.
Here's a wiki on it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_evangelist
I agree this is just a preference, or in my case at work, a necessity. And really, I haven't chimed in on the Mac vs. PC discussion in about 5-6 years - I thought it had gone away!??! Yeah ...right...but there's some background info for ya - at least Bill never touted M$ as a religion!
I don't care for the kiddie bicker myself, "PC is better!", "No, Mac is!". But I'll tell you this: my mac WAS expensive when I got it, but that was money WELL SPENT. I got NINE years out of it, and it did it's job well during that entire time.
Bye, kids. That's my two cents.
"were often forced to buy a new one every 2 to 3 yrs, with no ways to work around it because either the OS or the hardware would magically malfunction and can't be fixed"
I don't think I have ever encountered an OS problem that magically forced me to have to buy a whole new computer. For that matter, I have never encountered a hardware malfunction that required the purchase of a whole new computer. I still have an AMD K6 400mhz machine running Linux. It has a PCI graphics card, 256mb of ram and with the exception of a power supply fan, nothing has been changed since I got it in 1998/99. It runs just the same as it did 10 years ago. I don't power it on that often, but it still works. I spent about $450 on that system as a barebones kit and the rest of the pieces.
I don't know if you are aware of this, but a computer is much like a car... surely you wouldn't run out and buy a new car every time you got a flat tire or ran out of a windshield wiper fluid? You are allowed to purchase components to replace components.... if your ram goes bad, you can buy new ram, if your dvd rom stops working, $25 will get you a brand new dvd burner to replace the bad one. Why your family would BUY a new computer every 2 or 3 years is just flat out silly!
EVERYONE knows that IBM-compatibles have always been cheaper, orginally!
And if you can't replace a video card in a Mac you have no business even being inside a computer. Never in 20 years of computing have I ever seen the inside of a computer so user friendly as a Mac Pro.
I have ONE Windows PC left in my business, and it will remain there solely for the purpose of opening MS Publisher files. It seems there are still a lot of wannabe designers out there who think having Publisher makes them a professional, and it's nothing more than Word with a few Quark features added.
Honesly... I think you're just blowing a lot of smelly smoke here, and have never owned a single Mac. OR, you did own them and had no idea how to use them, and decided to go cheap and easy instead.
It's ok. Not everyone is capable of understanding or executing "user friendly". Some people prefer to have issues due to their need to feel superior to the machine they are working on.
I mean, PC means personal computer right? So aren't Mac's essentially "personal computers"?
Iv`e heard many Mac users call it a "Bloated Monolithic Spreadsheet"
When those Microsoft stores come , Mac sales will drop even further. Bring them on !
- by Common-Sense87 September 6, 2009 2:59 AM PDT
- Why do macs cost so much??? Do pay for steve jobbs' experimental organ transplants.... Don't tell anyone I told you but he uses a microsoft os to run his bionic body ssshh
- Like this Reply to this comment
-
Showing 4 of 4 pages (194 Comments)