Version: 2008

Comments on: Susan Boyle falters, clutches stomach, and sings on

In her second performance on "Britain's Got Talent," YouTube sensation Susan Boyle begins with flat notes, but progresses to next week's final.

Add a Comment (Log in or register) Showing 1 of 2 pages (50 Comments)
by Megfowler May 24, 2009 11:25 PM PDT
This was the most pretentious, cliche-ridden account of anyone's musical performance since Celine Dion sang "My Heart Will Go On" at the Oscars. Falters? Clutches stomach? Sings on?

Good lord. She got a bit of stage fright and bellowed the rest. Let's not make it into a screenplay.

Wayyyy too many metaphors. Wayyyy too much drama. Communist Russia? Sheryl Crow lyrics? Tongue piercing speculation?

Someone get the author a Paxil and a cup of tea.
Reply to this comment
by cristianodiaz May 25, 2009 4:57 AM PDT
Excellent comment - I completely agree. The hyperbole on display is preposterous.
by nicmart May 25, 2009 5:06 AM PDT
They probably will make this into a screenplay, replete with soundtrack, and Ms. Boyle will sing it. Badly.
by mikestatic1 May 25, 2009 7:45 AM PDT
Yours was the most pathetic, self-indulgent drivel of a comment I've ever seen. And YOU are complaining?
by mopsalot May 25, 2009 11:51 AM PDT
Megflower dear - I'll have to go with mikestatic1. Your critique of Matyszczyk's award-winning article is unadulterated carp.
by jedmmj11 May 26, 2009 2:24 AM PDT
she acctually had a cold (look for a video on the b-g-t website saying something like 'talking to susan boyle')
by VisionAforethought May 25, 2009 12:45 AM PDT
What is this dumbed down celeb trash on CNET/News.com? A service I have relied upon and used for over 10 years since the start of the Internet revolution. Like many others, I specifically visit sites like this to escape our increaslingy dumbed down society. No kidding, if I see ONE more report like this, then not only will I refuse to visit (and therefore see/click ad banners) your site ever again (seeking more intellectually stimulating sources of news), but I will encourage others to boycott CNET until it stops. A tragic day for the technology community, a widespread tragedy for humanity. It is no wonder standards are falling world wide, in particular in the UK. Where's your honor CNET?
Reply to this comment
by datum226 May 25, 2009 7:43 AM PDT
dont worry. you will be replaced by an army of "myspace" crazy teenagers, who would love to read about the latest technological news about Britney.
by mikedgolf40505 May 26, 2009 6:37 AM PDT
This is tech news how? Please do not turn this into (i hate) PC(s) World.
by assman May 25, 2009 1:02 AM PDT
found it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SncyQKe6CnQ
Reply to this comment
by farker1 May 25, 2009 1:08 AM PDT
"Her life didn't depend on this one."

Come on; grow up. The whole beauty of her first performance was that she had nothing to lose. How could you possibly imply she sang back then as if her life depended on it?

I've said this before, but the Cnet blogs are really encouraging weak writing and thinking.
Reply to this comment
by IRCpresident May 25, 2009 3:20 AM PDT
Is there a way to report a certain article?
Reply to this comment
by Markus644 May 25, 2009 6:25 AM PDT
Absolutely. You will be refunded your subscription fee, and CNET Heavy Industries Inc. will be sure not to force you to read a similar article ever again. One you picked out of a feed yourself and could just as easily have ignored. Because God forbid someone will ever write something you get for free that you choose to read, that you might decide afterwards you didn't like.
by terminalblue May 25, 2009 6:53 AM PDT
all negative comments aside, i dont see the relevance as it applies to technology in this story.
Reply to this comment
by mls56 May 25, 2009 7:59 AM PDT
Well first, she started off sharp, not flat - go back and have a listen. And yeah, the review was hyperbolic and, I thought, inaccurate. Once she got her bearings she did extremely well. She's not a professional and does't have professional stage presence - big deal.

But basically I'm unclear on why CNET published a review of her performance, even in a blog, rather than something talking about techie stuff.
Reply to this comment
by cristianodiaz May 25, 2009 10:02 AM PDT
I think the very weak link that makes this relevant on a tech site is the fact that Susan Boyle became a phenomenon on YouTube.
by Cube Over May 25, 2009 9:51 AM PDT
There are a lot of babushkas who could sing as well. Why cling to only this one? Let's broaden the experiment! Bring them all on! And suddenly - it's not funny anymore.
All in all, she is Forrest Gump in a skirt... daring.
Reply to this comment
by politicojim May 31, 2009 6:35 AM PDT
I don't see her as a "Forrest Gump." Forrest had sympathy sex from Jenny, Ms. Susan Boyle is getting worldly emotion, people will come to her. Rags to riches maybe, Cinderella if not, but Forrest Gump? Maybe Dyersville.....Field of Dreams?
by vamman May 25, 2009 11:18 AM PDT
What a total waste of my time. What is this crap on CNET? This is the worst trash I ever read. So this woman got some stage freight? I don't know who she is or even really care but I know you (the author of this crap on CNET) are a ******* idiot.
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher May 25, 2009 11:36 AM PDT
Okay, this stage troll has had more than her 15 minutes of fame. It's time for her to return to beneath the bridge. If she truly was that great she would have sold millions of records years ago by producing something in a studio and releasing the music on CD.
Reply to this comment
by pentest May 26, 2009 8:25 AM PDT
Yeah, this is more idiotic than the article you are commenting under.

Selling records has nothing to do with talent. You really think the top 40 has more than one or two truly talented people in it at any given time?
by MadLyb May 26, 2009 8:59 AM PDT
Wow. I think my IQ actually went down by reading your comment.

You obviously have little or no clue about how the music industry works.

This lady has a very capable voice, and given the right exposure (which she is finally getting), she might sell some records or it could be strictly 15 mins of fame and back to her village.
by The_happy_switcher May 26, 2009 11:26 AM PDT
"Wow. I think my IQ actually went down by reading your comment. " Extremely doubtful.
by plusfourfour May 25, 2009 12:03 PM PDT
Hi,

As an ex-pro singer I was curious to see how Susan Boyle would perform with what must have been the greatest pressure any singer in our lifetime has ever had to face. Although she has performed in Karaokes and a few competitions on a first round principle this performance was something she could have no conception of how awesome and challenging it would be. I could not sit down when the two Geordie presenters announced her cue.

As I saw her take her few steps out onto the stage, the wall of fear that hit her senses was there to be seen. I gasped in horror. Please, O Lord, don't let this humble woman collapse, was the thought at the top of my emotional stack. Imagine that bedlam in her head, that pressure as she waded against a formidable tide of inconceivable fear to the microphone that must have seemed an unreachable distance ahead.

But she reached it. Perhaps just on acheiving this first simple, yet paradoxically difficult, task, she began to smile. I knew then that at least she had managed to hold on to her sanity, such is the fortitude of the human spirit. I realisied, for my part, that I was still holding my breath from my initial gasp.

The arpeggio of 'Memories' started up, and I had no idea what would come out of Susan Boyle's mouth. The very first note began not off-key but a whole octave lower than I had expected of her range. It sounded weak. I crouched down to the floor; as a singer I could see what had gone wrong. She simply did not have enough air in her lungs to blast out the correct pitch (even though the blast would have to be a controlled first-noter). Then incredibly she halved the length of her windpipe to push that first note up to the next octave. This caused a definite yodel effect. To be honest I've never in my life heard a singer do this midway through a note. Just after the note begins, yes, because that's the usual yodel method or the way a singer goes to a high-pitched falsetto (as Del Shannon used to do, such as in 'Runaway'). Anyway, now I realised Susan Boyle was in a place that would make Hell seem like a Freezer.

But somehow she managed to skillfully and patiently get herself out of the deepest, thickest and stickiest quagmire any singer could ever have found themselves drowning in. As she did so, I found myself breathing again. From this point onwards she looked secure psychologically, at least. Her voice grew stronger.

Then came a musical bridge leading to the finale. During this bridge Susan Boyle smiled (she had climbed to the top of the mountain of fear and now she knew she could give the finale a blast from Heaven with a lot less to lose. And she did. Not the best blast she is capable of, because of the physiological and psychological beating the weeks leading up to the performance, and the beginning of the performance itself, had taken out of her. But, still, one hell of a blast! It was a blast original to Susan Boyle, and quite breathtaking and awe-inspiring. I was overcome. Because she had overcome the greatest pressure ever placed on a performer in the history of popular music and had turned her performance into a potential winner.

Now all she had to do was deliver the final few notes. These, because they were higher than her natural range, were delivered with a head-voice (without the aid of the stable chest power). And she controlled and nailed them (although a listener would percieve them as being slightly false because they were in that they were technically falsetto notes); but like the Bee Gees they were delivered skillfully and powerfully enough to be classy.

It was done.

In my opinion, the greatest performance of all Time. Not because it was the greatest voice of all Time, or because the interpretation was the best of all Time; but because she delivered it under the greatest pressure and expectation of all Time. This is no exaggeration.

Good luck, Susan.

Tom
Reply to this comment
by The_happy_switcher May 25, 2009 12:13 PM PDT
Really, a great voice? Greater than someone like Enya, Loreena McKennitt, Joan Baez to name a few?--Hardly
by Leslie2277 May 25, 2009 5:32 PM PDT
Tom,

Thank you so much for the explanation of what exactly happened to Susan's first couple of notes last night. I, too, held my breath and was extremely relieved when she was able to recover.

I live near Niagara falls in Ontario Canada and started a Face Book site called "Canada Loves Susan Boyle". I hope you don't mind but I copied your post there for others to read so they too can understand.......

Leslie
by telscafe May 26, 2009 10:23 AM PDT
Hi Tom,

Your explanation is the best I've ever dawned upon. You see, I've never been into reality shows or hardly lingered into YouTube until Susan Boyle. Classical music and musicals have been lifelong passion but I was never formally trained as a musician but as an information technology professional. I had to register here so I can commend and ask your permission to print your comment in my blogsite, or perhaps two sites. Susan Boyle is not only gifted with a magnificent voice, she's a natural and has the guts of a true champion. She has just proven it how she pulled through in "Memory." What a performance! What a voice! What a lovely human being!

I pray that the media will be kind and respectful in treating this lovely lady who, in just few weeks, has given so much joy and warmth to millions of people around the world during these trying times.

Tom, my concern here is also on Susan Boyle's performance and her effect. I do hope you don't mind my posting your comment. You said it all so brilliantly. Thank you,

Tel
by biz888 May 28, 2009 2:16 PM PDT
Tom, you should REPLACE the commentor above Chris Matyszczyk. Your comment is far more intelligent and more enjoyable to read. You have a way better understanding of what Susan Boyle was going through.
by magelan54 May 30, 2009 4:58 AM PDT
Great story Tom,
sounds great except, pressure is what you make on yourself. she had no more pressure than the other people performing.
I'm just a little ( o.k. a lot) tired of excuses for her. anyone else that would have missed any note on a semi-final in front of those particular judges , would have met with verbal abuses, the least of which would be NO EXCUSES !
but that doesn't make for worldwide coverage. I wouldn't go so far as calling her a troll ( although i did find I very funny)
but the truth is that she would not be this far or talked about this much if she was great looking.
finally, I still believe that even today
In this world of prefabricated, marketed top 40 music, a true singing sensation would have come out ( before 40) no matter what. NO EXCUSES.

Lesly
by plusfourfour May 30, 2009 12:56 PM PDT
Anyone can use my comments. They're just the first thing that came in my head. My views on politics are probably silly, but I do feel the world can be a far less cruel place.

By the way, I just heard Susan Boyle's final-performance. She took the safe option and sang "I Dreamed a Dream". I think she sang it well enough to justify winning the competition (but it is obvious the stress and pressure she has been living under recently has taken its toll). I think if she wins, the pressure will ease.

Cheers,

Tom
by politicojim May 31, 2009 6:40 AM PDT
couldn't be more right on, thanks for the read.
by plusfourfour May 25, 2009 12:44 PM PDT
Susan Boyle is definately as good and standout as any of the list you give. Definately. Ask any pro. Ask some of the very people you have listed.

But my point is that the hype she had to deliver under was hitherto unexperienced by any singer in history. It really is that dramatic (and certainly not melodramatic).

Susan Boyle, if given a month in a top studio with a top engineer (say Mark Taylor who engineered Cher's 'Believe') then I think you'll appreciate her voice. She does not always act appropriately, and perhaps that is annoying to some people. Or perhaps some people are just bullies, like the ones she had to put up with until the day she realised her dreamed her dream.

Come on AppleRocks1963, give the lady a chance. She's only had one paid job in her entire life (trainee cook) which she failed at. But she's done charity work and looked for a job ever since. She looked after her dying mother. It's not a melodrama. It's her reality. Let her get through this now over-hyped competition, and see what she comes up with. I doubt you'll be disappointed. This lady did not deserve to suffer the pain our sicko world puts on people in less fortunate lives than those who often unfairly have been put in more fortunate ones. Don't tell me Demi Moore's tears aren't anything more than a sub-conscious stream of guilt. Let's be clear about one thing, people living in luxurious homes do not deserve to. The work they did or do can never substantiate their assets. Capitalism is just the best thing we have right now, because we're a greedy, evil race. But we're learning and hopefully progressing. Imagine if parents treated their children with Capitalist rewards. Johhny getting more candy because he's a better liar than Danille, or he happens to be cleverer, or whatever? Funny how we do to adults what we would never do to our offspring.

I think Susan Boyle is the tip of the iceberg in explaining what's wrong with our world. Susan Boyle is perhaps the offspring whom we want to have what she deserves. Not money or fame, but respect.

Tom (retired lead singer of plusfourfour)
Reply to this comment
by Mikejh99 May 25, 2009 1:36 PM PDT
This was one of the most pretentious piles of tripe I've ever had the misfortune of reading. Where does CNET find these people? I would hate to be one of the major corporations the authors brings his "irreverent, sarcastic, and sometimes ironic voice" to. For a supposed tech company, CNET doesn't seem to get that you can't just let untalented writers blog on your site and have 2.0 magic happen. (I'm not even going to try to figure out how this review is considered technology content)

As for Susan Boyle's performance... I think it was great that she faltered in the beginning before getting it back on track, and I think she deserved to be put through.
Reply to this comment
by mls56 May 25, 2009 1:56 PM PDT
By way of context, this blog *is* called "Technically Incorrect," so I suppose it's in keeping with things in general if Chris Matyszczyk writes things that are incorrect on a technical basis, whether it's that she was flat (nope) or that she struggled throughout (nope again) or that the discussion of the quality of her performance belongs in a technology industry news column (and we're three for three).
by plusfourfour May 25, 2009 3:22 PM PDT
For what it's worth...

I think this blog written by Chris Matyszczyk is excellent. I believe it is evidence of a natural talent for writing at the highest professional level. Surely, Susan Boyle has everything to do with technology, its power and its control; its effect on the global community.

I do admit though, that I commented on this blog on the understanding it was a blog for commenting on the performance and effect of Susan Boyle. I didn't know cnet was a organization concerned with technology. I'm an artist myself (or ex-artist), though, ironically, I do have to have a PhD in the field of internet technology. Don't worry, I'm not looking for a job with cnet! I'm just a fan of Susan Boyle because of what she stands for.

Not that he needs any of my encouragement, but, Mr Matyszczyk, please keep up the excellent work!
Reply to this comment
by servermaker May 26, 2009 9:44 AM PDT
ya, I don't think any of us were worried, but thanks for easing our collective mind. PhD in "internet technology"? didn't know cnet was a technology-focused media site?
by Mikejh99 May 26, 2009 3:52 PM PDT
Natural talent??? Highest professional level???

"the lights of a billion eyeballs"
"stoicism built from the bricks of a thousand days of damp, dark Scottish existence"
"twitchy bats"
"uncertain notes crept back in near the end like recurring doubts"
"the wrong flight and had been sent back in time to a party convention in Brezhnev's USSR."
"bathing in her story"

This is hack!
by johnisfun May 25, 2009 5:13 PM PDT
I clicked on the link in my news feed, wondering why CNET would be commenting on pop culture drivel. Then I see who wrote the article... my least favourite blogger.

Is there a way of filtering out headlines from my CNET news feed which come from this author? Matyszczyk has an arrogant, snide turn of phrase which may appeal to Vanity Fair readers, but not to most technies, surely?
Reply to this comment
by May 26, 2009 5:44 AM PDT
Please choose video's that include closed caption for the hearing impaired or subtitles.
Reply to this comment
by jtkaufmann May 26, 2009 7:00 AM PDT
Chris....I love your humanity. You wrote with such sincere empathy about this talented person. Thank you for starting out a Tuesday morning just right. Enjoy your day!
jt kaufmann
jtkaufmann@humanfactorinc.com
Reply to this comment
by fokkwp May 26, 2009 2:48 PM PDT
Driest, most boring rendition of this I've ever heard. Not unlike her original performance on the show.
Reply to this comment
by manumathewv May 27, 2009 8:49 AM PDT
Cnet- Will You please Stick on to Tech Reporting? I dont have to be here to read this.
Reply to this comment
by cp256 May 27, 2009 12:48 PM PDT
Wow, where do I start. I don't watch reality shows, I get enough reality from living I guess. While this performance wasn't as stunning as her first one, it was still very good. If you add up her story and her talent you get a good show. I think she's a courageous lady with a great voice and even though I am not into her kind of music, I was moved by her performances and I wish her much success. I expect that her next big performance to be quite a bit better than this one.

Mr. former-lead singer, thank you for your critique of Ms. Boyle, but you spoiled it with your socialist diatribe.

Only a blog troll could call Ms. Boyle a stage troll, what a worthless comment.

I come here for tech news, but Chris Matyszczyk's review of Ms. Boyle doesn't anger me for its lack of tech content. Anyone who saw the title and then read the review needs to find something better to do with their time rather than complain about the lack of tech relevance in a column that is provided to you free of charge.

It's a somewhat sad commentary on society that with so much good to say about Ms. Boyle and her emergence onto the big stage, so many people look at it as an opportunity to complain about something. She has enriched my life in a small way and for that I thank her. I'm looking forward to her next performance.
Reply to this comment
Showing 1 of 2 pages (50 Comments)
advertisement

15 sites that went kaput in 2009

Web sites launch all the time, but they also shut their doors. We highlight 15 that bit the dust this year.

Top 10 news stories of the decade

Let the debate begin: Was the iPhone more important than iTunes? Was anything bigger than Google finding a great business model? CNET offers its list of the 10 most important stories of the '00s.

About Technically Incorrect

Chris Matyszczyk brings a fresh and irreverent perspective to the tech world in his CNET blog, Technically Incorrect. He is a member of the CNET Blog Network and is not an employee of CNET.

Add this feed to your online news reader

Technically Incorrect topics

advertisement
advertisement